-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 795
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(runtime): support watch for components with custom tag names #5767
Conversation
|
Path | Error Count |
---|---|
src/dev-server/index.ts | 37 |
src/dev-server/server-process.ts | 32 |
src/compiler/prerender/prerender-main.ts | 22 |
src/runtime/client-hydrate.ts | 20 |
src/runtime/vdom/vdom-render.ts | 20 |
src/screenshot/connector-base.ts | 19 |
src/testing/puppeteer/puppeteer-element.ts | 19 |
src/dev-server/request-handler.ts | 15 |
src/compiler/prerender/prerender-optimize.ts | 14 |
src/compiler/sys/stencil-sys.ts | 14 |
src/runtime/connected-callback.ts | 14 |
src/sys/node/node-sys.ts | 14 |
src/compiler/prerender/prerender-queue.ts | 13 |
src/compiler/sys/in-memory-fs.ts | 13 |
src/runtime/set-value.ts | 13 |
src/compiler/output-targets/output-www.ts | 12 |
src/compiler/transformers/test/parse-vdom.spec.ts | 12 |
src/compiler/transformers/transform-utils.ts | 12 |
src/mock-doc/test/attribute.spec.ts | 12 |
src/compiler/build/compiler-ctx.ts | 11 |
Our most common errors
Typescript Error Code | Count |
---|---|
TS2322 | 358 |
TS2345 | 344 |
TS18048 | 201 |
TS18047 | 77 |
TS2722 | 37 |
TS2532 | 24 |
TS2531 | 19 |
TS2454 | 14 |
TS2790 | 11 |
TS2352 | 9 |
TS2769 | 8 |
TS2416 | 7 |
TS2538 | 4 |
TS2493 | 3 |
TS18046 | 2 |
TS2684 | 1 |
TS2430 | 1 |
Unused exports report
There are 15 unused exports on this PR. That's the same number of errors on main, so at least we're not creating new ones!
Unused exports
File | Line | Identifier |
---|---|---|
src/runtime/bootstrap-lazy.ts | 21 | setNonce |
src/screenshot/screenshot-fs.ts | 18 | readScreenshotData |
src/testing/testing-utils.ts | 198 | withSilentWarn |
src/utils/index.ts | 145 | CUSTOM |
src/utils/index.ts | 245 | NODE_TYPES |
src/utils/index.ts | 269 | normalize |
src/utils/index.ts | 7 | escapeRegExpSpecialCharacters |
src/compiler/app-core/app-data.ts | 25 | BUILD |
src/compiler/app-core/app-data.ts | 116 | Env |
src/compiler/app-core/app-data.ts | 118 | NAMESPACE |
src/compiler/fs-watch/fs-watch-rebuild.ts | 123 | updateCacheFromRebuild |
src/compiler/types/validate-primary-package-output-target.ts | 61 | satisfies |
src/compiler/types/validate-primary-package-output-target.ts | 61 | Record |
src/testing/puppeteer/puppeteer-declarations.ts | 485 | WaitForEventOptions |
src/compiler/sys/fetch/write-fetch-success.ts | 7 | writeFetchSuccessSync |
PR built and packed!Download the tarball here: https://github.com/ionic-team/stencil/actions/runs/9103525433/artifacts/1507151128 If your browser saves files to
|
0741024
to
8e38478
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
change makes sense to me! Just noticed I think one little typo in the comment and had one clarification
@@ -13,7 +13,8 @@ const testRequiresManualSetup = | |||
window.__wdioSpec__.includes('custom-elements-output-tag-class-different') || | |||
window.__wdioSpec__.includes('custom-elements-delegates-focus') || | |||
window.__wdioSpec__.includes('custom-elements-output') || | |||
window.__wdioSpec__.includes('global-script'); | |||
window.__wdioSpec__.includes('global-script') || | |||
window.__wdioSpec__.endsWith('custom-tag-name.test.tsx'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we need this because we don't want the normal .define
call to happen, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, so we avoid registering all the components to the registry to test the behavior where user would do this manually.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Co-authored-by: Alice Pote <alice.writes.wrongs@gmail.com>
What is the current behavior?
If users define their component with a custom tag name, the
@Watch
decorator doesn't work.GitHub Issue Number: #3554
STENCIL-546
What is the new behavior?
Instead of using the component meta data we just pick the tag name for the component directly.
Documentation
n/a
Does this introduce a breaking change?
Testing
Added an unit test for this.
Other information
n/a