fix(id-card): email for parent B fix #16394
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes made in this pull request involve modifications to the data schema paths used to retrieve information in both the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Path-based instructions (1)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16394 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 36.73% 36.73%
=======================================
Files 6808 6808
Lines 141061 141058 -3
Branches 40217 40216 -1
=======================================
- Hits 51817 51816 -1
+ Misses 89244 89242 -2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/id-card/emailGenerators/assignParentBEmail.ts (1)
21-29: Summary: Data structure improvements with potential reusability considerationsThe changes in this file reflect an improvement in the organization of the data schema, making it more logically structured. Both modifications to accessing data from
application.answersare consistent with each other, separating information for the first and second guardians.While these changes enhance the code structure, they may impact the reusability of this component across different NextJS apps if the new data structure is not consistently applied throughout the application. It's crucial to ensure that all related components and functions are updated to use the new data paths.
To maintain the reusability of this component and adhere to best practices:
- Update all related components and functions to use the new data structure.
- Consider creating a shared interface or type definition for the application answers structure, which can be imported and used across different parts of the application.
- If this change is part of a larger refactoring effort, ensure that proper documentation is updated to reflect the new data structure.
These steps will help maintain consistency and improve the overall architecture of the application.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/id-card/emailGenerators/assignParentBEmail.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/id-card/emailGenerators/assignParentBEmail.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (1)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/id-card/emailGenerators/assignParentBEmail.ts (1)
21-21: LGTM! Verify data structure consistency.The updated path
'secondGuardianInformation.email'for accessing the other parent's email appears to be a more logically structured approach. This change reflects an improvement in the organization of the data schema.To ensure this change doesn't affect the reusability of the component across different NextJS apps, please verify the consistency of this data structure throughout the application. Run the following script to check for any inconsistencies:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for inconsistencies in the usage of 'secondGuardianInformation.email' # Search for occurrences of the old and new paths echo "Occurrences of old path 'applicantInformation.secondGuardianEmail':" rg --type typescript "applicantInformation\.secondGuardianEmail" echo "\nOccurrences of new path 'secondGuardianInformation.email':" rg --type typescript "secondGuardianInformation\.email" # Search for any remaining references to 'secondGuardianEmail' echo "\nAny remaining references to 'secondGuardianEmail':" rg --type typescript "secondGuardianEmail"This script will help identify any places where the old path might still be in use or where the new path structure isn't consistently applied.
...template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/id-card/emailGenerators/assignParentBEmail.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 4 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 4 Passed Test Services
|
...
Attach a link to issue if relevant
What
Specify what you're trying to achieve
Why
Specify why you need to achieve this
Screenshots / Gifs
Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes