Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(ci): automate docker releases on tag pushes #138

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 23, 2024

Conversation

galargh
Copy link
Contributor

@galargh galargh commented May 21, 2024

Using a custom GItHub token in releaser was introduced in https://github.com/ipdxco/unified-github-workflows/releases/tag/v1.0.2

I set up a custom fine-grained PAT with contents write access only to this repository. The token is owned by web3-bot and valid for 1 year.

By using custom PAT we should be able to react to tag push events in the docker publish workflow again.

Testing -> we're going to oversee the next release to make 100% sure the automation works as expected.

❓ Are there any other repos where you'd like us to introduce a change like this one?

@galargh galargh requested review from lidel and hacdias May 21, 2024 08:45
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member

@lidel lidel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, let's land this and see if tag for next release gets docker image

@lidel lidel changed the title Automate docker releases on tag pushes refactor(ci): automate docker releases on tag pushes May 22, 2024
@lidel lidel mentioned this pull request May 22, 2024
@hacdias hacdias merged commit ed0bbe5 into main May 23, 2024
10 checks passed
@hacdias hacdias deleted the ipdx/docker-release-automation branch May 23, 2024 07:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants