You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Some of the code was an urgent fix and it mapped 'lord' to 'lady' chief justice in the lookups (filters).
Ultimately though we should:
remove that mapping of 'lord' to 'lady' chief justice
update db records to change 'lord' to 'lady' chief justice in exercise.appropriateAuthority (array)
Note that @warrensearle wanted to quiz @nickaddy on whether there were any knock-on effects from making this original change with respect to legacy data and also judge titles being listed next to their names, ie an exercise from 2 years ago may have a 'Lord Chief Justice' with a male name which will now appears next to 'Lady Chief Justice'.
Just noticed that there is an existing issue on the platform as a result of this original hotfix. See screenshot below:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A request came in to change 'Lord Chief Justice' to 'Lady Chief Justice'.
The following PRs were created and are now live to achieve this:
#962
jac-uk/admin#2214
jac-uk/apply#1104
Some of the code was an urgent fix and it mapped 'lord' to 'lady' chief justice in the lookups (filters).
Ultimately though we should:
Note that @warrensearle wanted to quiz @nickaddy on whether there were any knock-on effects from making this original change with respect to legacy data and also judge titles being listed next to their names, ie an exercise from 2 years ago may have a 'Lord Chief Justice' with a male name which will now appears next to 'Lady Chief Justice'.
Just noticed that there is an existing issue on the platform as a result of this original hotfix. See screenshot below:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: