Add MseeP.ai badge #19
Conversation
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @lwsinclair, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request integrates a security assessment badge from MseeP.ai into the project's README.md file. The primary purpose is to visually communicate the project's security status, as assessed by a third-party service, and provide a direct link to a comprehensive security report.
Highlights
- README Update: Added a new MseeP.ai security assessment badge to the top of the
README.mdfile. This badge provides a visual indicator of the project's security posture and links to a detailed security assessment page on MseeP.ai.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
在README中添加MseeP.ai安全评估徽章变更概述文档 - 更新项目文档以集成第三方安全验证信息
变更文件
💡 小贴士与 lingma-agents 交流的方式📜 直接回复评论
📜 在代码行处标记
📜 在讨论中提问
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request adds a security assessment badge from MseeP.ai to the README.md file.
My review focuses on ensuring the README remains well-structured and consistent. I have a couple of suggestions:
- Badge Placement: I've suggested reordering the
README.mdto place the new badge after the main project title, which is a standard convention for better readability. - Localization: The corresponding Chinese
README_zh.mdfile was not updated. To maintain consistency across localized documentation, the new badge should be added there as well.
Additionally, while reviewing the context in the pull request description, I noticed a small inconsistency in the provided security report. It states a score of 100/100, but also lists a vulnerability. The vulnerability is categorized under a "Medium Severity" heading, but its details list it as "low" severity. It would be helpful for the project maintainers if this could be clarified.
Thank you for the contribution.
| [](https://mseep.ai/app/istarwyh-mcpadvisor) | ||
|
|
||
| # MCP Advisor | ||
|
|
||
| [](https://modelcontextprotocol.org) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for adding the security badge. For better project presentation and to follow common repository standards, it's best to place badges after the main project title. The title should be the very first thing in the README.
| [](https://mseep.ai/app/istarwyh-mcpadvisor) | |
| # MCP Advisor | |
| [](https://modelcontextprotocol.org) | |
| # MCP Advisor | |
| [](https://mseep.ai/app/istarwyh-mcpadvisor) | |
| [](https://modelcontextprotocol.org) |
1 participant
Hi there,
This pull request shares a security update on mcpadvisor.
We also have an entry for mcpadvisor in our directory, MseeP.ai, where we provide regular security and trust updates on your app.
We invite you to add our badge for your MCP server to your README to help your users learn from a third party that provides ongoing validation of mcpadvisor.
You can easily take control over your listing for free: visit it at https://mseep.ai/app/istarwyh-mcpadvisor.
Yours Sincerely,
Lawrence W. Sinclair
CEO/SkyDeck AI
Founder of MseeP.ai
MCP servers you can trust
Here are our latest evaluation results of mcpadvisor
Security Scan Results
Security Score: 100/100
Risk Level: low
Scan Date: 2025-06-13
Score starts at 100, deducts points for security issues, and adds points for security best practices
Detected Vulnerabilities
Medium Severity
This security assessment was conducted by MseeP.ai, an independent security validation service for MCP servers. Visit our website to learn more about our security reviews.