Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v1.6.37 - RollupCalcItemReplacer bugfix #635

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 29, 2024
Merged

v1.6.37 - RollupCalcItemReplacer bugfix #635

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 29, 2024

Conversation

jamessimone
Copy link
Owner

  • Fixes error reported interally with polymorphic where clause replacements being mutually exclusive with the current list of items

…ents being mutually exclusive with the current list of items
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.65%. Comparing base (9ed1f4f) to head (03c6fdd).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #635      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.63%   96.65%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          33       33              
  Lines        6841     6843       +2     
  Branches       61       61              
==========================================
+ Hits         6611     6614       +3     
+ Misses        225      224       -1     
  Partials        5        5              
Flag Coverage Δ
Apex 96.88% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
LWC 92.02% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jamessimone jamessimone merged commit 9e89a1e into main Oct 29, 2024
1 check passed
@jamessimone jamessimone deleted the v1.6.37 branch October 29, 2024 20:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants