yampa-test: complete unit tests for FRP.Yampa.Conditional
#225
Comments
ivanperez-keera
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 30, 2022
This commit completes the unit tests for the functions in FRP.Yampa.Conditional without a unit test. The implementation of the test for pause is based on a model function of pause that uses ArrowLoop and ArrowCase. It is actually quite tricky to get right, which suggests that 1) we may need a simpler way to visualize and apply signal functions, or 2) perhaps pause is just too complex.
ivanperez-keera
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 30, 2022
ivanperez-keera
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 30, 2022
This commit completes the unit tests for the functions in FRP.Yampa.Conditional without a unit test. The implementation of the test for pause is based on a model function of pause that uses ArrowLoop and ArrowCase. It is actually quite tricky to get right, which suggests that 1) we may need a simpler way to visualize and apply signal functions, or 2) perhaps pause is just too complex.
ivanperez-keera
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 30, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Issue #217 showed that the tests for
FRP.Yampa.Conditionaldo not cover the whole module.The remaining definitions should also be tested, with a preference for QuickCheck-based unit tests.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: