This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 12, 2024. It is now read-only.
fix: replace slice with subarray for increased performance #4210
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In several places we call
.slice
as a way to transformBufferList
s toUint8Array
s. Due to refactors in some places we are now calling.slice
onUint8Array
s which is a memory-copy operation.In other places
Uint8ArrayList
s are now returned instead ofBufferList
s on which.slice
is also a memory-copy operation.Swap
.slice
for.subarray
which is no-copy forUint8Array
s and can be no-copy forUint8ArrayList
s too, where there is only a single backing buffer.In places where we need to transform multiple
Uint8ArrayList
s to multipleUint8Array
s, yield the iterators of theUint8ArrayList
s as this is also a no-copy operation.