Skip to content

[refactor] Move memory implementation to internal package #6646

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 1, 2025

Conversation

mahadzaryab1
Copy link
Collaborator

Which problem is this PR solving?

Description of the changes

  • This PR moves the implementation for memory storage from plugin/storage/ to internal/storage/

How was this change tested?

  • CI

Checklist

Sorry, something went wrong.

Verified

This commit was signed with the committer’s verified signature. The key has expired.
thefourtheye Sakthipriyan Vairamani
Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <mahadzaryab1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <mahadzaryab1@gmail.com>
@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 added the changelog:breaking-change Change that is breaking public APIs or established behavior label Feb 1, 2025
@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 requested a review from a team as a code owner February 1, 2025 21:54
@dosubot dosubot bot added the area/storage label Feb 1, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 1, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.95%. Comparing base (3588dbe) to head (c1f2c44).
Report is 12 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6646      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.96%   95.95%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         365      365              
  Lines       20602    20602              
==========================================
- Hits        19770    19768       -2     
- Misses        634      636       +2     
  Partials      198      198              
Flag Coverage Δ
badger_v1 9.92% <ø> (ø)
badger_v2 1.84% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v1-manual 14.93% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v2-auto 1.83% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v2-manual 1.83% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-5.x-v1-manual 14.93% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-5.x-v2-auto 1.83% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-5.x-v2-manual 1.83% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-6.x-v1 19.30% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-7.x-v1 19.38% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-8.x-v1 19.55% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-8.x-v2 1.84% <ø> (-0.12%) ⬇️
grpc_v1 10.90% <ø> (ø)
grpc_v2 7.89% <ø> (ø)
kafka-3.x-v1 10.21% <ø> (ø)
kafka-3.x-v2 1.84% <ø> (ø)
memory_v2 1.84% <ø> (ø)
opensearch-1.x-v1 19.43% <ø> (ø)
opensearch-2.x-v1 19.43% <ø> (ø)
opensearch-2.x-v2 1.84% <ø> (ø)
tailsampling-processor 0.48% <ø> (ø)
unittests 94.83% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 changed the title [refactor] Move memory implementation to internal package [refactor] Move memory implementation to internal package Feb 1, 2025

Verified

This commit was signed with the committer’s verified signature.
cjihrig Colin Ihrig
@yurishkuro yurishkuro enabled auto-merge (squash) February 1, 2025 23:24
@yurishkuro yurishkuro merged commit d5432a1 into jaegertracing:main Feb 1, 2025
55 checks passed
@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 added changelog:bugfix-or-minor-feature and removed changelog:breaking-change Change that is breaking public APIs or established behavior labels Feb 2, 2025
@yurishkuro yurishkuro added changelog:skip Trivial change that does not require an entry in CHANGELOG and removed changelog:bugfix-or-minor-feature labels Feb 3, 2025
Manik2708 pushed a commit to Manik2708/jaeger that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2025

Unverified

The email in this signature doesn’t match the committer email.
…acing#6646)

## Which problem is this PR solving?
- Towards jaegertracing#6637

## Description of the changes
- This PR moves the implementation for memory storage from
`plugin/storage/` to `internal/storage/`

## How was this change tested?
- CI

## Checklist
- [x] I have read
https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md
- [x] I have signed all commits
- [x] I have added unit tests for the new functionality
- [x] I have run lint and test steps successfully
  - for `jaeger`: `make lint test`
  - for `jaeger-ui`: `npm run lint` and `npm run test`

---------

Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <mahadzaryab1@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yuri Shkuro <yurishkuro@users.noreply.github.com>
@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 deleted the move-memory branch April 2, 2025 17:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/storage changelog:skip Trivial change that does not require an entry in CHANGELOG
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants