forked from ipfs/boxo
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RAPIDE & IPSL: first proof of concept #1
Draft
Jorropo
wants to merge
41
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
rapide
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
5 tasks
This still requires lots of work. This include a mostly complete compiler, (minus a few types and literals). More nodes and scopes will be required.
Will be fine performance wise once #57 is fixed.
This include a working single threaded structure for RAPIDE. Todo: - Multithreading - dontGoThere map for serverDrivenWorker - Racing
This help avoiding situations where you go race someone else, in a shallow dag, and you get a block next to them in the traversal.
We do not have consensus nor usecase for the language part of IPSL, to avoid long debates for some not yet usefull pieces of code, I've removed it and we will handle merging this part seperately (or never merge it).
In 719b5e6 I changed `download.expand` to release the node lock before returning. This allows other workers to access the just expanded node while we walk up the chain ancestry. This mean that when we relock the node later to add it to our list of tasks, someone else may have downloaded some of the blocks already and thus they are not in the childrens slice and thus we wont add them to our list. This also solve the case where you give a Traversal that is not supported by the underlying protocol, in that case we want to kill the current download and retry deeper, while previously we would hard error on this and kill the worker.
This happen when duplicated blocks are part of the dag.
Jorropo
force-pushed
the
rapide
branch
2 times, most recently
from
March 23, 2023 10:47
b38c1c4
to
e93fb4b
Compare
This fallsback to fastrand in go1.21 and is well fast enough.
It lacks many features mainly backtracking and rescan.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #2 #3 #4
Moves of ipfs#148