Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(web): Level 2 navigation for parent subpages should be visible despite theme #17100

Conversation

RunarVestmann
Copy link
Member

@RunarVestmann RunarVestmann commented Dec 2, 2024

Level 2 navigation for parent subpages should be visible despite theme

What

Follow up PR after #17096

The previous PR didn't handle "level 2" navigation, here we are adding the same logic for those pages.

It no longer matters if the theme is set to standalone or not

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Enhanced error handling for the StandaloneParentSubpage to improve robustness and ensure proper error propagation.

These changes aim to provide a smoother user experience by addressing potential issues that may arise during page property retrieval.

@RunarVestmann RunarVestmann requested review from a team as code owners December 2, 2024 13:14
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on enhancing the error handling logic within the getProps method of the Component in the index.tsx file. A try-catch block has been introduced to manage potential errors when retrieving properties for the StandaloneParentSubpage, replacing a previous conditional check. This modification allows for better error propagation while maintaining the existing logic for determining page types based on the slugs array and locale.

Changes

File Change Summary
apps/web/pages/s/[...slugs]/index.tsx Modified error handling in getProps method: replaced conditional check with try-catch block for improved error management.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

automerge

Suggested reviewers

  • mannipje

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@RunarVestmann RunarVestmann added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Dec 2, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/web/pages/s/[...slugs]/index.tsx (1)

323-333: Consider refactoring duplicated error handling logic

The error handling logic for StandaloneParentSubpage.getProps is duplicated between the 2-segment and 3-segment URL cases. Consider extracting this into a helper function to improve maintainability.

+ async function tryStandaloneParentSubpage(context) {
+   try {
+     return {
+       page: {
+         type: PageType.STANDALONE_PARENT_SUBPAGE,
+         props: await StandaloneParentSubpage.getProps(context),
+       },
+     }
+   } catch (error) {
+     if (!(error instanceof CustomNextError)) {
+       throw error
+     }
+     return null
+   }
+ }

Then use it in both places:

const standaloneResult = await tryStandaloneParentSubpage(modifiedContext)
if (standaloneResult) return standaloneResult
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4137b1f and d20c1a9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/web/pages/s/[...slugs]/index.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/web/pages/s/[...slugs]/index.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/web/pages/s/[...slugs]/index.tsx (1)

323-333: Verify error handling behavior

The current implementation silently swallows CustomNextError exceptions and falls back to other page types. Please verify that this behavior is intentional and doesn't mask legitimate 404 errors or other important error states.

✅ Verification successful

Let me generate additional scripts to understand the full context of error handling in this file.


Let me generate one more script to check the error handling in the getServerSidePropsWrapper utility since it's responsible for handling errors at the top level.


Based on the comprehensive analysis of the codebase, I can now provide a final response about the error handling behavior:

The error handling behavior is intentional and properly implemented

The current implementation of swallowing CustomNextError exceptions is part of a deliberate fallback strategy where:

  1. If a CustomNextError with 404 status is caught, it's handled by the top-level getServerSidePropsWrapper which:

    • Logs the error
    • Attempts to find a redirect URL
    • Falls back to Next.js's native notFound handling if no redirect is found
  2. The try-catch block in the page routing logic allows for graceful degradation through different page types, only proceeding if a specific page type is not found, which is a valid routing pattern.

  3. All other error types (non-CustomNextError) are properly re-thrown, ensuring that actual system errors are not masked.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other instances of CustomNextError handling to understand the standard error handling pattern

# Search for CustomNextError usage patterns
echo "Searching for CustomNextError handling patterns..."
rg -A 2 "CustomNextError" --type ts

# Search for similar error handling patterns
echo "Searching for similar try-catch patterns..."
ast-grep --pattern 'try {
  $$$
} catch (error) {
  if (!(error instanceof $_)) {
    $$$
  }
}'

Length of output: 38478


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the full content of the file to understand the error handling flow
echo "Checking the complete file content..."
cat "apps/web/pages/s/[...slugs]/index.tsx"

# Check for any error handling utilities or middleware
echo -e "\nChecking for error handling utilities..."
rg -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" "getServerSidePropsWrapper" -A 5

Length of output: 84273


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the error handling implementation in getServerSidePropsWrapper
cat "apps/web/utils/getServerSidePropsWrapper.ts"

# Check for any 404 handling utilities
echo -e "\nChecking for 404 handling utilities..."
rg "404" "apps/web/utils/fetch404RedirectUrl.ts"

Length of output: 2567

apps/web/pages/s/[...slugs]/index.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 35.68%. Comparing base (1eef914) to head (25c6e51).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
apps/web/pages/s/[...slugs]/index.tsx 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #17100      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   35.68%   35.68%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        6946     6946              
  Lines      147391   147393       +2     
  Branches    41897    41897              
==========================================
  Hits        52595    52595              
- Misses      94796    94798       +2     
Flag Coverage Δ
judicial-system-backend 55.66% <ø> (ø)
web 2.44% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
apps/web/pages/s/[...slugs]/index.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1eef914...25c6e51. Read the comment docs.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

Datadog Report

Branch report: feature/web-organization-page-parent-subpage-level2-visible-despite-theme
Commit report: 731d643
Test service: web

✅ 0 Failed, 84 Passed, 0 Skipped, 24.8s Total Time
➡️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 1 no change

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants