Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: different countly keys for kubo and webui.ipfs.io deployments #2081
feat: different countly keys for kubo and webui.ipfs.io deployments #2081
Changes from 7 commits
85c8f3a
c2fbccc
f9d9c52
8465c9d
d15e1b7
d9d18b8
b734ab5
e1f0296
364dcba
827c13a
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👎 this actually fails some existing tests and was how I had the code originally
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
NIT:
is this kubo check necessary? if not local or webui.ipfs.io it would be kubo correct?
is this check just a safeguard for future?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unfortunately, it is required as we can't really guarantee that it's kubo unless it meets the expectations of kubo. We should assume it's typical webui unless we can guarantee it's kubo. I added some tests to express this more clearly, but as lidel mentioned at #2078 (comment) it's susceptible to silent failures upon kubo's changing of behavior.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
that question was something i was wondering myself after addressing lidel’s latest comment. but i’d rather have some webui metrics for kubo under webui (when/if they change behavior) than non-kubo webui metrics listed for kubo
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
makes sense, tests help too. LGTM