Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(j-s): Disable Next Button While Editing #15861

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 3, 2024

Conversation

gudjong
Copy link
Member

@gudjong gudjong commented Sep 3, 2024

Disable Next Button While Editing

Gagnaframlagning - Óvirkja "Senda gögn" takka fyrir viðbótargögn á meðan notandi er að breyta nafni eða dagsetningu á einhverju skjali

What

  • Disables forward navigation when editing files (names and dates).
  • Consolidates error handling during editing by moving it to EditableCaseFile.
  • Note that the user is forced to complete the editing with a valid file name and display date, empty values are no longer allowed. To cancel changes, the user can either use undo (cmd-z) or reload the page.
  • Optimizes updates during reordering of case files in case files records. No updates are performed if the order is not changed.

Why

  • Improved user experience.

Screenshots / Gifs

Additional Case Files

Screen.Recording.2024-09-03.at.09.01.29.mov
Screen.Recording.2024-09-03.at.10.19.42.mov

Case Files Record

Screen.Recording.2024-09-03.at.09.02.38.mov

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced new error messages for filename and date validation during document updates.
    • Added functionality to track the number of edits made to case files across various components.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling by removing outdated error messages and ensuring consistent user feedback.
  • Enhancements

    • Streamlined file renaming logic and input validation, enforcing stricter requirements for user inputs.
    • Enhanced component interactivity by integrating state management for edit tracking.

@gudjong gudjong requested a review from a team as a code owner September 3, 2024 09:04
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to error message handling, prop interfaces, and component logic across various files in the judicial system application. Key updates include the removal and renaming of error messages, the addition of new error messages for validation, and enhancements to the editing state management for case files. These adjustments aim to streamline user feedback and improve the functionality of components related to file management.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.../messages/Core/errors.ts Removed invalidDateErrorMessage and renameFailedErrorMessage.
.../AccordionItems/IndictmentsCaseFilesAccordionItem.strings.ts Renamed export from indictmentsCaseFilesAccordionItem to strings; changed removeFailedErrorMessage to renameFailedErrorMessage with updated message.
.../AccordionItems/IndictmentsCaseFilesAccordionItem.tsx Added setEditCount prop; streamlined renaming logic; updated import statements for string management; improved error handling.
.../EditableCaseFile/EditableCaseFile.strings.ts Added invalidFilenameErrorMessage and invalidDateErrorMessage for validation feedback.
.../EditableCaseFile/EditableCaseFile.tsx Modified onRename to require non-optional parameters; added onStartEditing and onStopEditing props; refined date parsing logic.
.../UploadFiles/UploadFiles.strings.ts Removed invalidDateErrorMessage and renameFailedErrorMessage.
.../UploadFiles/UploadFiles.tsx Updated onRename to require both newName and newDisplayDate; added setEditCount prop for tracking edits.
.../Prosecutor/Indictments/CaseFile/CaseFile.tsx Introduced editCount state variable to track edits; updated control flow based on editCount.
.../Shared/AddFiles/AddFiles.tsx Modified handleRename to require non-optional parameters; updated button enabling logic with editCount.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant EditableCaseFile
    participant UploadFiles
    participant AddFiles

    User->>EditableCaseFile: Start Editing
    EditableCaseFile->>EditableCaseFile: onStartEditing()
    EditableCaseFile->>User: Input Name and Date
    User->>EditableCaseFile: Submit
    EditableCaseFile->>UploadFiles: Rename File
    UploadFiles->>AddFiles: Handle Rename
    AddFiles->>User: Feedback on Rename
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/messages/Core/errors.ts (1)

Error Messages Still in Use:

The error messages invalidDateErrorMessage and renameFailedErrorMessage have been removed from errors.ts but are still being used in the codebase. This could lead to runtime errors. Please ensure these messages are either redefined or their usage is updated in the following locations:

  • invalidDateErrorMessage in apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/EditableCaseFile/EditableCaseFile.tsx
  • renameFailedErrorMessage in apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/AccordionItems/IndictmentsCaseFilesAccordionItem/IndictmentsCaseFilesAccordionItem.tsx
Analysis chain

Line range hint 1-80: Verify the impact of removing the error messages on the codebase.

Ensure that the removal of invalidDateErrorMessage and renameFailedErrorMessage does not introduce any issues or inconsistencies in the codebase.

Run the following script to verify the usage of the removed error messages:

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the removed error messages in the codebase.

# Test 1: Search for the usage of `invalidDateErrorMessage`. Expect: No occurrences.
rg --type typescript $'invalidDateErrorMessage'

# Test 2: Search for the usage of `renameFailedErrorMessage`. Expect: No occurrences.
rg --type typescript $'renameFailedErrorMessage'

Length of output: 164


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the removed error messages in the codebase.

# Test 1: Search for the usage of `invalidDateErrorMessage`. Expect: No occurrences.
rg 'invalidDateErrorMessage'

# Test 2: Search for the usage of `renameFailedErrorMessage`. Expect: No occurrences.
rg 'renameFailedErrorMessage'

Length of output: 674

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3cc8b76 and a9ed66a.

Files selected for processing (9)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/messages/Core/errors.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/AccordionItems/IndictmentsCaseFilesAccordionItem/IndictmentsCaseFilesAccordionItem.strings.ts (2 hunks)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/AccordionItems/IndictmentsCaseFilesAccordionItem/IndictmentsCaseFilesAccordionItem.tsx (17 hunks)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/EditableCaseFile/EditableCaseFile.strings.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/EditableCaseFile/EditableCaseFile.tsx (5 hunks)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/UploadFiles/UploadFiles.strings.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/UploadFiles/UploadFiles.tsx (3 hunks)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/CaseFile/CaseFile.tsx (4 hunks)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/AddFiles/AddFiles.tsx (5 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (9)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/UploadFiles/UploadFiles.strings.ts (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/EditableCaseFile/EditableCaseFile.strings.ts (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/UploadFiles/UploadFiles.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/AccordionItems/IndictmentsCaseFilesAccordionItem/IndictmentsCaseFilesAccordionItem.strings.ts (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/CaseFile/CaseFile.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/AddFiles/AddFiles.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/messages/Core/errors.ts (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/EditableCaseFile/EditableCaseFile.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/AccordionItems/IndictmentsCaseFilesAccordionItem/IndictmentsCaseFilesAccordionItem.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
Learnings (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/CaseFile/CaseFile.tsx (2)
Learnt from: unakb
PR: island-is/island.is#15378
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx:86-100
Timestamp: 2024-06-27T14:37:07.823Z
Learning: User unakb prefers explicit case handling in switch statements for key functionalities like `getRulingDecisionTagColor` to ensure clarity and avoid assumptions that a case was overlooked.
Learnt from: gudjong
PR: island-is/island.is#15421
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Processing/Processing.tsx:55-61
Timestamp: 2024-07-03T15:43:13.884Z
Learning: The `updateCase` method in the `apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Processing/Processing.tsx` file has its own error handling, and additional error handling in the `initialize` function is not necessary.
Additional comments not posted (30)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/UploadFiles/UploadFiles.strings.ts (1)

Line range hint 1-24: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The removal of the error message entries is a valid change based on the PR summary, which indicates a consolidation of error handling in the EditableCaseFile component.

The code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure and TypeScript usage for type safety.
  • Efficient state management techniques, as the component relies on the defineMessages function from react-intl for internationalization.
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/EditableCaseFile/EditableCaseFile.strings.ts (2)

10-15: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.


16-22: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/UploadFiles/UploadFiles.tsx (4)

18-18: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. Making the newName and newDisplayDate parameters required in the onRename function signature ensures that both values are always provided when renaming a file.


19-19: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The addition of the setEditCount property to the Props interface allows the component to manage the state of an edit count effectively.


74-74: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The onStartEditing callback function correctly increments the edit count when a child component starts editing.


75-75: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The onStopEditing callback function correctly decrements the edit count when a child component stops editing.

apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/AccordionItems/IndictmentsCaseFilesAccordionItem/IndictmentsCaseFilesAccordionItem.strings.ts (2)

76-79: LGTM!

The changes to the renameFailedErrorMessage definition are approved:

  • The message key has been appropriately renamed to reflect the functionality of renaming a document.
  • The default message has been updated to provide accurate user feedback when an error occurs during renaming a document.
  • The message key and default message are consistent with each other.

3-3: Verify the usage of the exported constant in the codebase.

The exported constant name has been changed from indictmentsCaseFilesAccordionItem to strings. This will affect how this entity is imported and utilized in other parts of the application.

Run the following script to verify the usage:

apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/CaseFile/CaseFile.tsx (3)

27-27: Efficient state management for tracking edits.

The introduction of the editCount state variable using the useState hook efficiently manages the state for tracking the number of edits made. Passing this state as a prop to the child component allows it to potentially adapt its behavior based on the edit count. This enhances the interactivity and functionality of the component.


104-104: Improved user experience by disabling next button during edits.

Setting the nextIsDisabled prop of the FormFooter component based on the editCount state enhances the user experience and data integrity. When editCount is greater than 0, indicating unsaved edits, the next button is disabled. This prevents users from accidentally navigating forward without saving or discarding their changes. It ensures a smoother editing flow and reduces the risk of data loss.


Line range hint 1-111: Adherence to NextJS best practices, efficient state management, and TypeScript usage.

The CaseFile component follows NextJS best practices in terms of file structure and component organization. It efficiently manages state using the useState hook, ensuring optimal performance and reactivity. The component also leverages TypeScript to enhance type safety, such as specifying the type of editCount as number. This adherence to best practices, efficient state management, and TypeScript usage contributes to the overall maintainability and robustness of the codebase.

apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/AddFiles/AddFiles.tsx (4)

33-33: LGTM!

The introduction of the editCount state variable is a good addition to track the number of ongoing edits. This state variable will be used to control the enabling of the next button in the UI.


120-120: LGTM!

Passing the setEditCount function as a prop to the UploadFiles component allows the child component to update the editCount state in the parent component. This is a common pattern in React for sharing state between components.


132-134: LGTM!

The inclusion of the editCount check in the nextIsDisabled condition ensures that the user cannot proceed to the next step if there are ongoing edits. This enhances the user experience by preventing the user from moving forward with incomplete actions.


68-81: Verify the impact of the changes on the caller of the handleRename function.

The changes to the handleRename function enforce stricter input validation by requiring the newName and newDisplayDate parameters. This ensures that a valid name and date are always provided when renaming a file.

However, the removal of the date parsing and validation logic suggests a shift towards relying on the caller to ensure that the date is valid before invoking the rename function. This simplifies the handleRename function but places the responsibility of date validation on the caller.

Please ensure that the caller of the handleRename function (e.g., the UploadFiles component) properly validates the date before invoking the function. You can use the following script to search for the usage of the handleRename function:

apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/EditableCaseFile/EditableCaseFile.tsx (8)

6-7: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.


16-16: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.


43-43: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.


46-47: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.


51-60: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.


71-71: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.


78-98: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.


267-270: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/AccordionItems/IndictmentsCaseFilesAccordionItem/IndictmentsCaseFilesAccordionItem.tsx (6)

58-58: LGTM!

The addition of the setEditCount prop in the Props interface is approved. It aligns with the PR objective of improving the editing state management for case files.


65-67: LGTM!

The changes to the CaseFileProps interface are approved:

  • The addition of the setEditCount prop aligns with the PR objective of improving the editing state management for case files.
  • The update to the onRename prop improves type safety and code clarity by ensuring that the name and displayDate parameters are always provided when renaming a case file.

118-124: LGTM!

The change to the getFilesToUpdate function is approved. Returning an empty array when the file is not in a chapter simplifies the logic, improves code readability, and avoids unnecessary updates.


192-193: LGTM!

The changes to the CaseFile component are approved. Invoking the setEditCount function when editing starts or stops aligns with the PR objective of enhancing the editing state management for case files.

Also applies to: 260-261


276-276: LGTM!

The changes to the IndictmentsCaseFilesAccordionItem component are approved:

  • Destructuring the setEditCount prop aligns with the PR objective of enhancing the editing state management for case files.
  • Returning early from the handleReorder function if there are no files to update improves code readability and performance by avoiding unnecessary mutation calls.
  • Directly updating the reorderableItems state in the handleRename function simplifies the code and improves readability by removing intermediate checks and date validation.
  • Using the new strings import for formatting error messages ensures consistency and maintainability by centralizing string management.

Also applies to: 372-374, 408-417, 436-436


Line range hint 1-518: Code adheres to NextJS best practices and TypeScript usage.

The code follows NextJS best practices, including:

  • Proper file structure and component organization.
  • Efficient state management using React hooks and TypeScript.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety.

No issues found.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Datadog Report

All test runs e2d69b3 🔗

9 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 9 Passed
🔻 Test Sessions change in coverage: 1 decreased (-0.05%), 1 increased (+0.02%), 10 no change

Test Services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
judicial-system-api 0 0 0 54 0 6.05s 1 no change Link
judicial-system-backend 0 0 0 20006 0 17m 11.49s 1 decreased (-0.05%) Link
judicial-system-formatters 0 0 0 36 0 5.19s 1 no change Link
judicial-system-message 0 0 0 31 0 11.1s 1 no change Link
judicial-system-message-handler 0 0 0 4 0 3.7s 1 no change Link
judicial-system-scheduler 0 0 0 4 0 3.85s 1 no change Link
judicial-system-types 0 0 0 23 0 6.93s 1 no change Link
judicial-system-web 0 0 0 338 0 1m 2.57s 1 increased (+0.02%) Link
judicial-system-xrd-api 0 0 0 6 0 4.66s 1 no change Link

🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (1)

  • judicial-system-backend - jest 59.68% (-0.05%) - Details

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 13.63636% with 38 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 36.93%. Comparing base (4f1a362) to head (c1dbec4).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...c/components/EditableCaseFile/EditableCaseFile.tsx 0.00% 16 Missing ⚠️
...ccordionItem/IndictmentsCaseFilesAccordionItem.tsx 25.00% 15 Missing ⚠️
...tem/web/src/components/UploadFiles/UploadFiles.tsx 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
...system/web/src/routes/Shared/AddFiles/AddFiles.tsx 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
...outes/Prosecutor/Indictments/CaseFile/CaseFile.tsx 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #15861   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   36.93%   36.93%           
=======================================
  Files        6681     6681           
  Lines      136449   136448    -1     
  Branches    38746    38744    -2     
=======================================
+ Hits        50395    50399    +4     
+ Misses      86054    86049    -5     
Flag Coverage Δ
judicial-system-api 18.26% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-backend 56.15% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-formatters 80.79% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-message 66.79% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-message-handler 47.61% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-scheduler 69.55% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-types 49.10% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-web 28.78% <13.63%> (+0.02%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
apps/judicial-system/web/messages/Core/errors.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...nItem/IndictmentsCaseFilesAccordionItem.strings.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...nents/EditableCaseFile/EditableCaseFile.strings.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
.../src/components/UploadFiles/UploadFiles.strings.ts 0.00% <ø> (ø)
...outes/Prosecutor/Indictments/CaseFile/CaseFile.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...tem/web/src/components/UploadFiles/UploadFiles.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...system/web/src/routes/Shared/AddFiles/AddFiles.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ccordionItem/IndictmentsCaseFilesAccordionItem.tsx 27.81% <25.00%> (+3.55%) ⬆️
...c/components/EditableCaseFile/EditableCaseFile.tsx 1.75% <0.00%> (-0.25%) ⬇️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4f1a362...c1dbec4. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a9ed66a and 9cdd99e.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/AccordionItems/IndictmentsCaseFilesAccordionItem/IndictmentsCaseFilesAccordionItem.spec.tsx (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/AccordionItems/IndictmentsCaseFilesAccordionItem/IndictmentsCaseFilesAccordionItem.spec.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
Additional comments not posted (5)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/AccordionItems/IndictmentsCaseFilesAccordionItem/IndictmentsCaseFilesAccordionItem.spec.tsx (5)

68-120: LGTM!

The test case is well-structured and follows best practices for unit testing. Defining the items array inline improves the clarity and specificity of the test case. The test case covers an important scenario for the getFilesToUpdate function.


129-185: LGTM!

The test case is well-structured and follows best practices for unit testing. Defining the items array inline improves the clarity and specificity of the test case. The updated test description enhances the readability and understanding of the test's purpose. The test case covers an important scenario for the getFilesToUpdate function.


187-239: LGTM!

The test case is well-structured and follows best practices for unit testing. Defining the items array inline improves the clarity and specificity of the test case. The test case covers an important scenario for the getFilesToUpdate function.


241-294: LGTM!

The test case is well-structured and follows best practices for unit testing. Defining the items array inline improves the clarity and specificity of the test case. The test case covers an important scenario for the getFilesToUpdate function.


Line range hint 1-400: Overall assessment: The changes enhance the test suite's organization and clarity.

The changes in this file involve restructuring the items array within individual test cases for the getFilesToUpdate and sortedFilesInChapter functions. Each test case is now self-contained and explicitly defines its context, improving the clarity and specificity of the tests.

The updated test descriptions better reflect the scenarios being tested, enhancing the readability and understanding of the test suite. The test cases cover important scenarios for the respective functions, ensuring thorough testing coverage.

Overall, the changes adhere to best practices for unit testing and improve the quality of the test suite. The modifications enhance the organization and clarity of the tests, making them more maintainable and easier to understand.

Copy link
Member

@oddsson oddsson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome!

@oddsson oddsson added the deprecated:automerge (Disabled) Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Sep 3, 2024
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 3c17135 into main Sep 3, 2024
36 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the j-s/disable-next-when-editing branch September 3, 2024 11:22
jonnigs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2024
* Disables next button while editing

* Updates unit tests

---------

Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 29, 2024
6 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 28, 2024
6 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
deprecated:automerge (Disabled) Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants