chore(j-s): Robot Court Name

[gudjong]

Robot Court Name

Fjarlægja héraðsdóm úr body í robot tölvupóstum

What

• Removers court names from robot email bodies.

Why

• Simplification, the court names are already in the robot email subjects.

Checklist:

• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• Formatting passes locally with my changes
• I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Simplified data structure for case updates by removing the courtName field from various methods.

• Bug Fixes

  • Ensured consistency in the content structure sent to the robot across multiple methods.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the CourtService class in court.service.ts by updating several methods to exclude the courtName parameter from the content sent to the robot. This change affects the method signatures for updateIndictmentCaseWithAssignedRoles, updateIndictmentCaseWithCancellationNotice, updateIndictmentCaseWithIndictmentInfo, and updateCaseWithConclusion, streamlining the data structure by removing the courtName field across these methods.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/court/court.service.ts	Updated method signatures for updateIndictmentCaseWithAssignedRoles, updateIndictmentCaseWithCancellationNotice, updateIndictmentCaseWithIndictmentInfo, and updateCaseWithConclusion to remove the courtName parameter.

Possibly related PRs

• chore(j-s): Robot Case File Email #15123: This PR modifies the content structure in the CourtService class, which is relevant as the main PR also involves changes to the content structure sent to the robot in the same class.
• feat(j-s): Deliver defender info to robot for indictment cases #15191: This PR introduces a feature for sending messages related to indictment cases to the court robot, which aligns with the main PR's focus on updating methods that send information to the robot.
• feat(j-s): Deliver assigned court roles for indictments to court  #15205: This PR adds functionality for delivering assigned court roles for indictments, which is related to the changes in the main PR that also involve updating methods in the CourtService class.
• fix(j-s): Indictment assigned roles in robot message #15434: This PR modifies the logic for assigning roles in the InternalCaseService, which is relevant as the main PR also deals with the CourtService methods that handle roles and case information.
• chore(j-s): Robot emails #16316: This PR enhances the information sent in robot emails by including the court name, which is relevant to the main PR's changes that involve the structure of data sent to the robot.
• fix(j-s): Indictment Name #16729: This PR addresses the indictment name sent to court, which is relevant as the main PR modifies methods that also deal with indictment-related information being sent to the robot.

Suggested labels

automerge

Suggested reviewers

• oddsson

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4137b1f and 70e599e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/court/court.service.ts (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (1)

apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/court/court.service.ts (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

• NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
• Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
• Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."

🔇 Additional comments (1)

apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/court/court.service.ts (1)

658-658: LGTM! Content generation aligns with PR objective.

The change correctly removes court name from the email body while maintaining it in the subject line, which aligns with the PR objective to simplify email content.

Let's verify consistency across similar methods:

✅ Verification successful

Let me verify if any of these content objects contain courtName. I'll search for it in the context around these JSON.stringify calls.

---

Verified: Content generation is consistent with PR objective

The verification confirms that none of the JSON content objects include courtName in their payload, while it's consistently used only in email subject lines. This aligns with the PR's goal of removing court names from robot-generated email bodies.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if other methods follow the same pattern of excluding courtName from content

# Search for JSON.stringify calls in content generation
rg -A 2 'const content = JSON\.stringify\(' 

Length of output: 2724

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for courtName in the context of content generation
rg -B 5 -A 5 'const content = JSON\.stringify\(' 

Length of output: 9756

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 35.68%. Comparing base (6ca2d70) to head (4d51e0a).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...tem/backend/src/app/modules/court/court.service.ts	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #17103   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   35.68%   35.68%           
=======================================
  Files        6946     6946           
  Lines      147391   147391           
  Branches    41897    41897           
=======================================
  Hits        52595    52595           
  Misses      94796    94796           

Flag	Coverage Δ
judicial-system-backend	55.66% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...tem/backend/src/app/modules/court/court.service.ts	39.55% <0.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d8e5cd2...4d51e0a. Read the comment docs.

[datadog-island-is]

Datadog Report

Branch report: j-s/remove-court-name-from-robot-body
Commit report: b7c5475
Test service: judicial-system-backend

✅ 0 Failed, 21181 Passed, 0 Skipped, 17m 25.42s Total Time
➡️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 1 no change