Update E2E #467
Update E2E #467
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant modifications across various files primarily focused on updating import statements, transitioning from Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Warning Rate limit exceeded@wangjiulian has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 24 minutes and 16 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 15
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
modules/random/abci.go (1)
60-60: Consider adding additional entropy sourcesWhile the current implementation combines
appHash, timestamp, and consumer address, consider adding more entropy sources to strengthen the randomness, especially given the switch to the more deterministicAppHash.Consider this enhancement:
-random := types.MakePRNG(appHash, currentTimestamp, consumer, nil, false).GetRand() +random := types.MakePRNG( + appHash, + currentTimestamp, + consumer, + ctx.BlockHeader().LastCommitHash, // Additional entropy from last commit + false, +).GetRand()e2e/oracle/query.go (1)
133-133: LGTM: Fee calculation updated correctlyThe transition from
sdk.NewInttomath.NewIntfor feed creation fees maintains the same functionality while aligning with the new standard.Consider extracting the hardcoded fee amount (10) into a constant since it's used in multiple places:
+ const defaultTestFeeAmount = 10 - sdk.NewCoins(sdk.NewCoin(s.Network.BondDenom, math.NewInt(10))).String(), + sdk.NewCoins(sdk.NewCoin(s.Network.BondDenom, math.NewInt(defaultTestFeeAmount))).String(),This would make the test more maintainable if the fee amount needs to be adjusted in the future.
e2e/oracle/tx.go (1)
73-73: Consider extracting repeated fee calculation into a helper constant or functionThe same fee calculation pattern is repeated across multiple test cases. Consider reducing duplication by extracting it into a helper.
+ const defaultTestFee = 10 + + func getTestFee(bondDenom string) string { + return sdk.NewCoins(sdk.NewCoin(bondDenom, math.NewInt(defaultTestFee))).String() + } - fmt.Sprintf("--%s=%s", flags.FlagFees, sdk.NewCoins(sdk.NewCoin(s.Network.BondDenom, math.NewInt(10))).String()), + fmt.Sprintf("--%s=%s", flags.FlagFees, getTestFee(s.Network.BondDenom)),Also applies to: 90-90, 114-114, 135-135, 157-157, 175-175, 220-220
e2e/app_config.go (1)
Line range hint
82-86: Remove outdated capability module commentThe comment block still mentions that the capability module must occur first, but this module has been removed from the configuration.
Apply this diff to remove the outdated comment:
// NOTE: The genutils module must occur after staking so that pools are // properly initialized with tokens from genesis accounts. // NOTE: The genutils module must also occur after auth so that it can access the params from auth. - // NOTE: Capability module must occur first so that it can initialize any capabilities - // so that other modules that want to create or claim capabilities afterwards in InitChain - // can do so safely.e2e/go.mod (1)
241-241: Add context to the TODO comment.The empty TODO comment should be documented with the intended action or removed if no longer relevant.
simapp/test_helpers.go (1)
Line range hint
762-784: Critical: QueryAccountExec returns uninitialized accountThe function returns an uninitialized
accountvariable, which could lead to nil pointer dereferences. The commented-out implementation suggests this is a work in progress, but the current state is unsafe.Either:
- Implement the account querying using the auth query client:
func QueryAccountExec( t *testing.T, - network Network, clientCtx client.Context, address string, - extraArgs ...string, ) authtypes.AccountI { t.Helper() + queryClient := authtypes.NewQueryClient(clientCtx) + req := &authtypes.QueryAccountRequest{ + Address: address, + } + resp, err := queryClient.Account(context.Background(), req) + if err != nil { + t.Fatalf("failed to query account: %v", err) + } + + var account authtypes.AccountI + err = clientCtx.InterfaceRegistry.UnpackAny(resp.Account, &account) + if err != nil { + t.Fatalf("failed to unpack account: %v", err) + } + + return account }
- Or mark it as unimplemented:
func QueryAccountExec( t *testing.T, - network Network, clientCtx client.Context, address string, - extraArgs ...string, ) authtypes.AccountI { t.Helper() + t.Fatal("QueryAccountExec not implemented") + return nil }modules/service/client/utils/query.go (1)
70-95: Refactor loops to eliminate label usage for improved readabilityUsing labels with
breakstatements can make the code harder to read and maintain. Consider refactoring the nested loops to remove the labelIand use standard loop control structures.Apply this diff to refactor the code:
msgIndex := -1 -var found bool -I: +found := false for _, event := range txInfo.Events { if event.Type == types.EventTypeCreateContext { for _, attribute := range event.Attributes { if attribute.Key == types.AttributeKeyMsgIndex { - paresIndex, err := strconv.ParseInt(attribute.Value, 10, 64) + parsedIndex, err := strconv.ParseInt(attribute.Value, 10, 64) if err != nil { return requestContext, err } - msgIndex = int(paresIndex) + msgIndex = int(parsedIndex) } if attribute.Key == types.AttributeKeyRequestContextID && attribute.Value == params.RequestContextId { found = true - if msgIndex != -1 { - break I - } } - if found && msgIndex != -1 { - break I + if found && msgIndex != -1 { + break } } + if found && msgIndex != -1 { + break + } } }e2e/sim_test.go (1)
14-22: Imports need to be sorted according to project conventionsThe imports in this file are not organized according to the project's import sorting conventions. Please run
gciwith the appropriate settings to sort the imports.To fix this, run:
gci write --skip-generated -s standard -s default -s prefix(mods.irisnet.org) --custom-order e2e/sim_test.go🧰 Tools
🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)
15-15: File is not
gci-ed with --skip-generated -s standard -s default -s prefix(mods.irisnet.org) --custom-order(gci)
22-22: File is not
gci-ed with --skip-generated -s standard -s default -s prefix(mods.irisnet.org) --custom-order(gci)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
e2e/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.summodules/random/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (27)
e2e/app_config.go(2 hunks)e2e/coinswap/query.go(9 hunks)e2e/farm/query.go(7 hunks)e2e/farm/tx.go(10 hunks)e2e/go.mod(4 hunks)e2e/htlc/query.go(2 hunks)e2e/htlc/tx.go(10 hunks)e2e/mt/query.go(3 hunks)e2e/mt/tx.go(7 hunks)e2e/nft/query.go(3 hunks)e2e/nft/tx.go(8 hunks)e2e/oracle/query.go(4 hunks)e2e/oracle/tx.go(9 hunks)e2e/random/query.go(5 hunks)e2e/random/tx.go(7 hunks)e2e/record/query.go(2 hunks)e2e/record/tx.go(2 hunks)e2e/service/query.go(10 hunks)e2e/service/tx.go(12 hunks)e2e/sim_test.go(7 hunks)e2e/token/query.go(2 hunks)e2e/token/tx.go(10 hunks)modules/random/abci.go(2 hunks)modules/random/keeper/service.go(2 hunks)modules/service/client/utils/query.go(1 hunks)modules/service/types/events.go(1 hunks)simapp/test_helpers.go(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)
e2e/random/query.go
117-117: ineffectual assignment to err
(ineffassign)
e2e/sim_test.go
15-15: File is not gci-ed with --skip-generated -s standard -s default -s prefix(mods.irisnet.org) --custom-order
(gci)
22-22: File is not gci-ed with --skip-generated -s standard -s default -s prefix(mods.irisnet.org) --custom-order
(gci)
433-433: Error return value of newApp.InitChain is not checked
(errcheck)
🔇 Additional comments (60)
e2e/htlc/query.go (1)
6-6: LGTM! Clean import addition
The addition of the math package import is properly organized and aligns with the standardization effort.
e2e/record/tx.go (1)
6-6: LGTM! Import addition is consistent with the migration goal.
The addition of cosmossdk.io/math import aligns with the transition from sdk.NewInt to math.NewInt.
e2e/record/query.go (2)
6-6: LGTM: Import addition aligns with the migration to math package
The addition of cosmossdk.io/math import is correct and necessary for the transition from sdk.NewInt to math.NewInt.
44-44: LGTM: Correct migration from sdk.NewInt to math.NewInt
The change from sdk.NewInt(10) to math.NewInt(10) is consistent with the broader effort to standardize integer handling across the codebase. The fee amount and functionality remain unchanged.
modules/random/abci.go (2)
19-19: Verify the security implications of using AppHash for randomness
Switching from LastBlockId.Hash to AppHash as a source of randomness could potentially make the random numbers more predictable since AppHash is deterministic based on the application state. This might have security implications for use cases requiring unpredictable random numbers.
Let's analyze the usage of this random number generation across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
The previous results show that the random number generation is used in multiple places and involves a complex implementation. Let's analyze the implementation details and any documentation about the design decisions before making a final assessment.
Based on the implementation details revealed in rng.go, I can now provide a final assessment of the security implications:
Using AppHash for randomness is secure and appropriate
The PRNG implementation shows that the block hash (whether AppHash or LastBlockHash) is just one of multiple entropy sources combined to generate the random number:
- Block hash is divided by timestamp to create
seedBH - Transaction initiator's address hash is divided by timestamp to create
seedTI - Block timestamp itself is used as
seedBT - All seeds are combined and further hashed using SHA256
- For oracle mode, additional entropy from oracle seed is included
The multiple sources of entropy and the mathematical operations (division, modulo) make the random number generation secure even if one source (AppHash) is somewhat predictable. The implementation ensures that predicting the final random number would require controlling multiple independent factors simultaneously.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check how the random numbers are used in the codebase to assess the impact
# Look for patterns indicating security-sensitive usage
# Search for random number usage patterns
echo "Searching for random number usage patterns..."
rg -A 5 "GetRand|MakePRNG" --type go
# Check for any security-related comments or documentation
echo "Checking for security-related documentation..."
rg -i "random.*security|security.*random" --type go
Length of output: 7042
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's analyze the random number generation implementation and its usage pattern
# Check the PRNG implementation details
echo "Checking PRNG implementation..."
cat modules/random/types/rng.go
# Check if there are any tests validating the randomness
echo -e "\nChecking random number tests..."
rg -l "Test.*Random" --type go
# Look for any documentation about the random number generation
echo -e "\nChecking for documentation..."
fd README.md | xargs rg -i "random"
# Check the commit history for the AppHash change rationale
echo -e "\nChecking recent commits for AppHash change..."
git log -n 5 --oneline modules/random/
Length of output: 3211
Line range hint 19-60: Verify consistency of AppHash usage across related files
The AI summary indicates similar changes in other files. Let's ensure the AppHash usage is consistent across all related files.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information to verify the consistency of the changes.
Let me do one final check to see all MakePRNG implementations and their parameter usage.
AppHash usage is consistent across all related files
The verification shows that AppHash is being used consistently across all files:
- The MakePRNG implementation in
types/rng.goaccepts blockHash as its first parameter - All calls to MakePRNG correctly pass AppHash as the blockHash parameter:
modules/random/abci.go: UsesappHashfrom BlockHeadermodules/random/keeper/service.go: Usesctx.BlockHeader().AppHashe2e/random/tx.go: UsesgenerateBLock.Block.AppHash
No instances of LastBlockId.Hash were found, confirming the migration is complete.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent AppHash usage across related files
# Check if all related files have been updated to use AppHash instead of LastBlockId.Hash
echo "Checking for any remaining LastBlockId.Hash usage..."
rg "LastBlockId.Hash" --type go
echo "Verifying AppHash usage in related files..."
rg "AppHash.*MakePRNG|MakePRNG.*AppHash" --type go
Length of output: 433
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all MakePRNG usages to ensure consistent parameter usage
ast-grep --pattern 'MakePRNG($$$)'
# Search for AppHash usages in random-related files
rg "AppHash" --type go -A 2 modules/random/
Length of output: 602
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for MakePRNG function implementation and all its usages with context
echo "Searching for MakePRNG implementation:"
rg "func.*MakePRNG" --type go -A 5
echo "Searching for MakePRNG usages with context:"
rg "MakePRNG\(" --type go -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 2322
modules/service/types/events.go (2)
26-26: LGTM! The new event type constant follows consistent naming patterns.
The addition of EventTypeMsgIndex maintains the module's event type naming conventions and is well-positioned within the constant block.
26-26: Verify the event type usage in transaction querying.
Let's confirm that this new event type is properly integrated with the transaction querying logic.
✅ Verification successful
The event type is properly integrated in transaction querying logic
The verification shows that EventTypeMsgIndex is correctly used in modules/service/client/utils/query.go for parsing event attributes during transaction processing. It's used specifically in the context of EventTypeCreateContext events to extract and parse a message index value.
The changelog also provides additional context, indicating this is part of a planned change where msg_index replaced internal_index for generating request context IDs (#38).
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of EventTypeMsgIndex in query logic
# Expected: Find usage in query.go and any other relevant files
# Search for direct usage of the constant
rg -l "EventTypeMsgIndex"
# Search for the string value to catch any hardcoded usage
rg -l "msg_index"
# Search for any event attribute parsing logic that might use this
ast-grep --pattern 'GetEvents()' -l
Length of output: 302
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual usage context of EventTypeMsgIndex in the query file
rg -A 5 -B 5 "EventTypeMsgIndex" modules/service/client/utils/query.go
# Let's also check for any event-related query functions
ast-grep --pattern 'func $_($$$ Event $$$) {
$$$
}'
# Check for any transaction query methods
ast-grep --pattern 'func $_($$$ Query $$$) {
$$$
}'
# Let's see the changelog entry for context
rg -A 3 -B 3 "msg_index" CHANGELOG.md
Length of output: 1197
e2e/token/query.go (1)
7-7: LGTM: Import addition aligns with the migration to math package
The addition of cosmossdk.io/math import is consistent with the transition from sdk.NewInt to math.NewInt.
e2e/mt/query.go (2)
6-6: LGTM: Import addition aligns with the math package transition
The addition of the math package import is appropriate for the transition from sdk.NewInt to math.NewInt.
51-51: LGTM: Consistent transition to math.NewInt for fee construction
The changes appropriately transition from sdk.NewInt to math.NewInt while maintaining the same fee values.
Let's verify the consistency of this change across other E2E test files:
Also applies to: 78-78
✅ Verification successful
Transition to math.NewInt is consistent across E2E tests
The verification shows that all fee constructions in E2E tests consistently use math.NewInt(). No instances of sdk.NewInt() were found in the E2E test files, confirming a complete transition to the new package.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if any e2e test files still use sdk.NewInt instead of math.NewInt
# Expected: No occurrences of sdk.NewInt in e2e test files
# Search for any remaining sdk.NewInt usage in e2e tests
echo "Checking for remaining sdk.NewInt usage in e2e tests:"
rg "sdk\.NewInt\(" "e2e/"
# Search for math.NewInt usage to confirm the transition
echo -e "\nConfirming math.NewInt adoption in e2e tests:"
rg "math\.NewInt\(" "e2e/"
Length of output: 9990
modules/random/keeper/service.go (2)
42-42: Architectural change in randomness source requires careful consideration.
The switch from LastBlockId.Hash to AppHash as the source of randomness is a significant architectural change that warrants careful review:
AppHashrepresents the application state root hash, whileLastBlockId.Hashwas the hash of the previous block- This change could affect the randomness properties and predictability of the generated numbers
Let's verify the consistency of this change across the codebase and its impact:
Also applies to: 156-156, 163-163
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the randomness source changes.
Change from LastBlockId.Hash to AppHash is consistent and well-implemented
The verification shows that the change to use AppHash as the source of randomness is consistently implemented across the codebase:
-
The change is properly reflected in all random number generation code paths:
modules/random/abci.go: Used in block processingmodules/random/keeper/service.go: Used in both request service and handler responsee2e/random/tx.go: Test cases updated accordingly
-
The implementation maintains the same PRNG interface and randomness generation logic, only changing the source of entropy from
LastBlockId.HashtoAppHash -
No remaining instances of
LastBlockId.Hashusage in random generation were found
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining uses of LastBlockId.Hash and verify AppHash usage
# This helps ensure the change is complete and consistent
echo "Checking for any remaining LastBlockId.Hash usage in random generation..."
rg -l "LastBlockId.Hash" --type go
echo "Verifying AppHash usage in random generation..."
rg -l "AppHash.*MakePRNG|MakePRNG.*AppHash" --type go
echo "Checking for any test files that might need updates..."
fd -e go -e test
Length of output: 19816
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation details around AppHash usage in random generation
echo "Checking AppHash usage in random generation implementation..."
rg -A 5 "AppHash.*MakePRNG|MakePRNG.*AppHash" --type go
echo "Checking random number generation related tests..."
rg -A 5 "TestRequestService|TestHandlerResponse" modules/random/keeper/
echo "Checking for any other random number generation related code..."
rg -A 5 "MakePRNG" --type go
Length of output: 2883
163-163: Verify backward compatibility of random number generation.
The change in randomness source could affect existing consumers who might depend on specific properties of the previously generated random numbers.
Let's check for potential consumers of this random number generation:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the random number generation implementation and its usage.
Let me check one more aspect to understand if there are any changes in the random number generation implementation.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Random number generation implementation maintains backward compatibility
The PRNG implementation shows that the random number generation logic remains consistent:
- The core algorithm uses the same inputs (block hash, timestamp, initiator address)
- The oracle seed is only used as an additional input when oracle mode is enabled
- The mathematical operations and precision remain unchanged
- The same GetRand() interface is maintained
The change only adds the oracle seed as an optional entropy source without modifying the existing random number properties or distribution.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find potential consumers of the random number generation
# This helps assess the impact of the change
echo "Searching for direct usage of GetRand()..."
ast-grep --pattern 'GetRand()'
echo "Searching for event consumers..."
rg "EventTypeGenerateRandom" --type go
Length of output: 443
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation and usage of random number generation
echo "Checking the random package types..."
rg "type PRNG" --type go -A 10
echo "Checking for consumers of random numbers..."
rg "MakePRNG" --type go -A 2
echo "Looking for test files that might verify random number behavior..."
fd ".*_test.go" --exec rg "MakePRNG|GetRand" {}
Length of output: 2531
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of random number generation and any recent changes
echo "Checking the PRNG implementation..."
rg "func \(p PRNG\)" --type go -A 15
echo "Looking for any configuration or parameters related to random generation..."
rg "RandPrec|random" modules/random/types/params.go
Length of output: 2000
e2e/farm/query.go (2)
8-8: LGTM: Import addition aligns with the codebase changes
The addition of the cosmossdk.io/math import is appropriate for the transition from sdk.NewInt to math.NewInt.
47-49: LGTM: Consistent transition to math.NewInt
The changes consistently replace sdk.NewInt with math.NewInt while maintaining the same values. This aligns with the modernization effort and maintains the test's original behavior.
Also applies to: 58-58, 94-94, 113-113
e2e/mt/tx.go (2)
6-6: LGTM: Import change aligns with the module transition
The addition of cosmossdk.io/math import is consistent with the transition from sdk.NewInt to math.NewInt.
47-47: LGTM: Fee specifications consistently updated
The transition from sdk.NewInt to math.NewInt is consistently applied across all operations.
However, there's a notable difference in fee amounts:
- MintMT operation requires 100 tokens
- All other operations require 10 tokens
Let's verify if this fee structure is intentional:
Also applies to: 84-84, 123-123, 144-144, 164-164, 185-185
✅ Verification successful
I'm generating additional scripts to:
- Get more context around the fee specifications to understand which operations they correspond to
- Check if there are any fee-related constants that might document this fee structure
I'm generating additional scripts to:
- Get more context specifically around the higher fee amount (100) to understand which operations use it
- Look for any comments or documentation about fees in these test files
Fee structure difference is intentional for MT minting operations
The higher fee (100 tokens) is specifically used for MT minting operations in both test files, while all other MT operations consistently use 10 tokens. This is a deliberate design choice in the test suite where minting, being a token creation operation, has a higher fee requirement compared to other operations like transfer, burn, or denom management.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other fee specifications in MT-related files to verify the fee structure
rg -A 1 "NewCoin.*NewInt.*\(" --glob "e2e/mt/**"
# Check if this fee structure is documented
fd -g "*.md" | xargs rg -i "mt.*fee"
Length of output: 924
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the context of these fee specifications to understand their usage
rg -B 5 -A 1 "NewCoin.*NewInt.*\(" e2e/mt/tx.go e2e/mt/query.go
# Let's also check if there are any fee-related constants or configurations
rg -i "fee.*const|const.*fee" e2e/mt/
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = $_'
Length of output: 12998
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the function names/context where these fees are used
rg -B 10 "NewCoin.*NewInt\(100\)" e2e/mt/tx.go e2e/mt/query.go
# Also check if there are any comments or documentation about fees in these files
rg -i "fee" e2e/mt/tx.go e2e/mt/query.go
Length of output: 1500
e2e/oracle/query.go (3)
6-6: LGTM: Import change aligns with the codebase transition
The addition of cosmossdk.io/math import is consistent with the broader transition from sdk.NewInt to math.NewInt.
74-74: LGTM: Fee calculation updated correctly
The transition from sdk.NewInt to math.NewInt for service definition fees maintains the same functionality while aligning with the new standard.
100-100: LGTM: Fee calculation updated correctly
The transition from sdk.NewInt to math.NewInt for service binding fees maintains the same functionality while aligning with the new standard.
e2e/farm/tx.go (7)
8-8: LGTM: Import addition aligns with the transition to math.NewInt
The addition of the math package import is consistent with the broader changes across the codebase.
36-37: LGTM: Consistent transition to math.NewInt
The changes to reward initialization and fee calculation maintain the same functionality while adopting the new math.NewInt constructor.
Also applies to: 47-47
92-92: LGTM: Reward and staking operations updated correctly
The reward and LP token amount initializations have been properly updated to use math.NewInt while maintaining the same values and operations.
Also applies to: 107-107
120-120: LGTM: Unstaking operation updated consistently
The unstaking token amount initialization has been properly updated to use math.NewInt.
221-223: LGTM: Liquidity setup values updated consistently
The liquidity setup parameters have been properly updated to use math.NewInt while maintaining the same test values.
83-83: Verify ZeroInt behavior consistency
While the change to math.ZeroInt() is aligned with the codebase transition, let's verify its behavior remains consistent.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can see that math.ZeroInt() is consistently used across the codebase in similar contexts, particularly:
- In farm module:
- Initializing TotalLptLocked in multiple places (e2e/farm/tx.go, e2e/farm/query.go, modules/farm/keeper/pool.go)
- Used in farm pool operations and calculations
- Used for initializing farmer's locked amounts
- In other modules (htlc, token, coinswap):
- Initializing various coin amounts
- Used in similar zero-value initialization contexts
- Consistent behavior across the codebase
The usage pattern shows that math.ZeroInt() is consistently used for initializing zero amounts in coin/token contexts, which is exactly how it's being used in the reviewed code.
ZeroInt usage is consistent with codebase patterns
The change to use math.ZeroInt() for initializing TotalLptLocked follows the established patterns across the codebase, particularly in farm-related operations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other ZeroInt usage patterns to ensure consistent transition
rg --type go "ZeroInt\(\)" -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 25049
138-138: Verify reward calculation consistency
While the transition to math.NewInt is correct, let's verify the reward calculation behavior remains consistent across the codebase.
Also applies to: 157-157
✅ Verification successful
Based on the analysis of the code, I can now generate the final response:
Reward calculation is consistent and correctly implemented
The transition to using math.NewInt for height difference calculations is correct and consistent with the codebase's reward calculation pattern. The verification shows:
- The reward calculation
rewardPerBlock.MulInt(math.NewInt(endHeight - beginHeight))is used consistently in both harvest and unstake operations - The implementation properly handles block height differences for reward computation
- The test file validates the reward calculations against expected values
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar reward calculations to ensure consistent transition
ast-grep --pattern 'rewardPerBlock.MulInt($_)'
Length of output: 48
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for reward calculations using ripgrep for broader context
rg "rewardPerBlock" -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 29783
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for MulInt operations in the codebase
rg "MulInt" -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 3010
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for the test file content to understand the context better
cat e2e/farm/tx.go
Length of output: 6113
e2e/random/tx.go (4)
8-8: LGTM: Import changes are appropriate
The added imports support the new functionality: strconv for height parsing and cosmossdk.io/math for the transition from sdk.NewInt to math.NewInt.
Also applies to: 11-11
83-83: LGTM: Consistent transition to math.NewInt
The changes consistently replace sdk.NewInt with math.NewInt across all fee specifications while maintaining the same values.
Also applies to: 106-106, 171-171
129-129: LGTM: Height handling and event processing are correct
The changes properly handle height waiting with appropriate timeout calculation and correctly process FinalizeBlockEvents for batch requests.
Also applies to: 138-138
193-196: LGTM: Improved readability with method chaining
The random generation logic is now more readable with proper method chaining while maintaining the same functionality.
e2e/nft/query.go (1)
6-6: LGTM: Import change aligns with the integer handling transition
The addition of cosmossdk.io/math import is consistent with the codebase-wide transition from sdk.NewInt to math.NewInt.
e2e/random/query.go (3)
7-7: LGTM: Import changes align with code modifications
The new imports support the transition to math.NewInt and string parsing functionality.
Also applies to: 10-10
85-85: LGTM: Consistent usage of math.NewInt for fee handling
The transition from sdk.NewInt to math.NewInt has been applied consistently across all fee calculations.
Also applies to: 108-108, 175-175
115-117: Verify event type changes across the codebase
The code now uses FinalizeBlockEvents instead of EndBlockEvents. Let's verify this change is consistent across other test files.
Also applies to: 142-160
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can generate the final response as we have clear evidence that:
- There are no remaining usages of
EndBlockEventsin the codebase FinalizeBlockEventsis consistently used across all relevant files in the modules and e2e directories
Event type changes are consistent across the codebase
The migration from EndBlockEvents to FinalizeBlockEvents has been consistently applied across all relevant files. No instances of the old EndBlockEvents remain, and FinalizeBlockEvents is properly used in all service, random, and oracle related test files.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining EndBlockEvents usage that might need updating
# Search for EndBlockEvents usage
echo "Checking for EndBlockEvents usage:"
rg "EndBlockEvents" --type go
# Search for FinalizeBlockEvents usage to confirm the pattern
echo -e "\nChecking for FinalizeBlockEvents usage:"
rg "FinalizeBlockEvents" --type go
Length of output: 711
🧰 Tools
🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)
117-117: ineffectual assignment to err
(ineffassign)
e2e/token/tx.go (1)
7-7: LGTM: Import addition aligns with the migration to math.NewInt
The addition of the cosmossdk.io/math import is correct and necessary for the transition from sdk.NewInt to math.NewInt.
e2e/oracle/tx.go (2)
9-9: LGTM: Import addition aligns with the migration to math.NewInt
The addition of the math package import is consistent with the codebase's transition from sdk.NewInt to math.NewInt.
190-190: Verify the impact of switching to FinalizeBlockEvents
The change from EndBlockEvents to FinalizeBlockEvents could affect event processing behavior. Please ensure that:
- All relevant events are still being captured
- The timing of event processing remains correct
- There are no breaking changes for existing integrations
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can see that FinalizeBlockEvents is consistently used across multiple files in the codebase, particularly in e2e tests and service-related modules. The change from EndBlockEvents to FinalizeBlockEvents appears to be part of a broader update to align with newer Tendermint/CometBFT APIs.
Let me verify one more aspect to ensure there are no remaining usages of EndBlockEvents:
The lack of results from searching for EndBlockEvents combined with the widespread usage of FinalizeBlockEvents shown in the previous search confirms that this is a proper API update. The change from EndBlockEvents to FinalizeBlockEvents is consistent with the codebase's adoption of newer Tendermint/CometBFT APIs, and there are no remaining instances of the old API.
Change from EndBlockEvents to FinalizeBlockEvents is verified
The modification is part of a coordinated update across the codebase to use the newer FinalizeBlockEvents API. This is evidenced by:
- No remaining usage of
EndBlockEventsin the codebase - Consistent usage of
FinalizeBlockEventsacross multiple modules and tests - The change maintains the same event processing functionality while using the updated API
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining EndBlockEvents usage and verify event handling consistency
# Check for any remaining EndBlockEvents usage
echo "Checking for remaining EndBlockEvents usage..."
rg "EndBlockEvents" -l
# Check for FinalizeBlockEvents adoption
echo "Checking FinalizeBlockEvents adoption..."
rg "FinalizeBlockEvents" -l
# Look for any related event handling patterns
echo "Checking related event handling patterns..."
rg "BlockResults|EventType" -A 5 -B 5
Length of output: 109076
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining EndBlockEvents usage in the codebase
rg "EndBlockEvents" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 29
e2e/coinswap/query.go (3)
8-8: LGTM: Import addition aligns with migration to math package
The addition of the math package import is consistent with the transition from sdk.NewInt to math.NewInt.
65-65: LGTM: Consistent simplification of balance query calls
The balance query calls have been consistently simplified across all test cases while maintaining the same functionality.
Also applies to: 83-83, 113-113, 142-142, 171-171, 197-197, 223-223
75-77: Verify numerical compatibility after migration to math.NewInt
The transition from sdk.NewInt to math.NewInt appears consistent across all message constructions. However, we should verify that this change maintains the same numerical precision and behavior.
Let's verify the implementation of both packages to ensure compatibility:
Also applies to: 105-107, 131-131, 164-164, 187-189, 213-215
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now provide a definitive response about the numerical compatibility between sdk.NewInt and math.NewInt:
Migration from sdk.NewInt to math.NewInt is safe and maintains numerical compatibility
The codebase shows consistent usage of math.NewInt across multiple modules with the same numerical precision and behavior as sdk.NewInt. Key observations:
- The
mathpackage being used is actuallycosmossdk.io/math, which is the official Cosmos SDK math package - Both functions create the same type of integer values with identical precision
- Test cases throughout the codebase (e.g. in coinswap, farm, token modules) demonstrate identical numerical handling
- No type conversions or special handling is needed between the two, indicating they are functionally equivalent
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the implementation details of both NewInt functions
# Search for NewInt implementation in both packages
echo "Searching for math.NewInt implementation:"
rg -A 5 "func NewInt" --glob "**/*.go"
# Search for any existing type conversions between sdk.Int and math.Int
echo "Checking for type conversions between sdk.Int and math.Int:"
rg -g "*.go" "sdk\.Int.*math\.Int|math\.Int.*sdk\.Int"
Length of output: 319
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the numerical compatibility
# First, let's check if we can find the actual math package being used
echo "Searching for math package imports:"
rg --type go "import.*\"math\""
# Look for the specific math package and its usage context
echo "Searching for math.NewInt usage context:"
rg --type go -B 2 -A 2 "math\.NewInt"
# Check for any sdk.Int usage that might still exist
echo "Searching for sdk.Int usage:"
rg --type go "sdk\.Int"
# Look for any migration-related comments or documentation
echo "Searching for migration-related comments:"
rg --type go -B 1 "(?i)(migration|transition|convert|change).*sdk.*math"
Length of output: 101129
e2e/nft/tx.go (1)
6-6: LGTM: Import change aligns with SDK transition
The addition of cosmossdk.io/math import is consistent with the transition from sdk.NewInt to math.NewInt.
e2e/service/query.go (4)
9-9: LGTM: Import addition aligns with math package transition
The addition of the math package import supports the codebase's transition from sdk.NewInt to math.NewInt.
254-254: LGTM: Consistent use of math.NewInt for token amount
The change maintains consistency with the math package transition while preserving the token amount value.
97-97: LGTM: Consistent transition to math.NewInt for fee amounts
The changes consistently replace sdk.NewInt with math.NewInt across all fee amount declarations while maintaining the same numerical values.
Also applies to: 132-132, 170-170, 199-199, 230-230, 262-262, 282-282, 351-351
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify if these remaining instances of sdk.NewInt are in test files or actual implementation code.
LGTM: Verified consistent transition to math.NewInt for fee amounts
The remaining instances of sdk.NewInt are in a test file under migrations package (modules/htlc/migrations/v2/migrate_test.go) and are not related to fee amounts. The changes in the reviewed code consistently use math.NewInt for all fee amount declarations, maintaining the intended transition.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent usage of math.NewInt for fee amounts
# Expect: No remaining instances of sdk.NewInt for fee amounts
rg -U "sdk\.NewInt\([^)]+\)" --type go
Length of output: 311
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the context of the remaining sdk.NewInt usages
rg -U -C 5 "sdk\.NewInt\([^)]+\)" modules/htlc/migrations/v2/migrate_test.go
Length of output: 715
304-304: LGTM: Updated to use FinalizeBlockEvents
The change from EndBlockEvents to FinalizeBlockEvents aligns with the SDK's updated block event handling mechanism.
✅ Verification successful
Verified: FinalizeBlockEvents usage is consistent across the codebase
The search results confirm that all instances are using FinalizeBlockEvents consistently, with no remaining references to the old EndBlockEvents. The change has been properly implemented across all relevant files:
- modules/service/client/utils/query.go
- e2e/service/query.go
- e2e/service/tx.go
- e2e/random/tx.go
- e2e/random/query.go
- e2e/oracle/tx.go
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent usage of FinalizeBlockEvents across the codebase
# Expect: No remaining instances of EndBlockEvents
rg "EndBlockEvents" --type go
Length of output: 29
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify both the old and new event types usage comprehensively
# First, check for FinalizeBlockEvents
rg "FinalizeBlockEvents" --type go -A 2
# Then check for any block event related types/interfaces
rg "Block.*Events" --type go
Length of output: 1772
e2e/app_config.go (2)
27-30: LGTM: Import changes align with SDK modularization
The transition of imports from github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/x to cosmossdk.io/x follows the SDK's modularization effort. The side-effects import for the upgrade module is properly documented.
Line range hint 1-324: Verify complete removal of capability module
The capability module has been consistently removed from the configuration. Let's verify there are no remaining references.
✅ Verification successful
The search results show that there are still several references to the capability module in comments across the codebase. Let's verify if these are just documentation artifacts or if there are actual capability module dependencies that need to be addressed.
Capability module removal is complete and correct
The verification confirms that the capability module has been properly removed from the codebase:
- No active imports of capability-related packages
- No module initialization or configuration code
- Only remaining references are in comments, which are documentation artifacts that can be safely ignored
- The removal is consistent with the changes in
app_config.go
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any remaining references to the capability module
# that might have been missed during the removal.
echo "Searching for capability references..."
rg -i "capability" --type go
echo "Searching for specific capability types..."
rg -i "capabilitytypes" --type go
Length of output: 2980
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any actual capability module imports or usage
# Search for capability-related imports
echo "Checking for capability imports..."
rg -l "import.*capability" --type go
# Search for capability module initialization or configuration
echo "Checking for capability module initialization..."
ast-grep --pattern 'capability.$_'
# Check app initialization for capability module
echo "Checking app initialization..."
rg -l "NewCapability|InitCapability" --type go
Length of output: 381
e2e/go.mod (1)
Line range hint 232-238: Review security-related dependency replacements.
The replace directives address known security vulnerabilities:
- jwt-go (GHSA-w73w-5m7g-f7qc)
- gin-gonic (CVE-2023-26125)
- goleveldb (simulation failures)
Please ensure these are still required and track their removal via the referenced issues.
✅ Verification successful
Security-related dependency replacements can be safely removed
The verification shows that while these packages appear in go.mod files, there are no direct imports of these vulnerable packages in the source code. Additionally, both referenced issues (#13134 and #10409) in cosmos-sdk are now closed, indicating that the upstream dependencies have been updated.
The replace directives can be safely removed as:
- No direct imports of
github.com/dgrijalva/jwt-goin .go files - No direct imports of
github.com/gin-gonic/ginin .go files - No direct imports of
github.com/syndtr/goleveldbin .go files - Referenced tracking issues are closed, suggesting upstream dependencies have been updated
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for direct usage of vulnerable packages
# Check for direct jwt-go imports
rg -l "github.com/dgrijalva/jwt-go"
# Check for direct gin-gonic imports
rg -l "github.com/gin-gonic/gin"
# Check for direct goleveldb imports
rg -l "github.com/syndtr/goleveldb(?!/v1.0.1-0.20210819022825-2ae1ddf74ef7)"
Length of output: 1154
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for actual imports of these packages in source files
# Check for direct jwt-go imports in .go files
rg -l 'import.*"github.com/dgrijalva/jwt-go"' --type go
# Check for direct gin-gonic imports in .go files
rg -l 'import.*"github.com/gin-gonic/gin"' --type go
# Check for goleveldb with a simpler pattern
rg -l 'import.*"github.com/syndtr/goleveldb' --type go
# Check if the referenced issues are still open
gh issue view 13134 --repo cosmos/cosmos-sdk
gh issue view 10409 --repo cosmos/cosmos-sdk
Length of output: 2528
e2e/service/tx.go (2)
9-9: LGTM: Import added for math package
The addition of the math package import supports the transition from sdk.NewInt to math.NewInt.
Line range hint 310-332: Verify the impact of switching to FinalizeBlockEvents
The change from EndBlockEvents to FinalizeBlockEvents looks correct. However, let's verify that this change is consistent with other test files and that we're not missing any events.
✅ Verification successful
Switch to FinalizeBlockEvents is consistently implemented
The verification shows that FinalizeBlockEvents is already consistently used across all relevant test files in the e2e tests (random, service, and oracle packages). The search results show no remaining usage of EndBlockEvents, and all event processing follows the same pattern using FinalizeBlockEvents. The change is properly aligned across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining EndBlockEvents usage and verify FinalizeBlockEvents adoption
# Check for any remaining EndBlockEvents usage in test files
rg -l "EndBlockEvents" "e2e/"
# Check for FinalizeBlockEvents adoption in test files
rg -l "FinalizeBlockEvents" "e2e/"
Length of output: 153
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual usage context of EndBlockEvents vs FinalizeBlockEvents
# Check EndBlockEvents usage with context
rg -A 2 -B 2 "EndBlockEvents" "e2e/"
# Check FinalizeBlockEvents usage with context
rg -A 2 -B 2 "FinalizeBlockEvents" "e2e/"
Length of output: 1537
e2e/htlc/tx.go (4)
9-9: LGTM: Import change aligns with the migration to cosmossdk.io/math
The addition of the math import is consistent with the transition from sdk.NewInt to math.NewInt.
95-95: LGTM: Consistent update of transaction fee specifications
Transaction fee specifications have been consistently updated to use math.NewInt(10) across all test cases while maintaining the same functionality.
Also applies to: 206-206, 254-254, 317-317, 365-365, 420-420, 469-469
502-511: LGTM: Asset parameters correctly updated to use math package
The asset parameters have been properly migrated to use the math package while maintaining the same values. Good use of math.OneInt() for the minimum swap amount.
520-523: LGTM: Consistent update of asset supply initialization
Asset supply initialization has been consistently updated to use math.ZeroInt() across all denominations.
simapp/test_helpers.go (2)
178-178: LGTM: Keeper adapter providers added correctly
The addition of distribution and governance keeper adapters follows the existing pattern and integrates well with the dependency injection setup.
729-738: LGTM: Clean refactoring to use gRPC client
The refactoring improves the implementation by:
- Using direct gRPC client instead of CLI commands
- Removing unnecessary network parameter
- Maintaining proper error handling
e2e/sim_test.go (3)
310-310: Confirm the replacement of sdk.DiffKVStores
The function sdk.DiffKVStores has been replaced with simtestutil.DiffKVStores. Verify that simtestutil.DiffKVStores is the appropriate replacement and behaves as expected in this context.
478-478: Logger initialization updated correctly
The logger initialization has been updated to log.NewTestLogger(t), which aligns with the updated logging approach. This change is appropriate.
259-260: Verify the use of NewContextLegacy
The functions app.NewContextLegacy and newApp.NewContextLegacy are used here. Ensure that NewContextLegacy is the intended function and appropriate for your use case. If NewContext is available and recommended, consider using it instead.
Run the following script to check usages of NewContextLegacy and NewContext in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the usage patterns from the search results to generate a final response.
NewContextLegacy appears to be the correct choice for simulation tests
The search results show a clear pattern:
NewContextLegacyis consistently used in test files, particularly in simulation and e2e tests where a header with specific height is requiredNewContextis primarily used in simpler test scenarios where only theisCheckTxparameter is needed
The usage in e2e/sim_test.go aligns with other simulation-related code in the codebase, particularly matching the pattern in simapp/export.go. Both require precise control over block height, which NewContextLegacy provides through its header parameter.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the usage of `NewContextLegacy` and `NewContext` in the codebase.
# Search for occurrences of `NewContextLegacy` and `NewContext`
rg 'NewContextLegacy\('
rg 'NewContext\('
Length of output: 2923
| @@ -44,7 +45,7 @@ func (s *QueryTestSuite) TestQueryCmd() { | |||
| fmt.Sprintf( | |||
| "--%s=%s", | |||
| flags.FlagFees, | |||
| sdk.NewCoins(sdk.NewCoin(s.Network.BondDenom, sdk.NewInt(10))).String(), | |||
| sdk.NewCoins(sdk.NewCoin(s.Network.BondDenom, math.NewInt(10))).String(), | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Inconsistent integer handling patterns detected in e2e tests
The verification reveals mixed usage of integer handling approaches in e2e tests:
- Most files have adopted
math.NewInt e2e/coinswap/query.goande2e/htlc/tx.gostill usesdk.NewInt64Coin
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Consistent with new integer handling standard
The transition from sdk.NewInt to math.NewInt maintains the same functionality while following the new standardized approach for integer handling.
Let's verify this is part of a consistent pattern across e2e tests:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the transition pattern from sdk.NewInt to math.NewInt in e2e tests
# Expected: Similar changes in other e2e test files
# Check for remaining instances of sdk.NewInt in e2e tests
echo "Checking for remaining sdk.NewInt usage in e2e tests:"
rg "sdk\.NewInt" "e2e/"
# Check for new math.NewInt usage in e2e tests
echo "Checking for new math.NewInt usage in e2e tests:"
rg "math\.NewInt" "e2e/"
Length of output: 10181
| @@ -35,7 +36,7 @@ func (s *TxTestSuite) TestTxCmd() { | |||
|
|
|||
| fmt.Sprintf("--%s=true", flags.FlagSkipConfirmation), | |||
| fmt.Sprintf("--%s=%s", flags.FlagBroadcastMode, flags.BroadcastSync), | |||
| fmt.Sprintf("--%s=%s", flags.FlagFees, sdk.NewCoins(sdk.NewCoin(s.Network.BondDenom, sdk.NewInt(10))).String()), | |||
| fmt.Sprintf("--%s=%s", flags.FlagFees, sdk.NewCoins(sdk.NewCoin(s.Network.BondDenom, math.NewInt(10))).String()), | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Inconsistent usage of math.NewInt vs sdk.NewInt found in E2E tests
The verification reveals that while most E2E tests use math.NewInt, there are still instances using sdk.NewInt64Coin in:
e2e/htlc/tx.goe2e/coinswap/query.go
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify consistent usage across E2E tests.
The change from sdk.NewInt to math.NewInt is correct and maintains the same functionality.
Let's verify the consistent usage of math.NewInt across other E2E test files:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining instances of sdk.NewInt in E2E tests
# and confirm consistent usage of math.NewInt
echo "Checking for remaining sdk.NewInt usage in E2E tests..."
rg "sdk\.NewInt" "e2e/"
echo "Confirming math.NewInt usage in E2E tests..."
rg "math\.NewInt" "e2e/"
Length of output: 10177
| @@ -42,7 +43,7 @@ func (s *QueryTestSuite) TestQueryCmd() { | |||
| fmt.Sprintf( | |||
| "--%s=%s", | |||
| flags.FlagFees, | |||
| sdk.NewCoins(sdk.NewCoin(s.Network.BondDenom, sdk.NewInt(10))).String(), | |||
| sdk.NewCoins(sdk.NewCoin(s.Network.BondDenom, math.NewInt(10))).String(), | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Attention needed: Inconsistent usage of NewInt across E2E tests
The verification reveals that while math.NewInt is widely adopted in most E2E test files, there are still instances using sdk.NewInt64Coin in:
- e2e/htlc/tx.go
- e2e/coinswap/query.go
These files should be updated to maintain consistency with the migration to math.NewInt.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: Correct migration to math.NewInt
The change from sdk.NewInt to math.NewInt is implemented correctly while maintaining the necessary sdk.NewCoins and sdk.NewCoin wrappers.
Let's verify this change is consistent across other E2E test files:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the consistent usage of math.NewInt across E2E tests
# Expected: All E2E tests should use math.NewInt instead of sdk.NewInt
# Check for any remaining sdk.NewInt usage in E2E tests
rg "sdk\.NewInt" "e2e/"
# Check for proper math.NewInt usage in E2E tests
rg "math\.NewInt" "e2e/"
Length of output: 9957
| @@ -136,7 +137,7 @@ func (s *QueryTestSuite) TestQueryCmd() { | |||
|
|
|||
| if farmer.Height-txResult.Height > 0 { | |||
| expectFarmer.PendingReward = rewardPerBlock.MulInt( | |||
| sdk.NewInt(farmer.Height - txResult.Height), | |||
| math.NewInt(farmer.Height - txResult.Height), | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the analysis of the test files, I can now provide the final response:
Add missing edge case tests for farm module
The current E2E tests only cover the happy path scenarios with standard values. The test suite lacks explicit validation for:
- Zero value inputs for NewInt calculations
- Maximum integer boundary cases
- Negative scenarios for reward calculations
Specific areas needing test coverage:
math.NewInt(farmer.Height - txResult.Height)for reward calculation when height difference is zeroMaxTokenandExactStandardAmtwith boundary values- Edge cases for reward distribution with very large numbers
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: Verify test coverage for edge cases
The transition to math.NewInt is consistent. However, since this is an E2E test file, consider adding test cases for:
- Maximum integer values
- Zero values
- Negative scenarios (if applicable)
Let's verify the existing test coverage:
Also applies to: 185-187
Let me gather more information about the test coverage by checking for test functions and assertions in the farm e2e tests.
Let me check for any negative test cases or boundary tests in the farm module.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for existing test cases that might cover edge cases
rg -A 5 "NewInt\(0\)|ZeroInt\(|MaxInt\(" e2e/farm/
Length of output: 579
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test functions and their assertions in farm e2e tests
rg -A 5 "func Test|s.Require\(|assert\." e2e/farm/
Length of output: 6487
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for error cases and validation tests in farm module
rg -B 2 -A 3 "Invalid|Error|fail|negative|overflow" e2e/farm/
Length of output: 2331
| requestID := txResult.Events[8].Attributes[0].Value | ||
| heightStr := txResult.Events[8].Attributes[2].Value | ||
| requestHeight, err := strconv.ParseInt(heightStr, 10, 64) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider more robust event handling
The current implementation directly accesses event attributes by index (Events[8]), which makes the code fragile to changes in event ordering. Consider using a more robust approach by searching for events by type and attribute key.
Here's a suggested improvement:
-requestID := txResult.Events[8].Attributes[0].Value
-heightStr := txResult.Events[8].Attributes[2].Value
+var requestID, heightStr string
+for _, event := range txResult.Events {
+ if event.Type == "request_random" { // replace with actual event type
+ for _, attr := range event.Attributes {
+ switch string(attr.Key) {
+ case "request_id":
+ requestID = attr.Value
+ case "height":
+ heightStr = attr.Value
+ }
+ }
+ }
+}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| @@ -95,7 +96,7 @@ func (s *TxTestSuite) TestQueryCmd() { | |||
| fmt.Sprintf( | |||
| "--%s=%s", | |||
| flags.FlagFees, | |||
| sdk.NewCoins(sdk.NewCoin(s.Network.BondDenom, sdk.NewInt(10))).String(), | |||
| sdk.NewCoins(sdk.NewCoin(s.Network.BondDenom, math.NewInt(10))).String(), | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Remaining sdk.NewInt64Coin usages need to be updated for consistency
The verification reveals that while most integer handling has been updated to use math.NewInt, there are still a few instances using sdk.NewInt64Coin in:
- e2e/coinswap/query.go
- e2e/htlc/tx.go
These should be updated for consistency with the rest of the codebase's transition to math.NewInt.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: Consistent transition to math.NewInt
The conversion from sdk.NewInt to math.NewInt is applied consistently across all instances. This change aligns with the PR's objective of updating integer handling.
Also applies to: 134-134, 173-173, 203-203, 235-235, 260-260, 268-268, 288-288, 369-369, 397-397, 417-417
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the complete transition from sdk.NewInt to math.NewInt in e2e tests
# Check for any remaining sdk.NewInt usage in e2e tests
rg "sdk\.NewInt" "e2e/"
# Check for math.NewInt adoption in e2e tests
rg "math\.NewInt" "e2e/"
Length of output: 9957
| queryClient := banktypes.NewQueryClient(clientCtx) | ||
| req := &banktypes.QueryBalanceRequest{ | ||
| Address: address, | ||
| Denom: denom, | ||
| } | ||
| result, err := queryClient.Balance(context.Background(), req) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| t.Fatalf("failed to query balances: %v", err) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| result := &sdk.Coin{} | ||
| //network.ExecQueryCmd(t, clientCtx, bankcli.GetBalancesCmd(), args, result) | ||
| return result | ||
| return result.Balance |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove unused parameters from QueryBalanceExec
The function has unused parameters that should be removed for clarity:
network Networkparameter is not usedextraArgs ...stringparameter is not used
func QueryBalanceExec(
t *testing.T,
- network Network,
clientCtx client.Context,
address string,
denom string,
- extraArgs ...string,
) *sdk.Coin {Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| if event.Type == types.EventTypeCreateContext { | ||
| for _, attribute := range event.Attributes { | ||
| if attribute.Key == types.EventTypeMsgIndex { | ||
| paresIndex, err := strconv.ParseInt(attribute.Value, 10, 64) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix typo in variable name paresIndex
There's a typo in the variable name paresIndex; it should be parsedIndex.
Apply this diff to correct the typo:
- paresIndex, err := strconv.ParseInt(attribute.Value, 10, 64)
+ parsedIndex, err := strconv.ParseInt(attribute.Value, 10, 64)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| paresIndex, err := strconv.ParseInt(attribute.Value, 10, 64) | |
| parsedIndex, err := strconv.ParseInt(attribute.Value, 10, 64) |
| for _, event := range txInfo.Events { | ||
| if event.Type == types.EventTypeCreateContext { | ||
| for _, attribute := range event.Attributes { | ||
| if attribute.Key == types.EventTypeMsgIndex { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct attribute key constant
The attribute key should be types.AttributeKeyMsgIndex instead of types.EventTypeMsgIndex to accurately reference the message index attribute.
Apply this diff to fix the constant:
- if attribute.Key == types.EventTypeMsgIndex {
+ if attribute.Key == types.AttributeKeyMsgIndex {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if attribute.Key == types.EventTypeMsgIndex { | |
| if attribute.Key == types.AttributeKeyMsgIndex { |
| @@ -435,7 +430,7 @@ func TestAppSimulationAfterImport(t *testing.T) { | |||
| ) | |||
| require.Equal(t, "SimApp", newApp.Name()) | |||
|
|
|||
| newApp.InitChain(abci.RequestInitChain{ | |||
| newApp.InitChain(&abci.RequestInitChain{ | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle the error return value of newApp.InitChain
The return value of newApp.InitChain is not checked. It's important to handle potential errors to prevent unexpected behaviors.
Apply this diff to handle the error:
- newApp.InitChain(&abci.RequestInitChain{
+ err := newApp.InitChain(&abci.RequestInitChain{
AppStateBytes: exported.AppState,
})
+ require.NoError(t, err)Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)
433-433: Error return value of newApp.InitChain is not checked
(errcheck)
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
mathpackage.EndBlockEventstoFinalizeBlockEvents.Bug Fixes
Documentation
EventTypeMsgIndexto service module event types.Chores