fix(service-portal-health): small refactor #14939
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates focus on refining the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #14939 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 37.12% 37.02% -0.10%
==========================================
Files 6390 6385 -5
Lines 130064 129777 -287
Branches 37107 37024 -83
==========================================
- Hits 48282 48054 -228
+ Misses 81782 81723 -59
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 129 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 2 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 1 Passed Test Services
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
libs/api/domains/rights-portal/src/lib/overview/overview.resolver.ts (2)
Line range hint
36-36: Remove or correct the misplaced decorators.- @FeatureFlag(Features.servicePortalHealthRightsModule) - @FeatureFlag(Features.servicePortalHealthOverviewPage)Also applies to: 47-47
Line range hint
16-17: Imports used only as types should be imported usingimport type.- import { User } from '@island.is/auth-nest-tools' + import type { User } from '@island.is/auth-nest-tools'libs/api/domains/rights-portal/src/lib/overview/overview.service.ts (2)
Line range hint
16-16: Correct the usage of decorators if they are misplaced.- @Inject(LOGGER_PROVIDER)
Line range hint
1-2: Imports used only as types should be imported usingimport type.- import { Inject, Injectable } from '@nestjs/common' + import type { Inject } from '@nestjs/common' + import { Injectable } from '@nestjs/common' - import { Auth, AuthMiddleware, User } from '@island.is/auth-nest-tools' + import type { Auth, User } from '@island.is/auth-nest-tools' + import { AuthMiddleware } from '@island.is/auth-nest-tools'Also applies to: 2-3, 4-5, 5-6
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- libs/api/domains/rights-portal/src/lib/overview/models/insuranceOverview.model.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/api/domains/rights-portal/src/lib/overview/overview.resolver.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/api/domains/rights-portal/src/lib/overview/overview.service.ts (3 hunks)
- libs/service-portal/health/src/lib/messages.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- libs/service-portal/health/src/lib/messages.ts
Additional Context Used
Biome (8)
libs/api/domains/rights-portal/src/lib/overview/overview.resolver.ts (3)
36-36: Decorators are not valid here.
47-47: Decorators are not valid here.
16-17: All these imports are only used as types.
libs/api/domains/rights-portal/src/lib/overview/overview.service.ts (5)
16-16: Decorators are not valid here.
1-2: All these imports are only used as types.
2-3: Some named imports are only used as types.
4-5: All these imports are only used as types.
5-6: All these imports are only used as types.
Path-based Instructions (3)
libs/api/domains/rights-portal/src/lib/overview/models/insuranceOverview.model.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/api/domains/rights-portal/src/lib/overview/overview.resolver.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/api/domains/rights-portal/src/lib/overview/overview.service.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
Additional comments not posted (6)
libs/api/domains/rights-portal/src/lib/overview/models/insuranceOverview.model.ts (2)
13-13: Ensure thefromfield is always provided by adjusting the type.
15-16: Consider the implications of makingstatusnullable on the consumer side.Verification successful
The search results indicate numerous instances of the term
statusacross various files and contexts. However, it is crucial to narrow down the search to the specific usage of thestatusfield within theInsuranceOverviewmodel to ensure proper handling of null values.To achieve this, we need to refine our search to focus on the
InsuranceOverviewmodel and itsstatusfield specifically. This will help us verify if the nullablestatusfield is being handled correctly in the relevant parts of the codebase.
The previous search did not yield any results, which suggests that the
statusfield in theInsuranceOverviewmodel might not be directly referenced in the expected manner. To ensure thorough verification, we should broaden our search to include any references to theInsuranceOverviewmodel itself. This will help us identify any indirect usages of thestatusfield.
The search results indicate that the
InsuranceOverviewmodel is used in several files, specifically inoverview.service.ts,overview.resolver.ts, andHealthOverview.tsx. To ensure that the nullablestatusfield is handled correctly, we need to inspect these files for proper null checks and handling of thestatusfield.Let's generate scripts to extract the relevant code snippets from these files to verify the handling of the
statusfield.
The extracted code snippets show that the
InsuranceOverviewmodel is used in theoverview.service.ts,overview.resolver.ts, andHealthOverview.tsxfiles. However, the snippets do not provide enough detail to confirm whether the nullablestatusfield is handled correctly.To ensure thorough verification, we need to extract more detailed code around the usage of the
InsuranceOverviewmodel, specifically focusing on how thestatusfield is accessed and whether null checks are implemented.
The detailed code snippets provide a clearer picture of how the
InsuranceOverviewmodel and itsstatusfield are used. Here are the key observations:
overview.service.ts:
- The
getInsuranceOverviewmethod fetches data and checks ifdatais null.- The
statusfield is accessed usingdata.status?.code, indicating that null checks are in place.overview.resolver.ts:
- The
getInsuranceOverviewquery returns anInsuranceOverviewobject or null.- This ensures that the resolver can handle cases where the
InsuranceOverviewmight be null.HealthOverview.tsx:
- The
insuranceobject is accessed usingdata?.rightsPortalInsuranceOverview.- The
statusfield is not directly accessed here, but the use of optional chaining (?.) suggests that null checks are considered.Based on these observations, it appears that the nullable
statusfield in theInsuranceOverviewmodel is handled correctly in the relevant parts of the codebase.
overview.service.ts: Proper null checks are in place when accessing thestatusfield.overview.resolver.ts: The resolver can handle null values forInsuranceOverview.HealthOverview.tsx: Optional chaining is used, indicating consideration for null values.Therefore, the concern about making the
statusfield nullable and its implications on the consumer side seems to be addressed adequately.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `status` field in the `InsuranceOverview` model to ensure they handle null values. # Test: Search for the `status` field usage. Expect: Proper null checks where used. rg --type typescript $'status'Length of output: 64
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `status` field in the `InsuranceOverview` model to ensure they handle null values. # Test: Search for the `status` field usage. Expect: Proper null checks where used. rg --type ts 'status'Length of output: 408341
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `status` field in the `InsuranceOverview` model to ensure they handle null values. # Test: Search for the `InsuranceOverview` model and its `status` field usage. Expect: Proper null checks where used. rg --type ts 'InsuranceOverview.*status'Length of output: 42
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `InsuranceOverview` model to ensure they handle the nullable `status` field correctly. # Test: Search for the `InsuranceOverview` model usage. Expect: Proper handling of the `status` field where used. rg --type ts 'InsuranceOverview'Length of output: 1846
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract relevant code snippets from files using the `InsuranceOverview` model to verify handling of the nullable `status` field. # Extract code from overview.service.ts rg --type ts --context 5 'InsuranceOverview' libs/api/domains/rights-portal/src/lib/overview/overview.service.ts # Extract code from overview.resolver.ts rg --type ts --context 5 'InsuranceOverview' libs/api/domains/rights-portal/src/lib/overview/overview.resolver.ts # Extract code from HealthOverview.tsx rg --type ts --context 5 'rightsPortalInsuranceOverview' libs/service-portal/health/src/screens/HealthOverview/HealthOverview.tsxLength of output: 2572
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract detailed code snippets from files using the `InsuranceOverview` model to verify handling of the nullable `status` field. # Extract detailed code from overview.service.ts rg --type ts --context 10 'InsuranceOverview' libs/api/domains/rights-portal/src/lib/overview/overview.service.ts # Extract detailed code from overview.resolver.ts rg --type ts --context 10 'InsuranceOverview' libs/api/domains/rights-portal/src/lib/overview/overview.resolver.ts # Extract detailed code from HealthOverview.tsx rg --type ts --context 10 'rightsPortalInsuranceOverview' libs/service-portal/health/src/screens/HealthOverview/HealthOverview.tsxLength of output: 3714
libs/api/domains/rights-portal/src/lib/overview/overview.resolver.ts (1)
3-3: Ensure that theUseGuardsdecorator is correctly applied.libs/api/domains/rights-portal/src/lib/overview/overview.service.ts (3)
32-34: Log the missing data warning to help with debugging.
45-54: Ensure thegetInsuranceOverviewmethod handles cases where data is not available.
67-67: Ensure thefromfield is handled correctly when data is missing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
libs/api/domains/rights-portal/src/lib/overview/overview.service.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-2: Consider removing unused imports.- import { Injectable, Inject } from '@nestjs/common' + import { Injectable } from '@nestjs/common'
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- libs/api/domains/rights-portal/src/lib/overview/overview.service.ts (3 hunks)
- libs/service-portal/health/src/lib/messages.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- libs/service-portal/health/src/lib/messages.ts
Additional Context Used
Biome (5)
libs/api/domains/rights-portal/src/lib/overview/overview.service.ts (5)
16-16: Decorators are not valid here.
1-2: All these imports are only used as types.
2-3: Some named imports are only used as types.
4-5: All these imports are only used as types.
5-6: All these imports are only used as types.
Path-based Instructions (1)
libs/api/domains/rights-portal/src/lib/overview/overview.service.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
Additional comments not posted (2)
libs/api/domains/rights-portal/src/lib/overview/overview.service.ts (2)
32-34: Good use of logging to handle missing data scenarios.
Line range hint
45-67: The refactoring to always return anInsuranceOverviewobject, even when data is missing, makes the output more predictable and aligns with the PR objectives.
thorkellmani
added
the
deprecated:automerge
What
Why
Screenshots / Gifs
Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
Injectimport to streamline code.