-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(j-s): select all when only invalid files are in list #17552
Conversation
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request focuses on refactoring the Changes
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Possibly related PRs
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Datadog ReportBranch report: ✅ 0 Failed, 333 Passed, 0 Skipped, 58.52s Total Time |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/SelectableList/SelectableList.tsx (2)
106-106
: Consider memoizing the filtered list for better performance.Since
validSelectableItems
is computed on every render and used in multiple places, consider usinguseMemo
to optimize performance.- const validSelectableItems = selectableItems.filter((item) => !item.invalid) + const validSelectableItems = useMemo( + () => selectableItems.filter((item) => !item.invalid), + [selectableItems] + )
Line range hint
106-135
: Consider adding error boundaries and edge case handling.While the changes look good, consider these improvements for better error handling:
- Add null checks when accessing
selectableItems
- Implement an error boundary to gracefully handle rendering failures
- Add PropTypes or runtime type checking for better debugging
This will make the component more robust and maintainable.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/SelectableList/SelectableList.tsx
(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/SelectableList/SelectableList.tsx (1)
Pattern apps/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/SelectableList/SelectableList.tsx (1)
135-135
: LGTM! Correctly implements the disabled state.The disabled state now properly handles the case when only invalid files are present, which directly addresses the PR objective.
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/SelectableList/SelectableList.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #17552 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 35.58% 35.59%
=======================================
Files 7025 7025
Lines 150558 150527 -31
Branches 43004 42979 -25
=======================================
- Hits 53582 53574 -8
+ Misses 96976 96953 -23
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 11 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice en kanínan er með gott comment
Asana task
What
Why
Screenshots / Gifs
Full functionality tested locally on dev data
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a929309d-26f6-4215-8cb9-b7382d906fe7
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit