fix(health-insurance): Fixing zod schema #16778
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve an update to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (1)
16-16: LGTM! Type-safe array implementation.The change from single file to array of files is implemented correctly using Zod's type-safe array validation.
Consider adding min/max constraints to the array to prevent potential abuse:
- confirmationOfResidencyDocument: z.array(FileSchema).optional(), + confirmationOfResidencyDocument: z.array(FileSchema).min(1).max(5).optional(),
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/lib/dataSchema.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (1)
Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (1)
libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (1)
16-16: Verify the impact of this breaking change.
The schema change from single file to array of files is a breaking change that might affect existing implementations.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the historical changes and usage patterns.
Breaking change confirmed but already properly handled
The git history shows this was changed from FileSchema.optional() to z.array(FileSchema).optional(). However, the codebase appears to have been properly updated to handle this change:
- The interface
FormerInsuranceintypes.tsalready expectsFileType[](array) - The form field definition in
formerInsuranceSection.tsis properly configured - The review component in
FormerInsurance.tsxis using the correct field ID
Since all related code has been updated to handle the array type, this change is not breaking existing implementations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for usages of confirmationOfResidencyDocument to identify affected code
# Search for direct property access
rg -A 3 "confirmationOfResidencyDocument"
# Search for form submissions or API calls related to health insurance
rg -A 5 "formerInsurance.*submit|health-insurance.*api"
Length of output: 3402
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check git history for this field
git log -p libs/application/templates/health-insurance/src/lib/dataSchema.ts | grep -A 5 -B 5 "confirmationOfResidencyDocument"
# Check for any API type definitions or interfaces
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
$$$
confirmationOfResidencyDocument
$$$
}'
# Check for form submission handlers
rg -A 10 "onSubmit.*formerInsurance|handleSubmit.*formerInsurance"
Length of output: 1971
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 99 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 96 Passed Test ServicesThis report shows up to 10 services
🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (1)
|
HjorturJ
added
the
deprecated:automerge
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
...
Attach a link to issue if relevant
What
Specify what you're trying to achieve
Why
Specify why you need to achieve this
Screenshots / Gifs
Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit