fix(application-system): Fix post-cleanup codegen #17293
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a modification to the type casting of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #17293 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 35.68% 35.69%
=======================================
Files 6922 6921 -1
Lines 148524 148515 -9
Branches 42419 42417 -2
=======================================
Hits 53008 53008
+ Misses 95516 95507 -9
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 6 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 6 Passed Test Services
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/miscUtils.ts (1)
Line range hint
41-48: Improve type safety and error handlingThe current implementation could benefit from more explicit type safety and error handling:
- The function's return type should be explicitly defined
- Add proper null checks instead of relying on double bang (!!)
- Consider splitting the business logic into more explicit named functions
- export const hasReceivedConfirmation = (answers: FormValue) => { + export const hasReceivedConfirmation = (answers: FormValue): boolean => { + const confirmations = getValueViaPath( + answers, + 'accidentStatus.receivedConfirmations', + ) as AccidentConfirmationStatus + + if (!confirmations) { + return false + } + if (isReportingOnBehalfOfEmployee(answers)) { - return !!accidentConfirmations.InjuredOrRepresentativeParty + return Boolean(confirmations.InjuredOrRepresentativeParty) } - return !!accidentConfirmations.CompanyParty + return Boolean(confirmations.CompanyParty) }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/miscUtils.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/miscUtils.ts (1)
Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
norda-gunni
added
automerge
...
Attach a link to issue if relevant
What
Specify what you're trying to achieve
Why
Specify why you need to achieve this
Screenshots / Gifs
Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Documentation