output: check legacy hash name in output.add() #9646
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
efiop
approved these changes
Jun 22, 2023
pmrowla
force-pushed
the
add-legacy-hash
branch
2 times, most recently
from
5cf0ded to
e50398a
Compare
Codecov ReportPatch coverage:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #9646 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.33% 90.33% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 471 471
Lines 36228 36231 +3
Branches 5214 5214
==========================================
+ Hits 32727 32728 +1
- Misses 2889 2890 +1
- Partials 612 613 +1
β View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
β I have followed the Contributing to DVC checklist.
π If this PR requires documentation updates, I have created a separate PR (or issue, at least) in dvc.org and linked it here.
Thank you for the contribution - we'll try to review it as soon as possible. π
Fixes #9645