-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(regulations-admin): affected date selection, remove propose from reg user topbar #16440
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
libs/portals/admin/regulations-admin/src/components/SaveDeleteButtons.tsx (1)
Line range hint
45-58
: Consider removing commented-out code and updating component interfaceThe removal of the 'propose' button aligns with the PR objective. However, there are a few points to consider:
- Instead of commenting out the code, it's generally better to remove it entirely. If needed, the code can be retrieved from version control history.
- The
propose
prop is still part of the component's interface (SaveDeleteButtonsProps
) but is no longer used. Consider removing it to keep the interface clean and up-to-date.- Check for any unused imports that may have been related to the 'propose' functionality and remove them if found.
These changes will improve code cleanliness and maintainability while still adhering to the coding guidelines for reusability and effective tree-shaking.
Here's a suggested refactor:
- Remove the commented-out code entirely.
- Update the
SaveDeleteButtonsProps
type to remove thepropose
property.- Remove any unused imports related to the 'propose' functionality.
Would you like me to provide a code snippet for these changes?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- libs/portals/admin/regulations-admin/src/components/EditMeta.tsx (1 hunks)
- libs/portals/admin/regulations-admin/src/components/SaveDeleteButtons.tsx (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
libs/portals/admin/regulations-admin/src/components/EditMeta.tsx (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/portals/admin/regulations-admin/src/components/SaveDeleteButtons.tsx (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (1)
libs/portals/admin/regulations-admin/src/components/EditMeta.tsx (1)
122-122
: Verify the implications of unrestricted date selectionThe change aligns with the PR objective of allowing unrestricted date selection for the effective date. However, consider the following points:
- Removing the
minDate
restriction and thegetNextWorkday
function allows for more flexible date selection, which is the intended behavior.- This flexibility might lead to users selecting unusual or potentially problematic dates.
To ensure this change doesn't introduce unexpected behavior, please verify:
- The warning mechanism mentioned in the PR objectives is implemented correctly.
- There are no other parts of the application that rely on the effective date being a workday or after a certain date.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16440 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 36.78% 36.64% -0.14%
==========================================
Files 6858 6814 -44
Lines 142408 141072 -1336
Branches 40618 40222 -396
==========================================
- Hits 52378 51691 -687
+ Misses 90030 89381 -649
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 394 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 2 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 2 Passed Test Services
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
What
Change affected date selection, remove propose from reg user topbar
Why
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes