Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(native-app): don't show progress bar for applications with type in progress #16158

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 27, 2024

Conversation

thoreyjona
Copy link
Contributor

@thoreyjona thoreyjona commented Sep 25, 2024

Snær found a bug for one of this applications. Turns out I was sometimes showing the progress bar for applications that had status: 'inprogress', it should only be showed for incomplete applications (i.e. with status: draft).

This fixes that bug and makes sure we only show the progress bar for incomplete applications.

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced progress tracking for applications by updating logic for displaying progress based on application type.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Resolved issues with progress values not displaying correctly for non-incomplete applications.

@thoreyjona thoreyjona requested a review from a team as a code owner September 25, 2024 15:27
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in the pull request modify the logic in the applications-preview.tsx file to adjust how the progress and progressTotalSteps properties are determined based on the type of application. The new implementation now assigns these properties only when the application type is 'incomplete', while setting them to undefined for all other types.

Changes

File Change Summary
apps/native/app/src/screens/applications/components/applications-preview.tsx Updated logic for progress and progressTotalSteps properties to assign values only for 'incomplete' applications; set to undefined otherwise.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

automerge

Suggested reviewers

  • snaerseljan

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@thoreyjona thoreyjona added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Sep 25, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/native/app/src/screens/applications/components/applications-preview.tsx (1)

71-78: Approved: Progress bar logic fixed as per PR objectives

The changes successfully address the bug mentioned in the PR objectives by ensuring that the progress bar is only shown for 'incomplete' applications. This implementation aligns with the NextJS and TypeScript best practices mentioned in the coding guidelines.

For improved readability, consider extracting the condition into a separate variable:

const isIncomplete = type === 'incomplete';
const progress = isIncomplete ? application.actionCard?.draftFinishedSteps ?? 0 : undefined;
const progressTotalSteps = isIncomplete ? application.actionCard?.draftTotalSteps ?? 0 : undefined;

This refactoring would make the logic more explicit and easier to maintain in the future.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3a2a05f and 8374b4b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/native/app/src/screens/applications/components/applications-preview.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/native/app/src/screens/applications/components/applications-preview.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 36.65%. Comparing base (9095b02) to head (57960d6).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #16158      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   36.70%   36.65%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files        6776     6772       -4     
  Lines      139609   139428     -181     
  Branches    39694    39626      -68     
==========================================
- Hits        51242    51111     -131     
+ Misses      88367    88317      -50     
Flag Coverage Δ
api 3.39% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-auth-admin 48.77% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-communications 39.96% <ø> (ø)
application-system-api 41.62% <ø> (ø)
application-template-api-modules 23.69% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
cms 0.43% <ø> (ø)
cms-translations 39.08% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-api 18.46% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-backend 54.82% <ø> (ø)
services-user-notification 47.13% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 34 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9095b02...57960d6. Read the comment docs.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Sep 25, 2024

Datadog Report

All test runs e37cb0c 🔗

10 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 9 Passed
➡️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 26 no change

Test Services
This report shows up to 10 services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
api 0 0 0 4 0 2.72s 1 no change Link
api-domains-auth-admin 0 0 0 18 0 12.37s 1 no change Link
api-domains-communications 0 0 0 5 0 29.01s 1 no change Link
api-domains-license-service 0 0 0 0 0 493.57ms 1 no change Link
application-system-api 0 0 0 111 2 3m 12.3s 1 no change Link
application-template-api-modules 0 0 0 109 0 1m 46.09s 1 no change Link
cms-translations 0 0 0 3 0 26.76s 1 no change Link
judicial-system-api 0 0 0 57 0 6.57s 1 no change Link
judicial-system-backend 0 0 0 21170 0 20m 27.79s 1 no change Link
services-user-notification 0 0 0 51 0 1m 24.51s 1 no change Link

Copy link
Contributor

@snaerseljan snaerseljan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice :)

@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit dc0e0fe into main Sep 27, 2024
60 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the fix/applications-progress-bar-fix branch September 27, 2024 15:09
thoreyjona added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2024
…n progress (#16158)

Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants