-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 343
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add PR/MR comments #776
add PR/MR comments #776
Conversation
DavidGOrtega
commented
Oct 24, 2021
•
edited
Loading
edited
- closes support PR comments #735
- Avoid request of comments even if no update is needed
- Dryer building the business logic in CML and not one for every single driver
- Standardises driver return (comment url)
@0x2b3bfa0 is ready for review, however seems that TB tests are failing, not because of this PR I might say. |
d270fad
to
95bee58
Compare
95bee58
to
0345dc5
Compare
TB tests are failing due to python 3.10. |
@DavidGOrtega, are you inadvertently using @iterative-olivaw's identity for your commits? 🤔 |
* fix: upgrade pseudoexec from 0.1.4 to 0.2.0 Snyk has created this PR to upgrade pseudoexec from 0.1.4 to 0.2.0. See this package in npm: https://www.npmjs.com/package/pseudoexec See this project in Snyk: https://app.snyk.io/org/casperdcl/project/58d0fcac-fe96-4a3b-b587-5fa62067cfa1 Note from @0x2b3bfa0: incidentally, this package is my brainchild and the only major difference between earlier versions and 0.2 is tests. https://github.com/0x2b3bfa0/node-pseudoexec Co-authored-by: Helio Machado <0x2b3bfa0+git@googlemail.com>
* Fixes TB python 3.10 failure * py3.9 Co-authored-by: Olivaw[bot] <olivaw@iterative.ai> Co-authored-by: Casper da Costa-Luis <casper.dcl@physics.org>
ec9a488
to
97a1442
Compare
I know why, inside a linux machine where Im developing a new |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🎉 minor comments
related to iterative/cml#776
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me!
Co-authored-by: Casper da Costa-Luis <casper.dcl@physics.org>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm 🙏
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
actually GL tests failing now :/
sometimes the onprem GL is not ready and tests must be repeated. We have been dealing with that |