Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bump versions #105

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

bump versions #105

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

CorneliusIV
Copy link

This should bump us up to Django 3.0

There is still an issue Django RQ Wrapper islco/django-rq-wrapper#7

I also killed our banner.txt

We might want to also look into updating the frontend dependencies.

@@ -3,21 +3,21 @@ url = "https://pypi.python.org/simple"
verify_ssl = true

[packages]
django = "<2.2"
django = "<=3.1"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

shouldn't this be something more like ~3.1 or <3.2? This prevents those micro fixes from getting pulled in.

|_____|_____/|______| |______|_| |_|\__, |_|_| |_|\___|\___|_| |_|_| |_|\__, |
__/ | __/ |
|___/ |___/
Made with <3 in DC by https://isl.co
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:(

@joesolly
Copy link
Contributor

We should really add some tests to make sure this works before merging 🤷

@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
web: PYTHONUNBUFFERED=True python manage.py runserver 0.0.0.0:$PORT
static: npm run dev
rqworker: PYTHONUNBUFFERED=True python manage.py rqworkers high default low --autoreload
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh no! you removed django-rqworker. I suppose it probably doesn't work with django 4.0 (I'm not sure it worked with 2 or 3 either)

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@joesolly I forgot I had this PR open. I really was just updating my repo. Don't want to merge this in repo.... at least not yet.
But yeah RQ worker stopped working in 3.0 I think. Maybe we could get a few people together to see if there is any interests in fixing and maintaining. I know we talked about once.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@CorneliusIV Maybe, unfortunately, I currently only work in celery or RMQ, so I don't have any work motivation to fix this. Hackathon? Pizza and Rosé?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants