Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(native-app): Remove old feature flags from app #16406

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 18, 2024

Conversation

thoreyjona
Copy link
Contributor

@thoreyjona thoreyjona commented Oct 15, 2024

Remove all old feature flags from app.
The ones that are currently used in the app now:

  • isPasskeyEnabled
  • isBarcodeEnabled
  • minimumSupportedAppVersion (not used as a feature flag though so it should not be deprecated)
  • isOrganDonationEnabled (recently added, not yet on main)

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced the WalletPassportScreen to always display children passport information if available.
    • Updated the WalletScreen to include all license types without feature flag checks.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Simplified logic in both screens by removing unnecessary feature flag conditions.

@thoreyjona thoreyjona requested a review from a team as a code owner October 15, 2024 13:17
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 15, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces significant changes to the WalletPassportScreen and WalletScreen components by removing feature flag checks that previously governed the rendering of certain elements. In WalletPassportScreen, the logic for displaying children passport information is simplified to rely solely on the presence of entries in the childrenPassport array. Similarly, in WalletScreen, feature flag checks for various license types are eliminated, allowing for unconditional inclusion of all relevant license types in the display logic.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
apps/native/app/src/screens/wallet-passport/wallet-passport.tsx Removed useFeatureFlag hook and simplified rendering logic for children passport section. Eliminated showChildrenPassport variable.
apps/native/app/src/screens/wallet/wallet.tsx Removed feature flag checks for license types; adjusted filtering logic to include all license types unconditionally. Modified data construction to include resPassport?.data?.getIdentityDocument directly.

Possibly related PRs

  • feat(native-app): React native update #15409: The changes in the WalletScreen component regarding the removal of feature flag checks for license types may relate to the overall simplification of logic in the application, similar to the changes made in the WalletPassportScreen component.
  • feat(application-system): Remove phone input feature flag  #16372: The removal of the disableDropdown property in favor of enableCountrySelector in various components indicates a shift in how phone input is handled, which aligns with the simplification of logic seen in the main PR's changes to the WalletPassportScreen and WalletScreen components.

Suggested labels

automerge

Suggested reviewers

  • snaerseljan
  • birkir

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 36.75%. Comparing base (4922c4f) to head (415803a).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #16406      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   36.75%   36.75%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        6835     6808      -27     
  Lines      141332   140916     -416     
  Branches    40240    40136     -104     
==========================================
- Hits        51949    51796     -153     
+ Misses      89383    89120     -263     
Flag Coverage Δ
api 3.37% <ø> (ø)
nest-aws ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 212 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4922c4f...415803a. Read the comment docs.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Oct 15, 2024

Datadog Report

Branch report: chore/remove-old-feature-flags
Commit report: 83c2726
Test service: api

✅ 0 Failed, 4 Passed, 0 Skipped, 2.77s Total Time
➡️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 1 no change

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
apps/native/app/src/screens/wallet/wallet.tsx (2)

141-141: LGTM: Simplified license filtering logic.

The removal of feature flag checks in the licenseItems useMemo hook aligns with the PR objective of removing old feature flags. This simplification improves code readability and maintainability.

Consider further simplifying the filter logic for improved readability:

const licenseItems = useMemo(() => {
  return (res.data?.genericLicenses ?? []).filter(
    ({ license }) => license.status !== 'Unknown'
  );
}, [res.data?.genericLicenses]);

This suggestion removes the unnecessary condition (!res.loading && !res.error) || res.data as the ?? operator already handles the case when res.data is undefined.


227-229: LGTM: Simplified data array construction.

The removal of conditional checks for including identity documents aligns with the PR objective of removing feature flags. This change simplifies the code and improves readability.

Consider adding a null check for improved null safety:

...(resPassport?.data?.getIdentityDocument ?? []),

This change ensures that even if resPassport.data is null or undefined, an empty array will be spread instead of potentially undefined values.

apps/native/app/src/screens/wallet-passport/wallet-passport.tsx (2)

215-215: Approve changes with a minor suggestion for improvement

The removal of the feature flag check simplifies the code and aligns with the PR objective. The children's passport section is now rendered based solely on the presence of entries in the childrenPassport array, which is a cleaner approach.

To further improve readability, consider using optional chaining and nullish coalescing operator:

- {childrenPassport?.length > 0 ? (
+ {childrenPassport?.length ? (

This change makes the condition slightly more concise while maintaining the same functionality.


Line range hint 1-438: Suggestion for future improvements

While the current changes are well-implemented and achieve the PR's objectives, there are opportunities for future improvements to modernize the component:

  1. Consider migrating from NavigationFunctionComponent to more modern React Navigation patterns if applicable.
  2. Evaluate the use of React hooks for state management and side effects throughout the component.
  3. Assess the potential for breaking down this large component into smaller, more focused components for better maintainability.

These suggestions are not critical for the current PR but could be considered for future refactoring efforts to keep the codebase up-to-date with the latest React and NextJS best practices.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a0d9ae7 and fb09683.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/native/app/src/screens/wallet-passport/wallet-passport.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/native/app/src/screens/wallet/wallet.tsx (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
apps/native/app/src/screens/wallet-passport/wallet-passport.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/native/app/src/screens/wallet/wallet.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🔇 Additional comments (2)
apps/native/app/src/screens/wallet/wallet.tsx (1)

110-114: LGTM: Simplified license type inclusion aligns with PR objectives.

The unconditional inclusion of all license types (DisabilityLicense, PCard, Ehic, and HuntingLicense) in the includedTypes array aligns well with the PR objective of removing old feature flags. This change simplifies the code and improves maintainability.

apps/native/app/src/screens/wallet-passport/wallet-passport.tsx (1)

Line range hint 1-438: Overall impact assessment: Positive changes aligned with best practices

The changes made to the WalletPassportScreen component are well-executed and align with React and NextJS best practices:

  1. Simplification: Removing the feature flag reduces conditional rendering complexity, making the code more maintainable.
  2. Localized changes: The modifications are focused on the children's passport section, minimizing the risk of unintended side effects.
  3. Type safety: The component's TypeScript types and props remain unchanged, maintaining strong type checking.
  4. Consistency: The overall structure and functionality of the component are preserved, ensuring a consistent user experience.

These changes effectively fulfill the PR objective of removing old feature flags while maintaining the component's integrity and improving its maintainability.

Copy link
Contributor

@snaerseljan snaerseljan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! well done

@thoreyjona thoreyjona added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Oct 18, 2024
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit c9ad948 into main Oct 18, 2024
33 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the chore/remove-old-feature-flags branch October 18, 2024 12:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants