You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was surprised to find that the verbose flag (-v or --verbose) was not supported, whereas it is within rm.
While this functionality could be considered as a separate package surrounding rimraf, the files being deleted are not exposed, meaning it would have to include its own globbing logic, handing single files to rimraf to delete and thereby losing much of the benefit of using it in the first place.
I appreciate the desire to keep any sort of UI out of rimraf, but given that rm supports -v (lines of removed foo/bar/baz.txt) and that rimraf advertises itself as a substitute for rm -rf, I figured it was worth a conversation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I was surprised to find that the verbose flag (
-v
or--verbose
) was not supported, whereas it is withinrm
.While this functionality could be considered as a separate package surrounding
rimraf
, the files being deleted are not exposed, meaning it would have to include its own globbing logic, handing single files torimraf
to delete and thereby losing much of the benefit of using it in the first place.I appreciate the desire to keep any sort of UI out of
rimraf
, but given thatrm
supports-v
(lines ofremoved foo/bar/baz.txt
) and thatrimraf
advertises itself as a substitute forrm -rf
, I figured it was worth a conversation.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: