fix(application-system): Fix radio and description field spacing #17256
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to form field components, focusing on padding and layout management. Changes are made to Changes
Suggested Labels
Suggested Reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/DescriptionFormField/DescriptionFormField.tsx (2)
19-21: Consider improving type safety and maintainability.While the nullish coalescing operators provide good fallbacks, consider these improvements:
- Define explicit types for the spacing properties in the
DescriptionFieldtype.- Extract magic numbers into named constants for better maintainability.
+const DEFAULT_PADDING_TOP = 2; +const DEFAULT_MARGIN = 0; + - const paddingTop = field.space ?? 2 - const marginBottom = field.marginBottom ?? 0 - const marginTop = field.marginTop ?? 0 + const paddingTop = field.space ?? DEFAULT_PADDING_TOP + const marginBottom = field.marginBottom ?? DEFAULT_MARGIN + const marginTop = field.marginTop ?? DEFAULT_MARGIN
Line range hint
1-73: Consider enhancing component configurability.The component follows good practices for reusability and type safety. To further improve its architecture, consider:
- Creating a theme-based spacing system that defines standard spacing values.
- Using a spacing scale that aligns with the design system.
- Documenting the expected values for spacing properties in the component's props interface.
libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/RadioFormField/RadioFormField.tsx (2)
51-52: Consider using a named constant for the default spacing value.The default value of
2would be more maintainable if defined as a named constant at the top of the file.+const DEFAULT_PADDING_TOP = 2 - const paddingTop = field.space ?? 2 + const paddingTop = field.space ?? DEFAULT_PADDING_TOP
111-112: Consider making padding values configurable through props.For better reusability across different contexts, consider making these padding values configurable through props with sensible defaults.
interface Props extends FieldBaseProps { field: RadioField + controllerPaddingTop?: number + controllerPaddingBottom?: number } // In the component: - paddingBottom={0} - paddingTop={2} + paddingBottom={props.controllerPaddingBottom ?? 0} + paddingTop={props.controllerPaddingTop ?? 2}libs/shared/form-fields/src/lib/RadioController/RadioController.tsx (2)
43-44: Consider adding JSDoc comments for the new propsThe padding props are well-typed and maintain backward compatibility. However, adding JSDoc comments would help library consumers understand the expected values and usage.
+ /** Padding bottom value for the radio button container */ paddingBottom?: BoxProps['paddingBottom'] + /** Padding top value for the radio button container */ paddingTop?: BoxProps['paddingTop']
106-110: Consider error message spacing optimizationThe error message GridColumn implementation is clean and consistent. However, you might want to consider using a smaller paddingBottom for error messages to reduce excessive spacing when errors are shown.
- paddingBottom={paddingBottom} + paddingBottom={1}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/CompanySearchFormField/CompanySearchFormField.tsx(1 hunks)libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/DescriptionFormField/DescriptionFormField.tsx(1 hunks)libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/RadioFormField/RadioFormField.tsx(3 hunks)libs/shared/form-fields/src/lib/RadioController/RadioController.tsx(5 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/CompanySearchFormField/CompanySearchFormField.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/RadioFormField/RadioFormField.tsx (1)
Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/shared/form-fields/src/lib/RadioController/RadioController.tsx (2)
Pattern libs/shared/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Cross-application utility functions, types, and constants.
- TypeScript best practices to ensure type safety and reusability.
- Documentation and examples for library consumers."
Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/DescriptionFormField/DescriptionFormField.tsx (1)
Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (6)
libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/DescriptionFormField/DescriptionFormField.tsx (1)
25-27: LGTM! Clean and consistent prop usage.
The spacing props are properly applied to the Box component, providing flexible layout control while maintaining consistency with the UI system.
libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/RadioFormField/RadioFormField.tsx (2)
54-54: LGTM! Good accessibility practices.
The Box component correctly uses the dynamic padding while maintaining proper ARIA attributes.
77-77: Verify the impact of removed margin properties.
The removal of margin properties from the Box wrapper might affect the spacing between elements. Please ensure this change doesn't negatively impact the layout in different contexts.
✅ Verification successful
Margin changes are intentionally replaced with padding in RadioController
The removal of marginTop={2} from the Box wrapper is actually compensated by the addition of paddingTop={2} in the RadioController component. This is a deliberate refactoring to move spacing control to the RadioController component itself, which now supports paddingBottom and paddingTop properties. The layout spacing is maintained, just managed differently.
- The spacing value (2) remains the same, just moved from Box's margin to RadioController's padding
- The change is part of a larger commit that adds padding variable support to RadioController
- The layout impact is neutral as the spacing is preserved
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for other instances of this component to verify consistent spacing patterns
rg -t tsx -t jsx "RadioFormField" --glob '!**/RadioFormField.tsx'
Length of output: 93
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for RadioFormField usage in all files
rg "RadioFormField"
# Search for the previous version of RadioFormField to see margin properties
git show HEAD~1 -- "libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/RadioFormField/RadioFormField.tsx"
Length of output: 5906
libs/shared/form-fields/src/lib/RadioController/RadioController.tsx (3)
11-11: LGTM: Clean import addition
The BoxProps import is properly added from the shared UI library for typing the new padding properties.
74-75: LGTM: Clean implementation of padding props
The padding props are properly passed to GridColumn, providing flexible spacing control while maintaining consistency.
60-61: Verify default padding values across form fields
The default values look reasonable, but let's verify they align with other form field components in the library.
✅ Verification successful
Default padding values are consistent with form field components
The padding values in RadioController (paddingBottom=2, paddingTop=0) are appropriate because:
- CheckboxController, a similar form field component, also uses a default spacing of 2 for bottom padding
- The asymmetric padding (bottom=2, top=0) helps create consistent vertical rhythm between form elements
- These values are used with BoxProps, indicating they follow the design system's spacing scale
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for padding default values in other form field components
ast-grep --pattern 'paddingBottom = $_' libs/shared/form-fields/
ast-grep --pattern 'paddingTop = $_' libs/shared/form-fields/
Length of output: 130
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for padding props in form field components using ripgrep for broader context
rg -U "padding(Bottom|Top)\s*=\s*\d+" libs/shared/form-fields/ -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 637
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any padding-related props in form field components using a more flexible pattern
rg -U "padding.*?props|padding.*?=|padding.*?:|\bpadding\b" libs/shared/form-fields/ -A 2 -B 2
# Also search for spacing-related constants or theme values that might define default paddings
rg -U "spacing|theme.*padding" libs/shared/form-fields/ -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 5026
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 22 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 21 Passed Test ServicesThis report shows up to 10 services
🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (1)
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #17256 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 35.71% 35.71%
=======================================
Files 6944 6944
Lines 148533 148532 -1
Branches 42401 42402 +1
=======================================
+ Hits 53044 53046 +2
+ Misses 95489 95486 -3 Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/DescriptionFormField/DescriptionFormField.tsx (1)
19-21: Consider extracting default spacing values to constantsWhile the default values are reasonable, consider extracting them to named constants or a theme configuration. This would make it easier to maintain consistent spacing across components.
+const DEFAULT_SPACE = 2 +const DEFAULT_MARGIN = 0 + - const paddingTop = field.space ?? 2 - const marginBottom = field.marginBottom ?? 0 - const marginTop = field.marginTop ?? 0 + const paddingTop = field.space ?? DEFAULT_SPACE + const marginBottom = field.marginBottom ?? DEFAULT_MARGIN + const marginTop = field.marginTop ?? DEFAULT_MARGINlibs/shared/form-fields/src/lib/RadioController/RadioController.tsx (2)
106-110: Consider extracting common GridColumn props.The padding props are duplicated between the main content and error GridColumns. Consider extracting these common props to reduce duplication.
+ const columnProps = { paddingBottom, paddingTop, span: ['1/1', split] }; - <GridColumn - span={['1/1', split]} - paddingBottom={paddingBottom} - paddingTop={paddingTop} - > + <GridColumn {...columnProps}>
43-44: Architecture looks solid and follows guidelines.The changes:
- Maintain component reusability through flexible props
- Use proper TypeScript types
- Keep the component tree-shakeable
- Provide consistent cross-application styling utility
Also applies to: 60-61, 74-75, 106-110
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/CompanySearchFormField/CompanySearchFormField.tsx(1 hunks)libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/DescriptionFormField/DescriptionFormField.tsx(1 hunks)libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/RadioFormField/RadioFormField.tsx(3 hunks)libs/shared/form-fields/src/lib/RadioController/RadioController.tsx(5 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/CompanySearchFormField/CompanySearchFormField.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/DescriptionFormField/DescriptionFormField.tsx (1)
Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/RadioFormField/RadioFormField.tsx (1)
Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/shared/form-fields/src/lib/RadioController/RadioController.tsx (2)
Pattern libs/shared/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Cross-application utility functions, types, and constants.
- TypeScript best practices to ensure type safety and reusability.
- Documentation and examples for library consumers."
Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (7)
libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/DescriptionFormField/DescriptionFormField.tsx (1)
Line range hint 1-18: Well-structured component with proper TypeScript usage!
The component demonstrates good practices:
- Strong typing with proper TypeScript interfaces
- Named exports for better tree-shaking
- Clear prop definitions for reusability across NextJS apps
libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/RadioFormField/RadioFormField.tsx (3)
51-52: LGTM! Good use of nullish coalescing for default spacing.
The padding extraction with fallback value maintains consistency with the UI system's spacing scale.
54-54: LGTM! Good accessibility implementation.
The Box component correctly implements ARIA attributes while maintaining flexible spacing through the dynamic paddingTop prop.
111-112: Verify the visual impact of the new padding values.
The explicit padding values look correct, but we should verify that setting paddingBottom={0} doesn't create undesirable spacing in different contexts.
✅ Verification successful
The padding values are valid and safe to use
The RadioController component explicitly supports both paddingBottom and paddingTop props as part of its interface, which are typed to accept BoxProps padding values. Setting paddingBottom={0} and paddingTop={2} is perfectly valid according to the component's API.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other instances where RadioController is used with different padding values
ast-grep --pattern 'RadioController $$$paddingBottom={$_}$$$'
Length of output: 63
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if RadioController exists and its usage patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'RadioController'
# Also search for the component name with ripgrep for any string matches
rg "RadioController" -A 3
Length of output: 51523
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the RadioController component implementation to understand its padding props
ast-grep --pattern 'interface Props {
$$$
}' libs/shared/form-fields/src/lib/RadioController/RadioController.tsx
# Also check the actual component implementation for padding
ast-grep --pattern 'export const RadioController: FC<React.PropsWithChildren<Props>> = ({
$$$
})' libs/shared/form-fields/src/lib/RadioController/RadioController.tsx
Length of output: 1867
libs/shared/form-fields/src/lib/RadioController/RadioController.tsx (3)
11-11: LGTM! Well-typed props using BoxProps.
Good practice using BoxProps type for padding properties, ensuring type safety and consistency with the UI system.
Also applies to: 43-44
60-61: LGTM! Sensible default values.
The default padding values maintain backward compatibility while allowing for customization.
74-75: LGTM! Consistent prop passing.
The padding props are correctly passed to GridColumn, maintaining the component's flexibility.
norda-gunni
force-pushed
the
sa-spacing-fix
branch
from
aedcbd1 to
b66beb7
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
libs/shared/form-fields/src/lib/RadioController/RadioController.tsx (2)
11-11: Add JSDoc documentation for the new padding propsWhile the type definitions are correct, please add JSDoc documentation for the new padding properties to help consumers understand their purpose and usage.
Add documentation like this:
interface Props { // ... existing props ... + /** Spacing below each radio button. Defaults to 2. */ paddingBottom?: BoxProps['paddingBottom'] + /** Spacing above each radio button. Defaults to 0. */ paddingTop?: BoxProps['paddingTop'] }Also applies to: 43-44
60-61: LGTM! Consider centralizing default valuesThe padding implementation is consistent and well-structured. The same padding values are correctly applied to both radio buttons and error messages, ensuring visual consistency.
Consider defining the default values as constants at the top of the file for better maintainability:
+ const DEFAULT_PADDING_BOTTOM = 2; + const DEFAULT_PADDING_TOP = 0; export const RadioController: FC<React.PropsWithChildren<Props>> = ({ // ... - paddingBottom = 2, - paddingTop = 0, + paddingBottom = DEFAULT_PADDING_BOTTOM, + paddingTop = DEFAULT_PADDING_TOP, // ... }) => {Also applies to: 74-75, 106-110
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/DescriptionFormField/DescriptionFormField.tsx(1 hunks)libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/RadioFormField/RadioFormField.tsx(3 hunks)libs/shared/form-fields/src/lib/RadioController/RadioController.tsx(5 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/DescriptionFormField/DescriptionFormField.tsx
- libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/RadioFormField/RadioFormField.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/shared/form-fields/src/lib/RadioController/RadioController.tsx (2)
Pattern libs/shared/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Cross-application utility functions, types, and constants.
- TypeScript best practices to ensure type safety and reusability.
- Documentation and examples for library consumers."
Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (1)
libs/shared/form-fields/src/lib/RadioController/RadioController.tsx (1)
43-44: Verify the impact on existing implementations
Let's ensure these padding changes align with existing usage patterns and the PR's objective of fixing spacing issues.
✅ Verification successful
The padding props are safe to add and align with existing usage patterns
The code analysis shows that:
- The
RadioControlleris used across multiple form implementations but none explicitly use padding props yet - The padding props have safe default values (
paddingBottom = 2andpaddingTop = 0) - The changes maintain backward compatibility since the props are optional
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for RadioController usage to verify padding prop patterns
echo "Checking RadioController usage patterns..."
rg -A 3 "RadioController" --type tsx
# Look for related spacing fixes in description fields
echo "Checking related description field implementations..."
rg -l "DescriptionFormField" --type tsx
Length of output: 344
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for RadioController usage patterns
echo "Checking RadioController usage patterns..."
rg -A 3 "RadioController"
# Look for related description field implementations
echo "Checking related description field implementations..."
rg -l "DescriptionFormField"
# Check the specific file content
echo "Checking the specific file content..."
cat libs/shared/form-fields/src/lib/RadioController/RadioController.tsx
Length of output: 46834
norda-gunni
added
the
deprecated:automerge
...
Attach a link to issue if relevant
What
Specify what you're trying to achieve
Why
Specify why you need to achieve this
Screenshots / Gifs
Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
DescriptionFormFieldandRadioFormFieldcomponents for improved layout control.RadioControllercomponent, allowing for dynamic adjustments.Bug Fixes