Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(j-s): Base64 Import #17951

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 13, 2025
Merged

fix(j-s): Base64 Import #17951

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 13, 2025

Conversation

gudjong
Copy link
Member

@gudjong gudjong commented Feb 13, 2025

Base64 Import

Bæta við nýjum file category-um til að senda á LÖKE (gögn sem eru send inn)

What

  • Fixes Base64 import.

Why

  • Verified bug.

Screenshots / Gifs

Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the internal management of our encoding dependency to follow best practices. This refinement streamlines the codebase without affecting any user functionalities or visible performance.

@gudjong gudjong requested a review from a team as a code owner February 13, 2025 11:40
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 13, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the import method for the Base64 module within the FileService. The import statement is changed from a default import to a named import from the js-base64 package. No modifications have been made to the business logic, error handling, or control flow of the service.

Changes

File Change Summary
apps/judicial-system/backend/.../file.service.ts Updated Base64 import from default import to named import from js-base64.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

automerge

Suggested reviewers

  • oddsson

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 56985a0 and 6066764.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/file.service.ts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/file.service.ts

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Member

@unakb unakb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤝

@unakb unakb enabled auto-merge February 13, 2025 11:42
Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Feb 13, 2025

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 6066764.

Command Status Duration Result
nx run-many --projects judicial-system-backend ... ✅ Succeeded 14m 40s View ↗
nx run-many --target=lint --projects=judicial-s... ✅ Succeeded 17s View ↗
nx run-many --target=build --projects=judicial-... ✅ Succeeded 40s View ↗
nx run-many --target=codegen/frontend-client --... ✅ Succeeded 13s View ↗
nx run-many --target=codegen/backend-schema --a... ✅ Succeeded 38s View ↗

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2025-02-13 12:11:58 UTC

@unakb unakb added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 13, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 2f593e2 Feb 13, 2025
30 checks passed
@unakb unakb deleted the j-s/fix-deliver-case-file-to-loke branch February 13, 2025 12:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants