-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(regulations-admin): Minor fixes for affected #16143
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request consolidates utility functions for regulation amendment formatting and enhances the logic for displaying affected items. It introduces a new type definition Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- libs/portals/admin/regulations-admin/src/utils/formatAmendingRegulation.ts (7 hunks)
- libs/portals/admin/regulations-admin/src/utils/groupByArticleTitle.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (2)
libs/portals/admin/regulations-admin/src/utils/formatAmendingRegulation.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/portals/admin/regulations-admin/src/utils/groupByArticleTitle.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
Additional comments not posted (8)
libs/portals/admin/regulations-admin/src/utils/groupByArticleTitle.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-28
: Overall implementation looks goodThe function adheres to the coding guidelines for library files:
- It uses TypeScript for type definitions.
- It's exported for reuse across different NextJS apps.
- The implementation doesn't raise any concerns regarding tree-shaking or bundling practices.
9-12
: Approved with suggestions for improvementThe addition of the 'chapter__title' class check improves the function's flexibility. However, consider the following suggestions:
- Rename the function to better reflect its new behavior, e.g.,
groupElementsByArticleOrChapterTitleFromDiv
.- Add a comment explaining why chapter titles are now included in the grouping logic.
- Verify that this change doesn't negatively impact any components or hooks using this function, as it may now group more elements than before.
Here's a suggested refactor incorporating these improvements:
-export const groupElementsByArticleTitleFromDiv = ( +// Groups elements by article or chapter titles to support both regulation structures +export const groupElementsByArticleOrChapterTitleFromDiv = ( div: HTMLDivElement, ): HTMLElement[][] => { const result: HTMLElement[][] = [] let currentGroup: HTMLElement[] = [] Array.from(div.children).forEach((child) => { const element = child as HTMLElement if ( element.classList.contains('article__title') || element.classList.contains('chapter__title') ) { if (currentGroup.length > 0) { result.push(currentGroup) } currentGroup = [element] } else { currentGroup.push(element) } }) if (currentGroup.length > 0) { result.push(currentGroup) } return result }To ensure this change doesn't introduce unexpected behavior, run the following script to find all usages of this function:
Review the results to determine if any components need to be updated to handle potential changes in grouping behavior.
Verification successful
Change Verified and Approved
The function
groupElementsByArticleTitleFromDiv
is used exclusively informatAmendingRegulation.ts
, minimizing the impact of the proposed changes. Proceed with the following improvements:
- Rename the function to
groupElementsByArticleOrChapterTitleFromDiv
to accurately reflect its behavior.- Add a comment explaining the inclusion of chapter titles in the grouping logic.
- Update the usage in
formatAmendingRegulation.ts
accordingly.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all usages of the groupElementsByArticleTitleFromDiv function rg --type typescript "groupElementsByArticleTitleFromDiv"Length of output: 92
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all usages of the groupElementsByArticleTitleFromDiv function rg "groupElementsByArticleTitleFromDiv" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx"Length of output: 485
libs/portals/admin/regulations-admin/src/utils/formatAmendingRegulation.ts (6)
11-15
: Definition of 'AdditionObject' is appropriateThe introduction of the
AdditionObject
type enhances type safety and code clarity by formally defining the structure used in the context.
54-54
: Optional 'hideAffected' parameter added correctlyThe addition of the optional
hideAffected
parameter to the function signature is well-implemented and maintains backward compatibility.
139-142
: Conditional handling of 'joinedAffected' is appropriateSetting
joinedAffected
to an empty string whenhideAffected
is true ensures that affected items are correctly omitted from the output as intended.
205-209
: Improved title formatting in repeal logicThe update removes the prefix "reglugerð" and trims whitespace from
regTitle
, resulting in cleaner and more accurate titles in the generated HTML.
425-427
: Regex pattern for previous article title matches as intendedThe regular expression
/^\d+\. gr\.(?: [a-zA-Z])?(?= |$)/
correctly captures article numbers, optionally followed by a space and a letter, accommodating titles like "12. gr. a".
475-479
: Integration of 'allSameDay' function enhances logic flowUsing
allSameDay(additions)
to determine thehideAffected
flag streamlines the decision-making process based on the date consistency of the additions.
libs/portals/admin/regulations-admin/src/utils/formatAmendingRegulation.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16143 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 36.64% 36.66% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 6769 6760 -9
Lines 139446 138934 -512
Branches 39660 39473 -187
==========================================
- Hits 51100 50934 -166
+ Misses 88346 88000 -346
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 54 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 5 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 5 Passed Test Services
🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (1)
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Regex seems faulty
libs/portals/admin/regulations-admin/src/utils/formatAmendingRegulation.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/portals/admin/regulations-admin/src/utils/formatAmendingRegulation.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
libs/portals/admin/regulations-admin/src/utils/formatAmendingUtils.ts (4)
32-39
: LGTM: Well-implemented title extraction function with room for minor improvementThe
extractArticleTitleDisplay
function is well-implemented, uses TypeScript correctly, and is reusable. The use of Unicode property escape for matching letters is excellent for internationalization.A minor suggestion for improved clarity:
Consider adding a comment explaining the regular expression pattern, especially the Unicode property escape
\p{L}
, as it might not be immediately clear to all developers. For example:// Matches strings like '1. gr.' or '1. gr. a', where: // ^\d+\. gr\. matches the article number and 'gr.' prefix // (?: [\p{L}])? optionally matches a space followed by any Unicode letter (for sub-articles) // (?= |$) ensures the match is followed by a space or the end of the string const grMatch = title.match(/^\d+\. gr\.(?: [\p{L}])?(?= |$)/u)
64-69
: LGTM: Simple and effective prefix removal functionThe
removeRegPrefix
function is well-implemented, uses TypeScript correctly, and is reusable. Its simplicity makes it easy to understand and maintain.A minor suggestion for improved robustness:
Consider making the prefix check case-insensitive to handle potential variations in capitalization. You can modify the regular expression as follows:
export const removeRegPrefix = (title: string) => { return title.replace(/^Reglugerð\s*/i, ''); };This change will make the function more resilient to variations like "reglugerð" or "REGLUGERÐ", and it also removes any trailing whitespace after the prefix.
71-75
: LGTM: Effective regulation check function with room for improvementThe
isGildisTaka
function is well-implemented, uses TypeScript correctly, and is reusable. It effectively checks for phrases indicating a regulation taking effect.Suggestions for improved clarity and maintainability:
- Add a comment explaining the purpose of the function and the meaning of "GildisTaka".
- Consider breaking down the complex regular expression into named parts for better readability. For example:
/** * Checks if a string indicates a regulation taking effect (GildisTaka). * @param str The string to check * @returns True if the string indicates a regulation taking effect, false otherwise */ export const isGildisTaka = (str: string): boolean => { const takesEffect = /(öðlast|tekur).*gildi/; const setWithAuthority = /sett.*með.*(?:heimild|stoð)/; const pattern = new RegExp(`${takesEffect.source}|${setWithAuthority.source}`, 'i'); return pattern.test(str || ''); };This approach makes the function more self-documenting and easier to maintain or extend in the future.
82-89
: LGTM: Well-implemented date comparison function with room for minor improvementThe
allSameDay
function is well-implemented, uses TypeScript correctly, and is reusable. It effectively handles undefined dates and uses theisSameDay
function from 'date-fns' for consistent date comparison.A minor suggestion for improved clarity:
Consider adding a comment explaining the function's behavior when all dates are undefined. Also, you might want to use a more descriptive variable name instead of
validObjects
. For example:/** * Checks if all provided AdditionObjects have the same date. * @param objects Array of AdditionObjects to compare * @returns true if all objects have the same date or if all dates are undefined, false otherwise */ export const allSameDay = (objects: AdditionObject[]): boolean => { const objectsWithDates = objects.filter((obj) => obj.date !== undefined); if (objectsWithDates.length === 0) return true; // All dates are undefined const firstDate = objectsWithDates[0].date!; return objectsWithDates.every((obj) => isSameDay(obj.date!, firstDate)); };This change improves the function's self-documentation and makes its behavior more explicit.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- libs/portals/admin/regulations-admin/src/utils/formatAmendingRegulation.ts (7 hunks)
- libs/portals/admin/regulations-admin/src/utils/formatAmendingUtils.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/portals/admin/regulations-admin/src/utils/groupByArticleTitle.ts (0 hunks)
💤 Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (1)
- libs/portals/admin/regulations-admin/src/utils/groupByArticleTitle.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- libs/portals/admin/regulations-admin/src/utils/formatAmendingRegulation.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/portals/admin/regulations-admin/src/utils/formatAmendingUtils.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments not posted (3)
libs/portals/admin/regulations-admin/src/utils/formatAmendingUtils.ts (3)
4-30
: LGTM: Well-implemented grouping functionThe
groupElementsByArticleTitleFromDiv
function is well-implemented and adheres to the coding guidelines. It uses TypeScript for type definitions, is reusable across different NextJS apps, and follows efficient practices for DOM manipulation and array operations.
77-80
: LGTM: Clear and concise type definitionThe
AdditionObject
type is well-defined, uses TypeScript correctly, and is reusable across different NextJS apps. It clearly specifies the structure of objects representing additions to regulations.
1-89
: Overall assessment: Well-implemented utility functions adhering to guidelinesThis file provides a set of well-implemented utility functions for processing HTML elements related to regulations. The code adheres to the coding guidelines for files in the
libs
directory:
- Reusability: All functions and types are exported and can be easily used across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage: Props and types are consistently defined using TypeScript.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling: The functions are modular and don't have side effects, which should allow for effective tree-shaking.
The code is generally of high quality, with clear and concise implementations. Minor suggestions for improvements have been provided for some functions to enhance clarity, robustness, or performance.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM 🪨
* Minor affeced bugfixes * Update after cr comments * Update article names --------- Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
What
Minor fixes for affected
Why
Bugs need fixing
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes