-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Answered by
napetrov
Mar 14, 2023
Replies: 1 comment
-
@gaosiy With current design there is no support general support for non-sklearnex inference. This is area that we would consider looking on, but not in nearest future. Also it's important to note that skelearnex not necessary creates scikit-learn compatible models and this is part of optimizations that are used. So simple linear models 1:1 mapping is possible, while for more complex models such as SVM, Random Forest models would be different. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Answer selected by
napetrov
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
@gaosiy With current design there is no support general support for non-sklearnex inference. This is area that we would consider looking on, but not in nearest future.
Also it's important to note that skelearnex not necessary creates scikit-learn compatible models and this is part of optimizations that are used. So simple linear models 1:1 mapping is possible, while for more complex models such as SVM, Random Forest models would be different.