Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(web): WHODAS calculator - Show 5 answers #16992

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 22, 2024
Merged

Conversation

RunarVestmann
Copy link
Member

@RunarVestmann RunarVestmann commented Nov 22, 2024

WHODAS calculator - Show 5 answers

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Increased the number of answer options available in the WHODASForm component by one, enhancing user choice in the selection process.

@RunarVestmann RunarVestmann added the deprecated:automerge (Disabled) Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Nov 22, 2024
@RunarVestmann RunarVestmann requested review from a team as code owners November 22, 2024 09:37
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 22, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request modify the WHODASForm component within the Calculator.tsx file. The condition for rendering answer options in the radio button selection has been updated from checking if answerIndex is greater than 3 to greater than 4. This alteration allows an additional answer option to be displayed in the user interface.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
apps/web/components/connected/WHODAS/Calculator.tsx Modified condition in WHODASForm to display an additional answer option by changing answerIndex check from 3 to 4.

Possibly related PRs

  • feat(web): WHODAS calculator #16947: This PR introduces the WHODASForm component in the same Calculator.tsx file, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR regarding the rendering of answer options.

Suggested reviewers

  • mannipje

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/web/components/connected/WHODAS/Calculator.tsx (1)

81-83: Consider using a constant for the maximum answer index.

To improve maintainability and reduce magic numbers, consider extracting the maximum answer index to a named constant.

+const MAX_ANSWER_OPTIONS = 4;
+
 const WHODASForm = ({ step, stepIndex, state, setState }: WHODASFormProps) => {
   // ...
-  if (answerIndex > 4) {
+  if (answerIndex > MAX_ANSWER_OPTIONS) {
     return null
   }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 421f147 and c2fdad0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/web/components/connected/WHODAS/Calculator.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/web/components/connected/WHODAS/Calculator.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/web/components/connected/WHODAS/Calculator.tsx (1)

81-81: Verify WHODAS 2.0 compatibility and data structure.

The change to show 5 answer options (0-4) aligns with the standard WHODAS 2.0 assessment scale. However, we should verify that the underlying data structure supports this change.

✅ Verification successful

Let me generate one more verification to check the answer options structure more thoroughly:


✅ Change to 5 answer options is properly supported

The verification confirms that:

  • The Question interface properly supports an array of answer options with scores
  • All 5 translation labels (0-4) are properly defined in Calculator.strings.ts
  • The data structure is compatible with the WHODAS 2.0 five-point scale
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the answer options data structure supports 5 options
# and that the translations exist for all 5 options

# Check for answer options structure in connected components
ast-grep --pattern 'answerOptions: {
  $$$
  score: $_
  $$$
}[]'

# Check for translation keys
rg -A 5 "answerLabel.*[0-4]"

Length of output: 2417


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for the Question interface or type definition
ast-grep --pattern 'interface Question {
  $$$
}'

# Check for actual answer options initialization
rg -A 10 "answerOptions.*=.*\["

Length of output: 500

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 22, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 35.62%. Comparing base (bd78723) to head (ddbd997).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...pps/web/components/connected/WHODAS/Calculator.tsx 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #16992   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   35.62%   35.62%           
=======================================
  Files        6914     6914           
  Lines      146001   146001           
  Branches    41451    41451           
=======================================
  Hits        52011    52011           
  Misses      93990    93990           
Flag Coverage Δ
api 3.34% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-health-insurance 34.43% <ø> (ø)
application-system-api 38.71% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
application-template-api-modules 27.72% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-car-recycling 3.12% <ø> (ø)
application-ui-shell 20.57% <ø> (ø)
clients-license-client 1.26% <ø> (ø)
license-api 42.59% <ø> (+0.07%) ⬆️
web 1.75% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...pps/web/components/connected/WHODAS/Calculator.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update bd78723...ddbd997. Read the comment docs.

---- 🚨 Try these New Features:

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Nov 22, 2024

Datadog Report

All test runs f42757a 🔗

9 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 7 Passed
➡️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 43 no change

Test Services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
api 0 0 0 4 0 2.33s 1 no change Link
api-domains-health-insurance 0 0 0 4 0 12.32s 1 no change Link
api-domains-license-service 0 0 0 0 0 478.37ms 1 no change Link
application-system-api 0 0 0 34 0 2m 29.71s 1 no change Link
application-template-api-modules 0 0 0 116 0 2m 8.43s 1 no change Link
application-ui-shell 0 0 0 74 0 32.12s 1 no change Link
download-service 0 0 0 0 0 477.37ms 1 no change Link
license-api 0 0 0 80 0 21.31s 1 no change Link
web 0 0 0 84 0 25.24s 1 no change Link

@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 6cf5d56 into main Nov 22, 2024
63 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the feature/web-whodas-answers branch November 22, 2024 10:13
jonnigs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2024
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
deprecated:automerge (Disabled) Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants