Skip to content

Conversation

@steffenlarsen
Copy link
Contributor

Some host-compilers may create lambdas with captures that do not match the ones used when extracting kernel descriptors. The compiler does not currently have a stable way of handling these cases, so instead this PR adds a static assertion that the sizes match with a message informing about the limitation.

Some host-compilers may create lambdas with captures that do not match
the ones used when extracting kernel descriptors. The compiler does not
currently have a stable way of handling these cases, so instead this PR
adds a static assertion that the sizes match with a message informing
about the limitation.

Signed-off-by: Larsen, Steffen <steffen.larsen@intel.com>
@steffenlarsen steffenlarsen marked this pull request as ready for review June 29, 2022 14:20
@steffenlarsen steffenlarsen requested a review from a team as a code owner June 29, 2022 14:20
@steffenlarsen steffenlarsen requested a review from v-klochkov June 29, 2022 14:20
Signed-off-by: Larsen, Steffen <steffen.larsen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Larsen, Steffen <steffen.larsen@intel.com>
using type = FalseT;
};

using int64_t = conditional<sizeof(long) == 8, long, long long>::type;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ideally we should check that sizeof(long long) is 8, if sizeof(long) != 8.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree, but this mimics the decision made by SemaSYCL when generating the specialization, so it should be fine for our testing.

@steffenlarsen
Copy link
Contributor Author

@v-klochkov - Friendly ping.

#include <CL/sycl/detail/defines_elementary.hpp>
#include <CL/sycl/detail/export.hpp>

#include <cstdint>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, perhaps this will also fix one of internal trackers reporting problems with undefined int8_t type slipped into integration-header file.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This inclusion is giving oneapi/dpl a stomach ache.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@v-klochkov v-klochkov merged commit d278c67 into intel:sycl Jul 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants