Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(secondary school): Update message IDs #17628

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 24, 2025

Conversation

johannaagma
Copy link
Member

@johannaagma johannaagma commented Jan 23, 2025

...

Attach a link to issue if relevant

What

Specify what you're trying to achieve

Why

Specify why you need to achieve this

Screenshots / Gifs

Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Corrected message identifiers in secondary school application templates
      • Fixed actionCardInReview message ID to accurately reflect application review status
      • Updated alert message identifiers for freshman and general categories
      • Aligned error message ID with its intended description
      • Updated history and pending action message identifiers for better organization and clarity

@johannaagma johannaagma requested a review from a team as a code owner January 23, 2025 09:51
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request focuses on refining message identifiers across multiple files in the secondary school application templates. The changes involve updating specific message IDs to more accurately reflect their intended purpose and state. Modifications are made in three files: application.ts, conclusion.ts, and error.ts, where message identifiers are corrected to provide more precise and descriptive labels for different application states and error messages.

Changes

File Change Summary
libs/application/templates/secondary-school/src/lib/messages/application.ts Updated message IDs for various properties to include the application namespace:
- actionCardInReview: from 'ss.application:actionCardCompleted' to 'ss.application:actionCardInReview'
- edited: from 'ss.historyMessages:edited' to 'ss.application:historyMessages.edited'
- reviewFinished: from 'ss.historyMessages:reviewFinished' to 'ss.application:historyMessages.reviewFinished'
- inReviewTitle: from 'ss.pendingActionMessages:inReviewTitle' to 'ss.application:pendingActionMessages.inReviewTitle'
- inReviewDescription: from 'ss.pendingActionMessages:inReviewDescription' to 'ss.application:pendingActionMessages.inReviewDescription'
- reviewFinishedTitle: from 'ss.pendingActionMessages:reviewFinishedTitle' to 'ss.application:pendingActionMessages.reviewFinishedTitle'
- reviewFinishedDescription: from 'ss.pendingActionMessages:reviewFinishedDescription' to 'ss.application:pendingActionMessages.reviewFinishedDescription'
libs/application/templates/secondary-school/src/lib/messages/conclusion.ts Updated message IDs for alertMessageFreshman and alertMessageGeneral to be more specific:
- alertMessageFreshman: from ss.application:conclusion.overview.alertMessage to ss.application:conclusion.overview.alertMessageFreshman
- alertMessageGeneral: from ss.application:conclusion.overview.alertMessage to ss.application:conclusion.overview.alertMessageGeneral
libs/application/templates/secondary-school/src/lib/messages/error.ts Updated errorValidateCanCreateDescription message ID from 'ss.application:error.errorValidateCanCreateTitle' to 'ss.application:error.errorValidateCanCreateDescription'

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

automerge

Suggested reviewers

  • johannaagma

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cde1c26 and 4dd3975.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • libs/application/templates/secondary-school/src/lib/messages/conclusion.ts (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • libs/application/templates/secondary-school/src/lib/messages/conclusion.ts

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
libs/application/templates/secondary-school/src/lib/messages/application.ts (1)

33-36: Fix the description comment to match the "in review" state.

The description comment incorrectly states "when application is completed" but this message is for the "in review" state.

    id: 'ss.application:actionCardInReview',
    defaultMessage: 'Í vinnslu hjá stofnun',
    description:
-      'Description of application state/status when application is completed',
+      'Description of application state/status when application is in review',
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8ac548f and 4281ff3.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • libs/application/templates/secondary-school/src/lib/messages/application.ts (1 hunks)
  • libs/application/templates/secondary-school/src/lib/messages/conclusion.ts (1 hunks)
  • libs/application/templates/secondary-school/src/lib/messages/error.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
libs/application/templates/secondary-school/src/lib/messages/error.ts (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/secondary-school/src/lib/messages/application.ts (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/secondary-school/src/lib/messages/conclusion.ts (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (3)
libs/application/templates/secondary-school/src/lib/messages/error.ts (1)

15-15: LGTM! Message ID correctly updated to match its purpose.

The ID change from 'errorValidateCanCreateTitle' to 'errorValidateCanCreateDescription' properly aligns with the message's purpose as a description rather than a title.

libs/application/templates/secondary-school/src/lib/messages/application.ts (1)

33-33: LGTM! Message ID correctly updated to match the application state.

The ID change from 'actionCardCompleted' to 'actionCardInReview' properly reflects the "in review" state of the application.

libs/application/templates/secondary-school/src/lib/messages/conclusion.ts (1)

68-68: LGTM! Message IDs correctly differentiated for freshman and general cases.

The ID changes properly distinguish between freshman and general alert messages, making the code more maintainable and the message purposes clearer.

Also applies to: 74-74

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 35.51%. Comparing base (e806b37) to head (5053158).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #17628      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   35.56%   35.51%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files        7033     7033              
  Lines      150539   150736     +197     
  Branches    42976    43051      +75     
==========================================
- Hits        53545    53537       -8     
- Misses      96994    97199     +205     
Flag Coverage Δ
api 3.33% <ø> (ø)
application-system-api 38.67% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
application-template-api-modules 27.55% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
application-ui-shell 21.99% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...s/secondary-school/src/lib/messages/application.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...es/secondary-school/src/lib/messages/conclusion.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...mplates/secondary-school/src/lib/messages/error.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)

... and 8 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e806b37...5053158. Read the comment docs.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

Datadog Report

All test runs 1fce548 🔗

8 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 7 Passed
🔻 Test Sessions change in coverage: 1 decreased (-0.02%), 11 no change

Test Services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
api 0 0 0 4 0 10.01s 1 no change Link
application-system-api 0 0 0 46 0 2m 18.24s 1 no change Link
application-template-api-modules 0 0 0 85 0 0s N/A Link
application-templates-financial-aid 0 0 0 11 0 31.5s 1 no change Link
judicial-system-backend 0 0 0 21171 0 11m 47.22s 1 no change Link
services-auth-delegation-api 0 0 0 270 0 4m 1.03s 1 decreased (-0.02%) Link
services-auth-personal-representative 0 0 0 0 0 505.88ms 1 no change Link
web 0 0 0 84 0 54.81s 1 no change Link

🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (1)

  • services-auth-delegation-api - jest 50.43% (-0.02%) - Details

@johannaagma johannaagma enabled auto-merge January 24, 2025 09:23
@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Jan 24, 2025

Datadog Report

All test runs 74f7ee5 🔗

4 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 4 Passed
🔻 Test Sessions change in coverage: 1 decreased (-0.01%), 7 no change

Test Services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
api 0 0 0 4 0 2.4s 1 no change Link
application-system-api 0 0 0 46 0 1m 53.11s 1 no change Link
application-template-api-modules 0 0 0 118 0 2m 4.85s 1 decreased (-0.01%) Link
application-ui-shell 0 0 0 74 0 31.43s 1 no change Link

🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (1)

  • application-template-api-modules - jest 30.02% (-0.01%) - Details

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants