Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 16, 2021. It is now read-only.

docs: add blog post for js-ipfs 48 #454

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 20, 2020
Merged

docs: add blog post for js-ipfs 48 #454

merged 6 commits into from
Jul 20, 2020

Conversation

achingbrain
Copy link
Contributor

Adds post for the js-IPFS release today

Copy link
Contributor

@vasco-santos vasco-santos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me! Just a small detail regarding the delegated router that should be used.

and nice work with the API improvements!

There are several ways to give in-browser IPFS nodes a better experience on the network, one of those is [Delegate Nodes](https://blog.ipfs.io/2019-08-06-js-ipfs-0-37/#delegated-peer-and-content-routing). A Delegate Node is a network peer that performs certain actions on behalf of other nodes on the network. In this case it will make [DHT][] queries on our behalf so we can find more peers and more content than ever before.

`js-IPFS@0.48.0` enables delegate nodes in the configuration by default. That means you should see far more peers that you have previously and be able to find content faster and more reliably than ever before.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should mention that the default config uses public delegate nodes, but in a production environment other delegate nodes should be setup to guarantee availability and avoid congestion. I have in my TODO list to create some documentation around libp2p infrastructure/deployment guidelines libp2p/js-libp2p#696 that will be useful for this. But meanwhile, I think we can just say that people should configure their own as we already have some information on how to do that, but it is spread across multiple channels

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done!

Copy link
Contributor

@vasco-santos vasco-santos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Collaborator

@jacobheun jacobheun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added some language corrections and a recommendation to clarify js dht performance expectations.

@achingbrain achingbrain merged commit 1980202 into master Jul 20, 2020
@achingbrain achingbrain deleted the post/js-ipfs-0-48-0 branch July 20, 2020 09:00
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants