Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: a bunch of updates to recent docs #1038

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 1, 2019

Conversation

AndrewFinlay
Copy link
Contributor

@AndrewFinlay AndrewFinlay commented Mar 21, 2019

These are things that I didn't like in my original docs, the final straw being finding 'in in' in one of the lines. Hopefully this makes things better!

Note I also added a change to the list of default .nycrc files to include nyc.config.js

These are from things that I didn't like in my original docs, the final straw being finding 'in in' in one of the lines.
Hopefully this makes things better!
Note I also added a change to the list of default `.nycrc` files to include `nyc.config.js`
@AndrewFinlay AndrewFinlay changed the title [skip ci]A bunch of docs fix-ups docs: a bunch of updates to recent docs Mar 21, 2019
@@ -298,7 +299,7 @@ modules should be required in the subprocess collecting coverage:

## Configuring `nyc`

Any configuration options that can be set via the command line can also be specified in the `nyc` stanza of your package.json, or within a `.nycrc` (or `.nycrc.json`) file:
Any configuration options that can be set via the command line can also be specified in the `nyc` stanza of your package.json, or within a `.nycrc`, `.nycrc.json`, or `nyc.config.js` file:

**package.json:**
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

could remove this line since we are saying this can go in multiple places...

and come to think of it, it would be really nice if this was actually just a table with the option names, valid input types and values, and a definition... That's a lot of work though so I will happily merge this PR without that!

@JaKXz JaKXz requested a review from coreyfarrell March 28, 2019 19:54
@JaKXz
Copy link
Member

JaKXz commented Mar 28, 2019

This is awesome @AndrewFinlay [my comment is a nitpick that can be handled in a future PR] - I'll just let another set of eyes take a look before I merge. :)

@coreyfarrell coreyfarrell merged commit 3eb0e37 into istanbuljs:master Apr 1, 2019
@AndrewFinlay AndrewFinlay deleted the docs-fixup branch April 2, 2019 00:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants