feat(application): Student health insurance declaration length #15808
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a mock data JSON file for a health insurance declaration API, detailing structured health insurance information and HTTP routes. The Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #15808 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 36.96% 36.96%
=======================================
Files 6635 6635
Lines 136021 136021
Branches 38734 38734
=======================================
Hits 50280 50280
Misses 85741 85741
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (17)
libs/application/templates/health-insurance-declaration/mockData/health-insurance-declaration.json (17)
10-96: Route Section: Ensure Consistency and CompletenessThe first route section is well-structured, but ensure that all necessary fields are filled out, especially the documentation field which is currently empty. This can help with understanding the purpose of the route.
97-182: Route Section: Ensure Consistency and CompletenessThe second route section is well-structured, but ensure that all necessary fields are filled out, especially the documentation field which is currently empty. This can help with understanding the purpose of the route.
183-354: Route Section: Ensure Consistency and CompletenessThe third route section is well-structured, but ensure that all necessary fields are filled out, especially the documentation field which is currently empty. This can help with understanding the purpose of the route.
355-526: Route Section: Ensure Consistency and CompletenessThe fourth route section is well-structured, but ensure that all necessary fields are filled out, especially the documentation field which is currently empty. This can help with understanding the purpose of the route.
527-612: Route Section: Ensure Consistency and CompletenessThe fifth route section is well-structured, but ensure that all necessary fields are filled out, especially the documentation field which is currently empty. This can help with understanding the purpose of the route.
613-698: Route Section: Ensure Consistency and CompletenessThe sixth route section is well-structured, but ensure that all necessary fields are filled out, especially the documentation field which is currently empty. This can help with understanding the purpose of the route.
699-808: Route Section: Ensure Consistency and CompletenessThe seventh route section is well-structured, but ensure that all necessary fields are filled out, especially the documentation field which is currently empty. This can help with understanding the purpose of the route.
809-894: Route Section: Ensure Consistency and CompletenessThe eighth route section is well-structured, but ensure that all necessary fields are filled out, especially the documentation field which is currently empty. This can help with understanding the purpose of the route.
895-980: Route Section: Ensure Consistency and CompletenessThe ninth route section is well-structured, but ensure that all necessary fields are filled out, especially the documentation field which is currently empty. This can help with understanding the purpose of the route.
981-1066: Route Section: Ensure Consistency and CompletenessThe tenth route section is well-structured, but ensure that all necessary fields are filled out, especially the documentation field which is currently empty. This can help with understanding the purpose of the route.
1067-1152: Route Section: Ensure Consistency and CompletenessThe eleventh route section is well-structured, but ensure that all necessary fields are filled out, especially the documentation field which is currently empty. This can help with understanding the purpose of the route.
1153-1238: Route Section: Ensure Consistency and CompletenessThe twelfth route section is well-structured, but ensure that all necessary fields are filled out, especially the documentation field which is currently empty. This can help with understanding the purpose of the route.
1239-1348: Route Section: Ensure Consistency and CompletenessThe thirteenth route section is well-structured, but ensure that all necessary fields are filled out, especially the documentation field which is currently empty. This can help with understanding the purpose of the route.
1349-1444: Route Section: Ensure Consistency and CompletenessThe fourteenth route section is well-structured, but ensure that all necessary fields are filled out, especially the documentation field which is currently empty. This can help with understanding the purpose of the route.
1445-1544: Route Section: Ensure Consistency and CompletenessThe fifteenth route section is well-structured, but ensure that all necessary fields are filled out, especially the documentation field which is currently empty. This can help with understanding the purpose of the route.
1647-1657: Proxy Request Headers: Ensure CompletenessThe proxy request headers section is currently empty. Ensure that any necessary headers are added here.
1658-1661: Proxy Response Headers: Ensure CompletenessThe proxy response headers section is currently empty. Ensure that any necessary headers are added here.
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance-declaration/mockData/health-insurance-declaration.json (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance-declaration/src/forms/HealthInsuranceDeclarationForm.ts (3 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance-declaration/src/lib/messages/application.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (3)
libs/application/templates/health-insurance-declaration/src/lib/messages/application.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance-declaration/src/forms/HealthInsuranceDeclarationForm.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/health-insurance-declaration/mockData/health-insurance-declaration.json (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
Additional comments not posted (9)
libs/application/templates/health-insurance-declaration/src/lib/messages/application.ts (2)
177-181: LGTM!The new message entry
studentMinDateWarningTitleis correctly defined.The code changes are approved.
182-187: LGTM!The new message entry
studentMinDateWarningis correctly defined.The code changes are approved.
libs/application/templates/health-insurance-declaration/src/forms/HealthInsuranceDeclarationForm.ts (3)
49-49: LGTM!The import statement for
subfromdate-fnsis correctly added.The code changes are approved.
383-388: LGTM!The
minDatelogic is correctly implemented and improves the form's validation.The code changes are approved.
403-414: LGTM!The
buildAlertMessageFieldcomponent is correctly implemented and improves user experience by providing contextual feedback.The code changes are approved.
libs/application/templates/health-insurance-declaration/mockData/health-insurance-declaration.json (4)
1-9: Metadata Section: Looks GoodThe initial metadata section includes UUID, last migration, name, endpoint prefix, latency, port, hostname, and folders. Everything seems correctly structured.
1545-1615: Root Children Section: Looks GoodThe root children section includes references to all route UUIDs. Everything seems correctly structured.
1616-1627: Proxy and TLS Options: Looks GoodThe proxy and TLS options section is well-structured. Everything seems correctly set up.
1628-1646: CORS Headers: Looks GoodThe CORS headers section is well-structured. Everything seems correctly set up.
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 4 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 4 Passed Test Services
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance-declaration/mockData/health-insurance-declaration.json (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance-declaration/mockData/health-insurance-declaration.json
...plication/templates/health-insurance-declaration/src/forms/HealthInsuranceDeclarationForm.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
Since the mockoon captures are quite specific to each application I figured they would belong with the application templates they relate to rather than in a central location. Also this way we don't have to bother the core team every time we CRUD them. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance-declaration/src/forms/HealthInsuranceDeclarationForm.ts (3 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
libs/application/templates/health-insurance-declaration/src/forms/HealthInsuranceDeclarationForm.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
Additional comments not posted (1)
libs/application/templates/health-insurance-declaration/src/forms/HealthInsuranceDeclarationForm.ts (1)
49-49: LGTM!The import statement for
subfromdate-fnsis correct and necessary for the new date calculation logic.
...plication/templates/health-insurance-declaration/src/forms/HealthInsuranceDeclarationForm.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- libs/application/templates/health-insurance-declaration/src/forms/HealthInsuranceDeclarationForm.ts (3 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
libs/application/templates/health-insurance-declaration/src/forms/HealthInsuranceDeclarationForm.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
Additional comments not posted (2)
libs/application/templates/health-insurance-declaration/src/forms/HealthInsuranceDeclarationForm.ts (2)
49-49: LGTM!The import statement for
subfromdate-fnsis correct and necessary for the new date calculation logic.
382-386: LGTM! Consider simplifying the condition for the alert message field.The new minimum date calculation logic and the new alert message field enhance the form's validation and user experience. However, the condition for the alert message field can be simplified.
Apply this diff to simplify the condition for the alert message field:
-buildAlertMessageField({ - id: 'dateAlertMessage', - alertType: 'warning', - title: m.application.date.studentMinDateWarningTitle, - message: m.application.date.studentMinDateWarning, - condition: (answers) => { - return ( - answers.studentOrTouristRadioFieldTourist === - ApplicantType.STUDENT - ) - }, -}), +buildAlertMessageField({ + id: 'dateAlertMessage', + alertType: 'warning', + title: m.application.date.studentMinDateWarningTitle, + message: m.application.date.studentMinDateWarning, + condition: (answers) => + answers.studentOrTouristRadioFieldTourist === ApplicantType.STUDENT, +}),Also applies to: 401-409
norda-gunni
added
the
deprecated:automerge
* Add mock data for the application * Add minimum date and notification text for students * chore: nx format:write update dirty files * Add minimum date and notification text for students * Remove accidental import * Coderabbit --------- Co-authored-by: andes-it <builders@andes.is> Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
...
Attach a link to issue if relevant
Issue
Issue
What
Specify what you're trying to achieve
Why
Specify why you need to achieve this
Screenshots / Gifs
Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements