amendment of jsdoc section #21
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ishtms
approved these changes
Aug 28, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you, @TheRealOwenRees. It appears that I made a mistake in that particular section. I appreciate the correction there. Cheers 🎉
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Is this issue already raised? No
Chapter:
4
Section Title:
4.8 - jsdoc comments
The text below the code example
with_file_prefixrefers tomax_file_size. The current text explanation doesn't match the code block directly above it. I made some amendments to the text to reflect this.I hope this is correct, and I apologise for steaming ahead like this.