Use portable header identifiers

[apenn-msft]

add a new rule governing how to compose portable header path identifiers such that they respect proper casing (<vector>, not <VECTOR>) and portable path separators ('/' and not '\')

[apenn-msft]

can someone help me fix the spelling warning? as far as I can tell it's complaining about the word "utils" appearing in code sample where "utils" already appears and possibly the only complaint is it appears in the comment of the code, which seems just way over done.

[cubbimew]

can someone help me fix the spelling warning? as far as I can tell it's complaining about the word "utils" appearing in code sample where "utils" already appears

yes, it wants you to add 'utils' next to util to ./scripts/hunspell/isocpp.dic

[apenn-msft]

can someone help me fix the spelling warning? as far as I can tell it's complaining about the word "utils" appearing in code sample where "utils" already appears

yes, it wants you to add 'utils' next to util to ./scripts/hunspell/isocpp.dic

thanks, I guess if that's an indication util is the more normalized thing for "utilities" I'll probably just rename the example to use util

[apenn-msft]

I did some searching on the webs, I think practically people name these things "utils" but standard has:
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/header/utility

so util it is

[hsutter]

Editors call: Looks good, thanks!