fix(efs): Efs db tweaks 21.11 #16977
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several modifications across multiple files related to the inheritance report feature. Key changes include updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16977 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 35.61% 35.76% +0.14%
==========================================
Files 6915 6910 -5
Lines 146014 145697 -317
Branches 41456 41414 -42
==========================================
+ Hits 52010 52105 +95
+ Misses 94004 93592 -412
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 21 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/fields/PrintScreen/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
4-24: Add TypeScript types to improve code quality.The component could benefit from proper TypeScript typing:
- Add explicit type for the event parameter
- Define component type
Apply this diff to improve type safety:
-export const PrintScreen = () => { +import { MouseEvent } from 'react' + +export const PrintScreen: React.FC = () => { return ( <Box position="absolute" className={styles.printButton} display={['none', 'none', 'block']} > <Button colorScheme="default" icon="print" iconType="filled" - onClick={(e) => { + onClick={(e: MouseEvent<HTMLButtonElement>) => { e.preventDefault() window.print() }} preTextIconType="filled" variant="ghost" ></Button> </Box> ) }libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/fields/Overview/OverviewDebts/index.tsx (1)
126-129: Consider using localization for the title format.The parentheses format should be localized to support different display patterns across languages.
+ // Add to messages + const titleFormat = formatMessage( + m.debtTitleFormat, + { description: description ?? '', type: debtType ?? '' } + ) title={titleFormat}libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/types.ts (1)
Breaking changes detected in RelationEnum with inconsistent usage
The verification reveals critical issues:
- Two different versions of
RelationEnumexist in the codebaseprepaidInheritance/applicant.tsattempts to use both old (ADVOCATE) and new enum values (REPRESENTATIVE,HEIR,GRANTOR)applicant.tsuses the new values includingEXCHANGEMANAGER- The enum appears to be redefined in the same file (
types.ts)Action items:
- Remove the duplicate enum definition
- Update
prepaidInheritance/applicant.tsto use only the new enum values- Ensure all enum values are properly documented as suggested
- Consider adding a migration guide for this breaking change
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
249-254: Address TODO comment and verify enum usageThe TODO comment questions whether the value labels make sense. Additionally, this is a breaking change that completely redefines the
RelationEnum.Let's verify the impact:
Please:
- Remove the TODO comment after confirming the labels
- Document the enum values
- Ensure all usages are updated to use the new values
-// todo: do these value labels make sense? export enum RelationEnum { + /** Representative of the estate */ REPRESENTATIVE = 'representative', + /** Heir to the estate */ HEIR = 'heir', + /** Manager handling the exchange */ EXCHANGEMANAGER = 'exchangeManager', + /** Person granting rights */ GRANTOR = 'grantor', }🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of RelationEnum values across the codebase # Find all files using the old enum values echo "Files potentially using old RelationEnum values:" rg -l "RelationEnum\.(PARENT|CHILD|SIBLING|SPOUSE|ADVOCATE)" # Find all files using the new enum values echo "Files using new RelationEnum values:" rg -l "RelationEnum\.(REPRESENTATIVE|HEIR|EXCHANGEMANAGER|GRANTOR)"Length of output: 594
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the actual usage context in these files echo "Content of files using old enum values:" rg -A 5 -B 5 "RelationEnum\.(PARENT|CHILD|SIBLING|SPOUSE|ADVOCATE)" libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/prepaidInheritance/applicant.ts echo -e "\nContent of files using new enum values:" rg -A 5 -B 5 "RelationEnum\.(REPRESENTATIVE|HEIR|EXCHANGEMANAGER|GRANTOR)" libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/prepaidInheritance/applicant.ts libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/applicant.ts # Let's also check for the enum definition echo -e "\nEnum definition:" rg -A 10 "export enum RelationEnum" libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/types.tsLength of output: 4724
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/fields/Overview/OverviewDebts/index.tsx(1 hunks)libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/fields/PrintScreen/index.tsx(1 hunks)libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/assets.ts(1 hunks)libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/debtsAndFuneralCost.ts(2 hunks)libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/types.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/assets.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (4)
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/fields/Overview/OverviewDebts/index.tsx (1)
Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/fields/PrintScreen/index.tsx (1)
Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/debtsAndFuneralCost.ts (1)
Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/types.ts (1)
Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (6)
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/fields/PrintScreen/index.tsx (1)
15-18: LGTM! Event handler implementation looks good.
The addition of preventDefault() is a good practice to ensure the button click doesn't trigger any unexpected form submissions or page refreshes.
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/fields/Overview/OverviewDebts/index.tsx (1)
126-129: LGTM: Compliant with library coding guidelines.
The code follows the required guidelines for library components:
- Uses TypeScript for type safety
- Component is reusable across NextJS apps
- Imports are specific, enabling effective tree-shaking
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/debtsAndFuneralCost.ts (2)
73-88: Verify the impact of debt type reordering on existing data
The significant reordering of debt types (e.g., moving PublicCharges to the top, changing positions of Loan and CreditCard) might affect existing records. Please ensure that:
- Data migration scripts handle the reordering correctly
- UI components displaying these values are updated accordingly
- Any downstream processing of these values is adjusted
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the results to understand the impact of debt type reordering:
-
The
DebtTypesenum is used in several key places:- Form configuration (debtsAndFuneralCost.ts)
- Syslumenn client mapping (syslumennClient.utils.ts)
- Fake data generation (fakeData.ts)
- Data schema validation (dataSchema.ts)
-
The mapping in syslumennClient.utils.ts shows a fixed mapping between
TegundAndlagsnumbers andDebtTypes, which suggests the order in the form doesn't affect the underlying data storage. -
The data schema (dataSchema.ts) validates
debtTypeas a string, not based on enum order.
Let me verify the enum definition to confirm if there are any numeric values that could be affected by reordering:
Reordering of debt types in the form is safe
The reordering of debt types in the form is safe because:
- The
DebtTypesenum uses string values, not numeric indices - Data storage and validation are based on these string values, not the order
- The mapping in syslumennClient.utils.ts uses fixed string values
- The form only changes the display order, not the underlying enum values
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other usages of DebtTypes enum to ensure consistent updates
ast-grep --pattern 'DebtTypes.$_'
# Search for any data migration scripts related to debt types
rg -g '*.ts' -g '*.sql' -i 'debttype|debt.*migration'
Length of output: 6726
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find the DebtTypes enum definition
ast-grep --pattern 'enum DebtTypes {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 1346
198-203: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance type safety and reusability of the PrintScreen component
While the PrintScreen component addition follows the pattern used in other sections, consider these improvements:
- Define TypeScript interfaces for the component props
- Export the interface for reuse across different NextJS apps
- Document any required parent context or dependencies
Consider adding a type definition file:
// PrintScreenProps.ts
export interface PrintScreenProps {
// Add relevant props based on component requirements
id: string;
title?: string;
// ... other props
}libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/types.ts (2)
305-307: LGTM: Debt type labels updated correctly
The changes to the DebtTypes enum look good:
- Updated
PropertyFeeslabel to be more precise - Added
PublicChargesfor better categorization
Line range hint 1-313: Excellent TypeScript usage and exports
The file follows TypeScript best practices:
- Clear interface definitions with proper typing
- Consistent enum usage
- Well-structured exports
- Reusable types that can be shared across NextJS apps
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/fields/Overview/OverviewDebts/index.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 5 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 5 Passed Test Services
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/heirs.ts (1)
93-108: Consider extracting the condition function for reusabilityThe alert message implementation is well-structured and type-safe. However, to improve maintainability and reusability, consider extracting the condition function.
+const isDeceasedMarried = (answers: Record<string, unknown>): boolean => + getValueViaPath<string>(answers, 'customShare.deceasedWasMarried') === YES + buildAlertMessageField({ id: 'reminderToFillInSpouse', title: '', message: m.heirsReminderToFillInSpouse, alertType: 'info', marginBottom: 'containerGutter', - condition: (answers) => { - return ( - getValueViaPath<string>( - answers, - 'customShare.deceasedWasMarried', - ) === YES - ) - }, + condition: isDeceasedMarried, }),libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/lib/messages.ts (1)
1374-1378: Add a description to help translators understand the context.The message structure is correct and follows the established patterns. However, consider adding a meaningful description to help translators understand when and where this reminder message is displayed.
heirsReminderToFillInSpouse: { id: 'ir.application:heirsReminderToFillInSpouse', defaultMessage: 'Athugið að passa þarf að skrá inn upplýsingar um maka.', - description: '', + description: 'Reminder message shown when spouse information needs to be filled in the heirs section', },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/heirs.ts(2 hunks)libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/lib/messages.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/heirs.ts (1)
Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/lib/messages.ts (1)
Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (2)
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/heirs.ts (2)
2-2: LGTM: Import added correctly
The buildAlertMessageField import is properly added from the core package, maintaining alphabetical order and following the reusability guidelines.
Line range hint 1-400: LGTM: Well-structured form configuration
The form configuration demonstrates:
- Strong TypeScript usage for type safety
- Proper component reusability through core builders
- Clear hierarchical structure
- Consistent naming conventions
albinagu
added
automerge
* fix(efs): Efs db tweaks 21.11 * reminder to fill in spouse * chore: nx format:write update dirty files * spouse reminder tweak --------- Co-authored-by: andes-it <builders@andes.is> Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
OverviewDebtscomponent to display debt descriptions in the formatdescription (debtType).PrintScreencomponent for asset and debt overviews.debtsAndFuneralCostsection with updated labels for various debt types.Bug Fixes
Documentation