Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add benchmarks for data transfer #88

Closed
achingbrain opened this issue Apr 11, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #90
Closed

Add benchmarks for data transfer #88

achingbrain opened this issue Apr 11, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #90
Assignees

Comments

@achingbrain
Copy link
Member

A benchmark suite should be added to test transfer speeds:

  • Helia -> Helia
  • Kubo -> Helia
  • Helia -> Kubo
  • Kubo -> Kubo

These should test variations in block sizes, DAG layer size, overall file size etc.

They should follow the same format and use the same testing libraries a the existing gc benchmarks.

@achingbrain achingbrain self-assigned this Apr 11, 2023
achingbrain added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 13, 2023
Adds a benchmark suite for doing various size data transfers between
helia, kubo and js-ipfs.

Closes #88
@SgtPooki SgtPooki moved this to 🏃‍♀️ In Progress in Helia Working Group (inactive) Jan 8, 2024
@SgtPooki SgtPooki moved this to 🏃‍♀️ In Progress in IPFS Shipyard Team Jan 8, 2024
achingbrain added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 19, 2024
Adds a benchmark suite for doing various size data transfers between
helia, kubo and js-ipfs.

Closes #88
achingbrain added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 22, 2024
Adds a benchmark suite for doing various size data transfers between helia and kubo.

Closes #88
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 🏃‍♀️ In Progress to 🎉 Done in IPFS Shipyard Team Apr 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
No open projects
Status: 🏃‍♀️ In Progress
Status: 🎉 Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant