Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency jest-watch-typeahead to v2 - autoclosed #107

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jul 11, 2022

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
jest-watch-typeahead ^1.1.0 -> ^2.0.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

jest-community/jest-watch-typeahead (jest-watch-typeahead)

v2.2.2

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v2.2.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v2.2.0

Compare Source

Features

2.1.1 (2022-08-25)

Bug Fixes

v2.1.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v2.1.0

Compare Source

Features
  • add support for Jest 29 (bebd216)

v2.0.0

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • deps: update dependency ansi-escapes to v5 (#​87) (b990d44)
  • drop support for Node 12 and 17 (0f4b1b6)
BREAKING CHANGES
  • Drop Node 12 and Node 17

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am on Monday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 11, 2022

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.36%. Comparing base (fef1705) to head (dcdb702).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #107   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.36%   98.36%           
=======================================
  Files           2        2           
  Lines         122      122           
  Branches       33       33           
=======================================
  Hits          120      120           
  Misses          2        2           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/jest-watch-typeahead-2.x branch from 8ddda3e to 04c72fa Compare April 10, 2023 05:00
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/jest-watch-typeahead-2.x branch from 04c72fa to 3ca8a9b Compare September 11, 2023 04:04
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/jest-watch-typeahead-2.x branch from 3ca8a9b to 534afc6 Compare August 16, 2024 10:06
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency jest-watch-typeahead to v2 chore(deps): update dependency jest-watch-typeahead to v2 - autoclosed Aug 16, 2024
@renovate renovate bot closed this Aug 16, 2024
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/jest-watch-typeahead-2.x branch August 16, 2024 10:18
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency jest-watch-typeahead to v2 - autoclosed chore(deps): update dependency jest-watch-typeahead to v2 Aug 16, 2024
@renovate renovate bot reopened this Aug 16, 2024
@renovate renovate bot restored the renovate/jest-watch-typeahead-2.x branch August 16, 2024 10:28
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/jest-watch-typeahead-2.x branch from 534afc6 to dcdb702 Compare August 16, 2024 10:30
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency jest-watch-typeahead to v2 chore(deps): update dependency jest-watch-typeahead to v2 - autoclosed Aug 16, 2024
@renovate renovate bot closed this Aug 16, 2024
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/jest-watch-typeahead-2.x branch August 16, 2024 10:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants