Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: rename store locator model #1033

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 1, 2022

Conversation

dhhyi
Copy link
Collaborator

@dhhyi dhhyi commented Feb 28, 2022

PR Type

[x] Refactoring (no functional changes, no API changes)

What Is the Current Behavior?

The store locator feature (#911) introduced a model Store that clashes with the naming of the @ngrx/store. Also a linting ignore has been introduced to disable the no-intelligence-in-artifacts rule so that the model can be used in the extension, but that also now enables the usage of NgRx directly in components in the store-locator feature.

What Is the New Behavior?

Renamed Store to StoreLocation and removed lint ignore.

Does this PR Introduce a Breaking Change?

[ ] Yes
[x] No

Other Information

AB#74657

@dhhyi dhhyi added refactoring Refactoring of current code community Community contributions labels Feb 28, 2022
@dhhyi dhhyi requested a review from MaxKless February 28, 2022 20:45
@shauke shauke added this to the 2.1 milestone Mar 1, 2022
@shauke shauke self-assigned this Mar 1, 2022
@shauke shauke self-requested a review March 1, 2022 07:48
@shauke shauke assigned MaxKless and unassigned shauke Mar 1, 2022
@shauke shauke removed their request for review March 1, 2022 07:49
@MaxKless MaxKless merged commit 16bfbb0 into develop Mar 1, 2022
@MaxKless MaxKless deleted the refactor/rename-store-locator-model branch March 1, 2022 11:38
SGrueber pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
community Community contributions refactoring Refactoring of current code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants