Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Would Microsoft's elm-json-tree-view package count as them using Elm in production? #36

Closed
r-k-b opened this issue Mar 26, 2019 · 2 comments · Fixed by #49
Closed

Would Microsoft's elm-json-tree-view package count as them using Elm in production? #36

r-k-b opened this issue Mar 26, 2019 · 2 comments · Fixed by #49

Comments

@r-k-b
Copy link
Contributor

r-k-b commented Mar 26, 2019

Microsoft have published an Elm module: https://github.com/Microsoft/elm-json-tree-view, http://package.elm-lang.org/packages/Microsoft/elm-json-tree-view/latest.

Would that be enough to count Microsoft as "using it in production?"

If so, which section should it appear under?

@nelsonic
Copy link
Collaborator

nelsonic commented Dec 9, 2019

@klazuka creator of https://github.com/klazuka/intellij-elm and https://github.com/klazuka/elm-json-tree-view works for MSFT. They might be able to offer some insight into MSFT's use of Elm in Production. 💡

@klazuka
Copy link

klazuka commented Dec 10, 2019

I have been using Elm in production at Microsoft since 2016. It is the frontend for a customer support system.

nelsonic added a commit to nelsonic/elm-companies that referenced this issue Dec 10, 2019
@nelsonic nelsonic mentioned this issue Dec 10, 2019
7 tasks
nelsonic added a commit to nelsonic/elm-companies that referenced this issue Dec 10, 2019
nelsonic added a commit to nelsonic/elm-companies that referenced this issue Dec 10, 2019
jah2488 pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 10, 2019
* Add Microsoft to list under new section "Software" (unless someone has a better suggestion) fixes #36

* Add detail required by Pull Request Checklist to Microsoft entry #36

* Reduce heading size of "Planning" from H3 to H4 for consistency. All other sub-headings are H4.

* Re-format GitHub link to be in parentheses for consistency with other entries

* Add link to Elm Town Podcast episode 43 where "Elm at Microsoft" is discussed. #36

* fix typo "Elmtown" > "Elm Town Podcast"
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants