Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

2399 IA improvments #2407

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 31, 2024
Merged

2399 IA improvments #2407

merged 2 commits into from
May 31, 2024

Conversation

tomlovesgithub
Copy link
Contributor

@tomlovesgithub tomlovesgithub commented May 22, 2024

What's included?

Needs digital-platform #1095 to function

Remove hard limit date for assessments.
Allow IA details to be changed after requests have been sent.

Who should test?

✅ Product owner
✅ Developers
✅ UTG

How to test?

  • Ensure there is no place for assessment hard limits to be entered into exercise details.
  • Verify that an assessment can be submitted after the due date.
  • Amend assessor details after request and see that they are reflected under the IA task.

Risk - how likely is this to impact other areas?

🟠 Medium risk - this does change code that is shared with other areas

Additional context

Screen.Recording.2024-05-22.at.18.11.00.mov

https://admin-develop.judicialappointments.digital/exercise/GYysuH7M4V21MFVM8Dzg/dashboard


PREVIEW:DEVELOP
can be OFF, DEVELOP or STAGING

Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 28, 2024

Visit the preview URL for this PR (updated for commit 97d5138):

https://jac-admin-develop--pr2407-2399-issues-with-ias-vcepeamu.web.app

(expires Thu, 27 Jun 2024 12:05:43 GMT)

🔥 via Firebase Hosting GitHub Action 🌎

Sign: 4e92cf51659207b0ae3509dc5c40edde50edfec0

@tomlovesgithub tomlovesgithub merged commit 9e38267 into main May 31, 2024
9 checks passed
@tomlovesgithub tomlovesgithub deleted the 2399/issues-with-IAs branch May 31, 2024 08:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants