-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[TKW] Fix indexing of Reduction and GetResult to enable post-tile op. #162
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
raikonenfnu
force-pushed
the
indexBackwardFix
branch
from
September 24, 2024 17:18
5cb6a77
to
6cefe3a
Compare
This PR introduces changes to handle elementwise or general arithmetic operations after we did some tiled-loop-reduction ("Reduction") operation. The main problem with the current stack is indexing_dims information for Reduction relies on the user. This would work if it's user/consumer is tkw.write, but in other cases such as BinaryPyOp or UnaryPyOp, it will lack such information. To make matters worst BinaryPyOp/UnaryPyOp depends on it's src/producer for indexing dim, while Reduction op depends on it's dst/consumer for its' indexing dim information. This would ended up causing infinite loop between UnaryPyOp/BinaryPyOp <-> Reduction. This PR fixes the indexing dimension logic Reduction and GetResult (required for expanded Reduction) to be based on it's reduction axis(for Reduction) and it's source/consumer information. Signed-off-by: Stanley Winata <stanley.winata@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanley Winata <stanley.winata@amd.com>
harsh-nod
approved these changes
Sep 24, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nice! thanks, this looks very clean!
IanNod
pushed a commit
to IanNod/iree-turbine
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 30, 2024
…iree-org#162) This PR introduces changes to handle elementwise or general arithmetic operations after we did some tiled-loop-reduction ("Reduction") operation. The main problem with the current stack is indexing_dims information for Reduction relies on the user. This would work if it's user/consumer is tkw.write, but in other cases such as BinaryPyOp or UnaryPyOp, it will lack such information. To make matters worst BinaryPyOp/UnaryPyOp depends on it's src/producer for indexing dim, while Reduction op depends on it's dst/consumer for its' indexing dim information. This would ended up causing infinite loop between UnaryPyOp/BinaryPyOp <-> Reduction. This PR fixes the indexing dimension logic Reduction and GetResult (required for expanded Reduction) to be based on it's reduction axis(for Reduction) and it's source/consumer information. --------- Signed-off-by: Stanley Winata <stanley.winata@amd.com>
IanNod
pushed a commit
to IanNod/iree-turbine
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 30, 2024
…iree-org#162) This PR introduces changes to handle elementwise or general arithmetic operations after we did some tiled-loop-reduction ("Reduction") operation. The main problem with the current stack is indexing_dims information for Reduction relies on the user. This would work if it's user/consumer is tkw.write, but in other cases such as BinaryPyOp or UnaryPyOp, it will lack such information. To make matters worst BinaryPyOp/UnaryPyOp depends on it's src/producer for indexing dim, while Reduction op depends on it's dst/consumer for its' indexing dim information. This would ended up causing infinite loop between UnaryPyOp/BinaryPyOp <-> Reduction. This PR fixes the indexing dimension logic Reduction and GetResult (required for expanded Reduction) to be based on it's reduction axis(for Reduction) and it's source/consumer information. --------- Signed-off-by: Stanley Winata <stanley.winata@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Ian <ian.nordeng@amd.com>
IanNod
pushed a commit
to IanNod/iree-turbine
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 30, 2024
…iree-org#162) This PR introduces changes to handle elementwise or general arithmetic operations after we did some tiled-loop-reduction ("Reduction") operation. The main problem with the current stack is indexing_dims information for Reduction relies on the user. This would work if it's user/consumer is tkw.write, but in other cases such as BinaryPyOp or UnaryPyOp, it will lack such information. To make matters worst BinaryPyOp/UnaryPyOp depends on it's src/producer for indexing dim, while Reduction op depends on it's dst/consumer for its' indexing dim information. This would ended up causing infinite loop between UnaryPyOp/BinaryPyOp <-> Reduction. This PR fixes the indexing dimension logic Reduction and GetResult (required for expanded Reduction) to be based on it's reduction axis(for Reduction) and it's source/consumer information. --------- Signed-off-by: Stanley Winata <stanley.winata@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Ian <ian.nordeng@amd.com>
stellaraccident
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 13, 2024
…#162) This PR introduces changes to handle elementwise or general arithmetic operations after we did some tiled-loop-reduction ("Reduction") operation. The main problem with the current stack is indexing_dims information for Reduction relies on the user. This would work if it's user/consumer is tkw.write, but in other cases such as BinaryPyOp or UnaryPyOp, it will lack such information. To make matters worst BinaryPyOp/UnaryPyOp depends on it's src/producer for indexing dim, while Reduction op depends on it's dst/consumer for its' indexing dim information. This would ended up causing infinite loop between UnaryPyOp/BinaryPyOp <-> Reduction. This PR fixes the indexing dimension logic Reduction and GetResult (required for expanded Reduction) to be based on it's reduction axis(for Reduction) and it's source/consumer information. --------- Signed-off-by: Stanley Winata <stanley.winata@amd.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR introduces changes to handle elementwise or general arithmetic operations after we did some tiled-loop-reduction ("Reduction") operation.
The main problem with the current stack is indexing_dims information for Reduction relies on the user. This would work if it's user/consumer is tkw.write, but in other cases such as BinaryPyOp or UnaryPyOp, it will lack such information.
To make matters worst BinaryPyOp/UnaryPyOp depends on it's src/producer for indexing dim, while Reduction op depends on it's dst/consumer for its' indexing dim information. This would ended up causing infinite loop between UnaryPyOp/BinaryPyOp <-> Reduction.
This PR fixes the indexing dimension logic Reduction and GetResult (required for expanded Reduction) to be based on it's reduction axis(for Reduction) and it's source/consumer information.