Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(j-s): Add defender to sendModifiedNotifications #14792

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 15, 2024
Merged

Conversation

oddsson
Copy link
Member

@oddsson oddsson commented May 14, 2024

Add defender to sendModifiedNotifications

Asana

What

Add defender (if one has been assigned to a case) to the list of people who get the modified email notification.

Why

This applies to them as well

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced notification system to send an email to the defender if their email address is available.

@oddsson oddsson requested a review from a team as a code owner May 14, 2024 12:51
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 14, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent update to the NotificationService class in the judicial system backend introduces a new feature that sends an email to the defender if their email address (theCase.defenderEmail) is available. This occurs before the service processes other recipients, ensuring that the defender is promptly notified.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/notification.service.ts Added a conditional block in the NotificationService class to send an email to the defender if theCase.defenderEmail is present before processing other recipients.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2ec575c and 7145d31.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/notification.service.ts (1 hunks)
Additional Context Used
Path-based Instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/notification.service.ts (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
Additional comments not posted (1)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/notification.service.ts (1)

1284-1293: Add defender to the list of recipients for modified notifications.

The addition of the defender to the list of recipients for the modified email notification is correct and follows the intended logic.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 14, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 36.97%. Comparing base (eec6b05) to head (ab27590).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #14792      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   36.92%   36.97%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files        6318     6314       -4     
  Lines      128708   128529     -179     
  Branches    36709    36653      -56     
==========================================
  Hits        47523    47523              
+ Misses      81185    81006     -179     
Flag Coverage Δ
api 3.48% <ø> (ø)
application-system-api 42.02% <ø> (ø)
application-template-api-modules 24.50% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
...c/app/modules/notification/notification.service.ts 78.96% <0.00%> (-0.20%) ⬇️

... and 14 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update eec6b05...ab27590. Read the comment docs.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

Datadog Report

All test runs ee39d13 🔗

6 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 6 Passed
⬆️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 1 increased (+0.01%), 8 no change

Test Services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
api 0 0 0 4 0 3.5s 1 no change Link
application-system-api 0 0 0 111 2 2m 59.11s 1 no change Link
application-template-api-modules 0 0 0 107 0 2m 41.53s 1 increased (+0.01%) Link
application-templates-driving-license 0 0 0 13 0 47.41s 1 no change Link
application-ui-shell 0 0 0 74 0 1m 20.98s 1 no change Link
judicial-system-backend 0 0 0 19487 0 17m 13.97s 1 no change Link

@oddsson oddsson added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label May 15, 2024
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 356b36c into main May 15, 2024
48 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the j-s/def-email branch May 15, 2024 12:44
jonnigs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2024
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
jonnigs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2024
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Ballioli pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2024
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 18, 2024
6 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants