-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 858
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Question] Multi-Object Adaptability Testing #206
Comments
Hey Willow, |
Hello @samibouziri At first I did that (creating num_envs number of objects and then putting all but one object in the robots workspace) but it was super slow! So now I have created a list of rigid objects, and each one is assigned to only one of the cloned environments. This method works better but is still 8-10x slower than using a single object for all envs... I have now moved onto restarting the sim with one repeated object (the standard method), training for x episodes, then shutting the sim down and restarting with a different object, as this has got to be more efficient than the previous two attempts. This method is so hacky though I hate it! Let me know if you have any better ideas... |
Thanks for the quick answer. I ended up to the same conclusion as you. Didn't find any better solution for the moment. |
Please check the updates on #186 . We have a working example shared there. I will close this issue to avoid duplicacy. |
Hello,
I am performing the manipulation lift task but with different objects in each scene (still just one object in each cloned environment). However, doing so is very slow (8x slower than just using the same object for each cloned env). Is there any intuition on whether this is a reasonable speed?
I am currently building num_envs rigid objects in a list and then randomization loops through the rigid object list resetting pose for each env. I am wondering if there is a better method or if someone has implemented something similar?
TLDR:
Is there a fast method of having different objects in each of the cloned envs?
Best,
Willow Mandil
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: