Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: update ipfs-http-client #1840

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

hacdias
Copy link
Member

@hacdias hacdias commented Aug 19, 2021

Depends on:

To fix:

License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Henrique Dias hacdias@gmail.com

License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Henrique Dias <hacdias@gmail.com>
@hacdias hacdias temporarily deployed to Deploy August 19, 2021 09:28 Inactive
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Henrique Dias <hacdias@gmail.com>
@hacdias hacdias temporarily deployed to Deploy August 19, 2021 09:39 Inactive
@hacdias hacdias temporarily deployed to Deploy August 19, 2021 09:55 Inactive
@hacdias
Copy link
Member Author

hacdias commented Sep 7, 2021

See #1798 (comment)

@SgtPooki
Copy link
Member

SgtPooki commented Jul 9, 2022

@SgtPooki
Copy link
Member

SgtPooki commented Aug 29, 2022

We should delay this until https://github.com/ipfs/js-kubo-rpc-client/milestone/1 is done so we don't increase our workload, and then replace ipfs-http-client with kubo-rpc-client

@BigLep
Copy link

BigLep commented Jan 12, 2023

@SgtPooki : given the js-kubo-rpc-client has been released, are we unblocked to do the work of of removing ipfs-http-client and using it instead?

@SgtPooki
Copy link
Member

@SgtPooki : given the js-kubo-rpc-client has been released, are we unblocked to do the work of of removing ipfs-http-client and using it instead?

Yessir we are. Please see #2079

@SgtPooki
Copy link
Member

Closing this in favor of #2079

@SgtPooki SgtPooki closed this Jan 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status/blocked Unable to be worked further until needs are met
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants