test: 'get recursive' test #741
Conversation
test/cli/test-files.js
Outdated
| return ipfs('files get QmUhUuiTKkkK8J6JZ9zmj8iNHPuNfGYcszgRumzhHBxEEU').then((out) => { | ||
| const directory = path.join(process.cwd(), 'QmUhUuiTKkkK8J6JZ9zmj8iNHPuNfGYcszgRumzhHBxEEU') | ||
| expect(fs.readdirSync(directory).length).to.be.eql(8) | ||
| // TODO add assertion on content of files |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@victorbjelkholm your turn, tests are passing :)
(also, make sure to unlink to delete that file, like the other tests do.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@pgte @diasdavid hm, it's not passing for me, getting:
1) cli --all files with daemon off (requiring js-ipfs core directly) get recursively:
AssertionError: expected 1 to deeply equal 8
+ expected - actual
-1
+8
at ipfs.then (test/cli/test-files.js:96:56)
at process._tickDomainCallback (internal/process/next_tick.js:129:7)
2) cli --all files with daemon on (contacting js-ipfs through http-api) get recursively:
AssertionError: expected 1 to deeply equal 8
+ expected - actual
-1
+8
at ipfs.then (test/cli/test-files.js:96:56)
at process._tickDomainCallback (internal/process/next_tick.js:129:7)
Seems it's only pulling down one file rather than 8...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could you try again (fresh npm install)
…ut the differences if there are any
| it('add recursively test 1', () => { | ||
| return ipfs('files add -r src/init-files/init-docs').then((out) => { | ||
| it('add recursively test', () => { | ||
| return ipfs('files add -r test/test-data/recursive-get-dir').then((out) => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for creating a folder that will stay immutable, this will save time in the future :)
test/cli/test-files.js
Outdated
| const outDir = path.join(process.cwd(), 'QmYmW4HiZhotsoSqnv2o1oUusvkRM8b9RweBoH7ao5nki2') | ||
| rimraf(outDir) | ||
| return ipfs('files get QmYmW4HiZhotsoSqnv2o1oUusvkRM8b9RweBoH7ao5nki2').then((out) => { | ||
| console.log(out) |
|
I've been seeing the |
|
@diasdavid I haven't been able to make it fail locally.. |
|
I just tried again to see my luck and I got it to fail with the error: |
|
@diasdavid correction: I was able to reproduce this. Investigating. |
Adding since Github acted weird and closed #736