-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
object-patch: Support linking to non-dagpb objects #4460
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -216,6 +216,13 @@ test_object_cmd() { | |
ipfs object stat /ipfs/$N3/foo/baz > /dev/null | ||
' | ||
|
||
test_expect_success "'ipfs object patch add-link' allow linking IPLD objects" ' | ||
EMPTY_DIR=$(ipfs object new unixfs-dir) && | ||
OBJ=$(echo "123" | ipfs dag put) && | ||
N1=$(ipfs object patch $EMPTY_DIR add-link foo $OBJ) && | ||
ipfs object stat $N1 > /dev/null | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This should also test resolving the link, i.e. |
||
' | ||
|
||
test_expect_success "object patch creation looks right" ' | ||
echo "QmPc73aWK9dgFBXe86P4PvQizHo9e5Qt7n7DAMXWuigFuG" > hash_exp && | ||
echo $N3 > hash_actual && | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is a bit risky to do this way. Lets switch on the type, and then explicitly handle the ProtoNode and RawNodes. Then for everything else we can error out.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why not allow linking to other types? I actually need this to link to git commits, it works well for my usecase (ipld git helper). (note that it's already possible to do this with dag commands)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The issue isnt that we don't want to allow linking, but that this operation is supposed to recursively copy a graph from one dagservice to another.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@magik6k we can change the first argument of this function to accept a
node.Node
, then skip this check entirelyThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done